Manoj vs State (Nct of Delhi)

MANOJ vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 26, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1256957

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1256957
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani
Decided On: Feb 26, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(CRL)/572/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MANOJ

Advocate Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Mr. Anshul Sharma, Mr. Amol Sinha

Respondent

State (Nct of Delhi)

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(crl) 572/2026, crl.m.a. 5429/2026 manoj .....petitioner through: mr. shannu baghel, advocate.versusstate (nct of delhi) .....respondent through: mr. kshitiz garg, advocate with mr. ashvini kumar, ms. chavi lazarus and mr. anshul sharma, advocates for mr. amol sinha, asc (criminal) for the state.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anup jairam bhambhaniorder% 26.02.2026notice on this petition was issued on 17.02.2026. status report is not on record. mr. kshitiz garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of mr. amol sinha, learned asc for the state has handed-up a report received from jail, which also encloses order dated 17.02.2026 passed by the concerned authorities rejecting the petitioner’s request for extension of parole. the same is taken on record. upon considering the contents of the petition and the report received from jail, this court is also not inclined to grant any further extension of parole to the petitioner.w.p.(crl) 572/2026 page 1 of 2the petition is accordingly dismissed. the parole granted runs-out today i.e. 26.02.2026. however, in view of the difficulty expressed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is granted time until saturday i.e. 28.02.2026 to surrender back to custody.anup jairam bhambhani, jfebruary 26, 2026/akw.p.(crl) 572/2026 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 572/2026, CRL.M.A. 5429/2026 MANOJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Advocate.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocate with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocates for Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Criminal) for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

ORDER

% 26.02.2026

Notice on this petition was issued on 17.02.2026. Status report is not on record. Mr. Kshitiz Garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC for the State has handed-up a report received from jail, which also encloses order dated 17.02.2026 passed by the concerned authorities rejecting the petitioner’s request for extension of parole. The same is taken on record. Upon considering the contents of the petition and the report received from jail, this court is also not inclined to grant any further extension of parole to the petitioner.

W.P.(CRL) 572/2026 Page 1 of 2

The petition is accordingly dismissed. The parole granted runs-out today i.e. 26.02.2026. However, in view of the difficulty expressed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is granted time until Saturday i.e. 28.02.2026 to surrender back to custody.

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ak

W.P.(CRL) 572/2026 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties MANOJ vs State (Nct of Delhi) Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani