Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anjali vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 + LPA 96/2026, CM APPL. 13061/2026, CM APPL. 13062/2026 &CM APPL. 13063/2026ANJALI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhijit Anand, Advocate (through VC).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Bajpai with Ms. Aashna Mehra, Mr. Vaisal Tripathi, Mr. Govind Singh Chauhan, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIATEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral)1. This intra court Appeal is filed against the order dated 06.01.2026(Impugned Order) passed in W.P.(C) 94/2026 (Writ Petition) whereby the Writ Petition filed by the Appellant has been dismissed.2. The Writ Petition was filed by the Appellant seeking direction to quashand set aside the Notification dated 31.08.2025 issued by the Respondents for the recruitment of the Officer Scale-I Post for the Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) and issue fresh notification by revisiting / fixing cut-off date of age limit as 01.06.2025 ...
Jyoti vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1575/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6373/2026 & CRL.M.A.JYOTI.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 31.01.2026 passed byDistrict Magistrate Court (West) in Eviction Petition No.1239/DCW/2025 tilted as Smt. Vijay Rani vs. Sh. Ajit Kumar and Anr. whereby she has been directed to be evicted from the premises in question within 30 days.2. The foremost grievance of the petitioner is to the effect that, shealready had an order from the concerned Magisterial Court before whom she had filed a petition under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act) and while considering the same, the learned Magisterial Court vide order dated 13.12.2025 has restrained r...
Braham Din Pandey & Ors. vs the Sahu Cooperative Urban Tc Soceity Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 26th February, 2026 Uploaded on: 28th February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 2095/2026 & CM APPL. 10245/2026 BRAHAM DIN PANDEY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.versusTHE SAHU COOPERATIVE URBAN TC SOCEITY LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for RCS Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Adv. for Society (through V/C)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners under Articles 226and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the impugned orderdated 22nd January, 2026 passed by the Chairman, Delhi Co-operative Tribunal (hereinafter DCT) in Appeal No. 032/2023/DCT titled Braham Din Pandey and Ors. v. The Sahu Co-operative Urban T/C Society Ltd. (hereinafter, the impugned order).3. Vide the impugned order, the DCT has dismissed the appeal fil...
M/S V.K.R. Constructions Pvt. Ltd vs Sharad Kesarwani & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 183/2025 M/S V.K.R. CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSHARAD KESARWANI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13184/2026 (On B/o Petitioner for Withdrawal of the Petition)1. This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner seekingwithdrawal of the present petition in view of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 20.02.2026 entered into between the parties.2. A copy of the same has been annexed alongwith the presentapplication.3. In view thereof, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the presentpetition.4. Application stands allowed in the above terms.CONT.CAS(C) 183/20255. The present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.6. The date already fixed i.e., 02.03.2026 stands cancelled.SACHIN DATTA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/atThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can...
Naresh Luthra vs Indira Gandhi National Open University
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2054/2026 & CM APPL. 10034/2026NARESH LUTHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Adv. (Standing counsel for DHCLSC) Ms. Neelampreet Kaur, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore, Mr. Kabir Dev, Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advocates.versusINDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY.....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. Mr. Amit Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, oninstructions, furnishes a copy of the communication dated 16.12.2025 to the Ministry of Education and certain other documents. In view thereof, nothing remains to be adjudicated.2. Petition stands disposed of.3. However, if the petitioner has any grievance, he shall be at liberty tofile a fresh application before the RTI authority. The same shall be considered in accordance with law.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/P/AMGThis is a digitally sig...
Nitin Panwar & Ors. vs State Govt Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 560/2026 NITIN PANWAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Garima Khetal, Advocate with Petitioner No. 1 in person.versusSTATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocate and WSI Ekta, P.S. Mangalpuri. Mr. Shivam Pahal and Mr. Harsh Sheokhand, Advocates with R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.20261. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel, acceptsnotice on behalf of the State. Mr. Shivam Pahal, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2 complainant.2. Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 11.11.2017.Due to matrimonial discord and temperamental differences between the parties, they have been living separately since 29.07.2022. A child was born from the wedlock on 18.11.2020.3. Respondent No. 2 lodged a formal complaint before the Crimeagainst Wome...
Vohra Rubber and Electricals vs M.K. Enterprises & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1945/2024 VOHRA RUBBER AND ELECTRICALS .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM.K. ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter becalled again at 02:30 PM.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/vAt 03:15 P.M.3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 1 submits that thepresent petition has become infructuous, as the disputes between the parties have been settled and the main suit has already been disposed of. Accordingly, the present petition has become infructuous.4. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter beingcalled twice. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/tp...
Munna vs the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 23.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 26.02.2026+ CRL.A. 49/2018 & CRL.M.A. 890/2018 MUNNA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ashu Sharma, Advocate.versusTHE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Vikram Singh, P.S. Welcome. Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate for Respondent no. 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C), the sole accused in SCNo. 14/17 (Old No.1643/16) on the file of the AdditionalSessions Judge, Special Electricity Court, Karkardooma Courts,New Delhi, assails the judgment dated 29.11.2017 as per whichSignature Not Verified CRL.A. 49/2018 Page 1 of 17the accused has been convicted for the offence punishable underSection 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act).2. The prosecution case is that, on 21.12.2006 at about05:05...
Vikas Tushir vs Lt Governer, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3076/2023 with CM APPL. 11994/2023, CM APPL. 50456/2023 and CM APPL. 64406/2024VIKAS TUSHIR .....Petitioner Through: (appearance not given)versusLT GOVERNER, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIAND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for StateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 26.02.20261. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish topress the present petition any further. He further submits that the term of Delhi Pharmacy Council is expiring on 1st November, 2026 and therefore, the election notification for the same should be issued in an expeditious manner.2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of while directingthe respondents no.1 to 3 to issue the notification for the next elections in accordance with its rules and regulations in an expeditious manner.AMIT BANSAL, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026dsThis is a digitally s...
Vijeta Gautam vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1396/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5618/2026 VIJETA GAUTAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sehgal, Ms. Prathana, Mr. Vivek Kumar Aurora, Ms. Tulika and Ms. S. Choubey AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates Inspector Dharmender Kumar, Vigilance, DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thepresent petition.2. As such, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:02:45...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »