Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Y.P. Sethi vs Union Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4824/2025 Y.P. SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Dhawan and Mr. Mohit Miglani, Advocate with Petitioner in person.versusUNION BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. O.P. Gaggar and Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.01.20261. The Petitioner joined the services of the Respondent Bank as a Clerkon 9th July, 1971 and was promoted to the cadre of Officer with effect from 1st October, 1984. In the year 1993, a memorandum of charges was issued to him and disciplinary proceedings were initiated. Upon conclusion of the inquiry, the Disciplinary Authority, by order dated 11th February, 2000, imposed the penalty of dismissal from service. The Petitioners statutory appeal and review were rejected.2. Aggrieved, the Petitioner instituted W.P.(C) 2167/2002. During itspendency, by interim order dated 21st December, 2016, this Court directed reconsideration of the quantum of punishme...
Mohd Asif vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5081/2024 MOHD ASIF .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC with Mr. Kush Garg, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, GP for UOI Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Ruchita Srivastava, Ms. Neha Kamboj and Mr. Dev Aaseri, Advs. for R-2 and R-CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.01.2026 On instructions, a prayer for withdrawal of the petition is made. As such, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J JANUARY 29, 2026/gs/yr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:57:03...
Ex Sgt Chakresh Kumar Jain vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6940/2021 EX SGT CHAKRESH KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajit Kakkar and Mr. TejasBhonge, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, SCGC for UOI. Sgt Manish Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay(Air Force Legal Cell)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 29.01.20261. It is informed that the subject matter of this writ petition shall lie before the Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter, AFT).2. If that be so, let the petition be transferred to the AFT.3. The record be transmitted to the AFT forthwith.4. On the receipt of the record, the AFT after taking the orders of the Honble Chairman shall list the matter before the appropriate bench on 02.03.2026.5. The petition is disposed of for statistical purpose. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/tgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can b...
Ms. Manila Kundara vs Sh. Ajay Goyal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 08.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.01.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 529/2024, CRL.M.A. 11912/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16515/2024 MS. MANILA KUNDARA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ankur Raghav, Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advocates.versusSH. AJAY GOYAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satyanarayan Padhi, Advocate with Mr. Jitender Kumar, Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain, Mr. Arun Kumar Renu and Ms. Babita, Advocates. + CRL.REV.P. 538/2024, CRL.M.A. 12062/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16526/2024 MS. DEEPALI KUNDARA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ankur Raghav, Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advocates.versusSH. AJAY GOYAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satyanarayan Padhi, Advocate with Mr. Jitender Kumar, Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain, Mr. Arun Kumar Renu and Ms. Babita, Advocates. CRL.REV.P.529/2024 & connected matter Page 1 of 12CORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANT...
Master Ridhyansh Through Father Deep Singh vs Dr. Ratna Chakravarty, P ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 707/2023 MASTER RIDHYANSH THROUGH FATHER DEEP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal and Ms. Priyanka Handa, Advs. (through v/c)versusDR. RATNA CHAKRAVARTY, PRINCIPAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Adv. for R-1 (through v/c)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.01.20263. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.4. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:17:38...
Raisina Bengali School Society and Anr & Anr. vs Government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~23 & 24* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5431/2017 & CM APPL. 16273/2020 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL .....Petitioner GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4559/2020 & CM APPL. 16472/2020 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL SOCIETY AND ANR & ANR. .....Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.01.20261. These two writ petitions, though instituted at different points of time, W.P.(C) 5431/2017 having been filed in 2017 and W.P.(C) 4559/2020 in 2020, raise a common grievance and are accordingly being disposed of by W.P.(C) 5431/2017 & W.P.(C) 4559/2020 Page 1 of 4 this common order.2. At the time of filing, the petitions sought multiple reliefs. The livecontroversy, however, lies in a narrow compass. The Petitioners, as submitted by counsel, now only assail the action of the Directorate of Education (DoE), Government of NCT of Delhi, in appointing a Head of School (...
Sh. Sudershan vs Sh. Dharmender Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 236/2022 SH. SUDERSHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Nirban, Advs.versusSH. DHARMENDER SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajit Singh, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 5887/20261. Application under Section 151 of C.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking early hearing of the Appeal.2. It is submitted in the Application that CM APPL. 4784/2026 underOrder XLI Rule 5 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. has been filed for stay ofthe Judgment. Execution Proceedings are stated to be pending and an interim stay is prayed for. Hence the prayer is made that the Appeal listed on an early date.3. Learned counsel for the Respondents appears on advance Notice.4. Considering the submissions made in the Application, the same is allowed and the matter is taken up today for hearing.5. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 4785/20266. Exempti...
Dilshad vs Kishore Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 239/2025, CM APPL. 25358/2025, CM APPL. DILSHAD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Waseem Akhtar Khan, Advocate.versusKISHORE ARORA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER(ORAL) % 29.01.20261. This appeal has been preferred under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, with a delay of 807 days.2. The judgment and decree under challenge was passed on 17November 2022. The appeal has come to be filed in April 2025. The application for condonation of delay, from paras 1 to 5, advert to events which took place prior to passing of the judgment and decree under challenge on 17 November 2022, including the COVID-19 pandemic. We fail to understand how these aspects are at all relevant 1 CPC hereafter Signed By:RAJEEV RFA(COMM) 239/2025 Page 1 of 4 to a prayer for condonation of delay in filing...
Ravi Kant and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3117/2025 RAVI KANT AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Duggal, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr. Sauraj Yadav, Advocate for R- 2 and 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.2026 After some hearing, Mr. Abhishek Duggal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the pending criminal proceedings. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdraw, with liberty as aforesaid. PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 SS/SD/ CRL.M.C. 3117/2025 Page 1 of 1 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:05:00...
Cheshire Home India Delhi Unit vs Ms Virwati & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 600/2021 & CM APPL. 28148/2021 CHESHIRE HOME INDIA DELHI UNIT .....Petitioner Through: None.versusMS VIRWATI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 10/12 of the Contempt of CourtsAct seeks following prayers:- a. Initiate contempt proceedings against the alleged Contemnors/Respondents for wilfully and deliberately disobeying the direction of the Honble Trial Court vide Interim Order dated 18 March 2021 in CS SCJ 155/21; b. Pass any other or further order/s as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last two dates of hearing as well, i.e., on 02.05.2025 and 19.09.2025.5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in ...