Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahesh vs the State( Nct of Delhi) and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 829/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6368/2026 MAHESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Sandeep Yadav.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 At the very outset, Mr. Sunil Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the applicant before the Trial Court. The bail application, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submissions.PRATEEK JALAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026SS/JM/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:14:47...
Arindam Mohanta vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2703/2026 and CM APPL. 13081/2026, CM APPL.Date of Decision: 26.02.2026IN THE MATTER OF:ARINDAM MOHANTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Mr. P. Venkatraju, Ms. Megha Tiwari, Mr. Satyam Parashar, Mr. Santosh Kumar Yadav, Ms. Monika Saini, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath and Ms Laxmi, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The petition prays for the following reliefs:i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of certiorari, declaring that the alleged marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 3 purportedly registered on 07.08.2025, is null, void, and non-est in law, having been registered without solemnisation in accordance with Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. ii. Issue a writ, order...
Dr. Harmeet Singh vs Border Security Force
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2738/2026DR. HARMEET SINGH.....Petitioner Through: Dr. S S Hooda and Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC, Mr. Amit Rana, Ms. Sonali Modi and Mr. Mukul Dev, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(a) Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to pass a reasoned order deciding the Post Confirmation Petition U/s 117(2) of the BSF Act preferred by the Petitioner against Findings and Sentence of the Ld. GSFC and Revision GSFC conducted in respect of the Petitioner; and(b) Award the cost of Litigation in favour of thePetitioner;2. Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, learned counsel for the respondent statesthat the respondent shall decide the post confirmation petition filed ...
M/S D.R. International Through Its Proprietor Sh. Dinesh Singh Panwar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 444/2026M/S D.R. INTERNATIONAL THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH.DINESH SINGH PANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu and Ms. Oshin Maggu, Advocates.versusM/S JU CARGO LOGISTICS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 13206/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.CM(M) 444/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 18th February, 2026, passed by the trial court in CS (Comm.) No. 579/2021, whereby the suit filed by the petitioner was dismissed in default for non-prosecution and non- appearance.4. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition with liberty to approac...
Anoop Jadhav vs Girver Singh Bisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 43/2026, CM APPL. 13313/2026, CM APPL. 13314/2026, CMAPPL. 13315/2026 & CM APPL. 13316/2026ANOOP JADHAV .....Appellant Through: Mr. B.P. Sharma, Mr. Ashish Gill, Ms. Shivani Kathpalia, AdvocatesversusGIRVER SINGH BISHT .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 26.02.20261. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Section 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed for setting aside thejudgment and Order dated 22.07.2025 whereby the Application forcondonation of delay of 460 days in filing the Appeal was dismissed and the RCA DJ No. 25/2025 was consequently rejected.2. Briefly stated, the Appellant was inducted as a tenant in the SuitProperty, i.e. Flat No. I-162, F-7, Third Floor, Lalita Park, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi in 2021. The Plaintiff/Appellant claimed that thereafter, various receipts/GPA, etc., were created in his favour for the entire sale consid...
Kela Devi vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 341/2026 KELA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divyanshu Pandit, Adv.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh (Panel Counsel) Mr. Amit Gupta (SPC) along with Mr. Vidur Dwivedi (GP) and Mr. Atik Gill, Adv. for R2/ SHO- Kalyan Puri (Delhi Police)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13310/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 341/20263. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated11.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 18835/2025. The said orderreads as under:- 3. The present petition seeks implementation of the directions contained in the order dated 07.05.2025, passed in Eviction Petition No. 620/2022 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citiz...
Manindra Nath Barman & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2684/2026 MANINDRA NATH BARMAN & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC, Mr. Deepansh Sharma, GP and Mr. S Chakraborty, Under SecretaryCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to cover the services of the Petitioners under the ambit of Old Pension Scheme in terms of the OM dated 03.03.2023.(ii) Pass any such orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit inthe light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.2. In effect, the petitioner contends that they are covered by the OldPension Scheme in terms of Office Memorandums dated 03.03.2023 and 09.04.2024 issued by the Department of Personnel and Train...
Ashok Arora vs Rajender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 26th February, 2026 + CM(M) 447/2026 ASHOK ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusRAJENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 13299/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.CM(M) 447/2026 & CM APPL. 13298/2026 (for stay)4. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/ defendant underArticle 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 12th February, 2026, passed by the trial court in SCJ No. 96365/2016, whereby the application seeking recall of the order dated 12th November, 2025 has been dismissed.5. Heard. Record perused.6. The Trial Court vide Order dated 12th November, 2025, has closed theright of the petitioner to lead ...
Abdul Waseem & Anr. vs Abdul Azim
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 201/2026 & I.A. 5423/2026 ABDUL WASEEM & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Mr. Hargun Singh Kalra, Mr. Shubham Bhati & Mr. Vidur Marwah, Advs.versusABDUL AZIM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by two years as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sho...
Vikramjeet Singh @ Vicky vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 837/2026 VIKRAMJEET SINGH @ VICKY .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Sahil.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6396/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6397/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 837/20263. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 122/2024, registered at Police Station Budh Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 307/506/195A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter'IPC').4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.5. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that while thecomplainant and her daughter...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »