Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naveen vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 834/2026 NAVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Sharma and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advs.versusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6386/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 834/20263. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at this stage seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application.4. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:12:11...
Deputy Comptroller and Auditor General of India Hr, Ir, Coordination a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2702/2026DEPUTY COMPTROLLER AND AUDITORGENERAL OF INDIA HR, IR, COORDINATIONAND LEGAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda, Mr. Aditya Hooda, Mr. Aayushman Aeron, Mr. Shaurya Banshtu, Advocates.versusSAURABH RANA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samarth Luthra, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13076/2026 [Exemption]1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2702/2026 & CM APPL. 13075/2026 [Stay]3. The Writ petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking setting-aside of the order dated 27.01.2026 (hereafter impugned order), passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereafter Tribunal) in O.A. 3745/2025.4. We have heard the learned counsels representing the parties atlength.5. There is consensus amongst the l...
Rishabh Anand and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1566/2026 RISHABH ANAND AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. D.D. Tripathi, Advocate alonwith petitioners in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6342/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1566/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 196/2024, registered at Police Station Dwarka South, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/377/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station Dwarka South,...
Janki Devi vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 535/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5028/2026JANKI DEVI.....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates for the State with SI Udit, P.S.Ranhola.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, seeking production of Ms. XXX.2. The respondents have filed the Status Report dated 25.02.2026,which states that the missing girl has come back to her house, and is presently staying with the petitioner. It is further stated that based on the statement of the missing girl, in FIR No. 73/2026, offences under Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) have also been added a...
Vidya Bhawan Girls Senior Secondary School Through Its Manager & Anr. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 97/2026, CM APPL. 13258/2026, CM APPL. 13259/2026, CM APPL. 13261/2026, CM APPL. 13262/2026 & CM APPL. 13272/2026VIDYA BHAWAN GIRLS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLTHROUGH ITS MANAGER & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Gupta, Ms. Payal Singh, Ms. Shipra Bhardwaj and Mr. Vivek Chandrasekar, Advocates.VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Pravin Bansal, Advocates for MCD.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 26.02.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. This intra court Appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 20.02.2026(Impugned Order) passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) Appellant. By the Impugned Order, the learned Single Judge has overruled the objection regarding the maintainability of the Writ Petition on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy to file an app...
Druck Media Pvt Ltd vs M/S Ahlers India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 200/2026 & I.A. 5334/2026 DRUCK MEDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyamvada Lonial, Adv.versusM/S AHLERS INDIA PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Prachi Vashisht, Adv. (throughVC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by nine months as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC ...
Nord Anglia Education Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Cir ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2686/2026, CM APPL. 13042/2026 & CM APPL. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Shashwat Bajpai & Mr. Mayank Chaturvedi, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INT. TAX2(2) (2), NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms.Naincy Jain, JSC, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSC and Mr Udit Dad, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 26.02.20261. Dr. Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that theimpugned order dated 14.02.2026 (mentioned as 23.12.2025), passed by the respondent-Assessing Officer under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is in the teeth of the binding directions issued by this Court on 14.01.2026 in petitioners earlier writ petition being W.P.(C) 13473/2025 titled Nord Anglia Education Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int. Tax 2(2) (2), New Delhi. He argued that the order...
Anil Dutt Sharma vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 688/2026, CRL.M.A. 6411/2026 & CRL.M.A.ANIL DUTT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Dwivedi, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates for State with ACP Jarnail Singh and Inspector Bhagwan Singh,PS ACB/GNCTD.CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. For convenience, it would be appropriate to extract the completeprayer clause of the petition. The same is as follows:In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court subject to law declared by Honble Supreme Court in Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. v. Computer Joint India Ltd., (2008) 11 SCC 108, in T. Nagappa v. Y.R. Murlidhar, (2008) 2 SCC (Crl.) 677, in Kalyani Baskar v. M.S. Sampoornam, (2007) 2 SCC 258 and in A. Shanmugam v. Ariya Kshatriya, (2012) 6 SCC 430, may be pleased to : -i) Permi...
Pratham Dev & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26th February, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 685/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6381/2026PRATHAM DEV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Sharma with Ms. Prince Gupta, Advocates with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with SI Charu Saini, PS Aman Vihar Mr. Rakesh Tiwari with Mr. Saroj Endlaw, Mr. Vikash Kumar, Mr. Manish Kumar Jha and Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.138/2021 datedSections 498A/406/506/34 IPC along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 23.11.2019, as perHindu rites and ceremonies. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock.3. Howeve...
Master Harsha D.R. Through His Father Sh. Shankarappa D.R. vs Sh. Asho ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~225 & 226* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 335/2026MASTER HARSHA D.R. THROUGHHIS FATHER SH. SHANKARAPPA D.R. .....Petitioner + CONT.CAS(C) 336/2026(226) MASTER LALITH KUMARTHROUGH HIS FATHER DEVARAJU N. .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioners are minor children suffering from rare geneticdisorders. These petitions allege that the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) is obligated to provide continuous treatment to the petitioners in view of their condition. It is pointed out that the said obligation clearly flows from the judgments/ orders dated 17.07.2019 inW.P.(C) 8503/2017 and 15.04.2019 in W.P.(C) 1860/2016.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that, of late, the ESIC hasbeen remiss in providing the requisite treatment and administering the concerned drugs to the petitioners.3. Learned counsel appearing for ESIC fairly submits that ESIC shallcontinue to provide the...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »