Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ritu Kashyap vs State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 7/2024 RITU KASHYAP .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aatrayi Das, Ms. Ritu Kashyap, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sukrit Seth, Adv. for R- 4 to 6 Ms. Pavitra Kaur, Ms. Shreya Mishra, Adv.CORAM: JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) SH. KISHOR KUMAR (DHJS) ORDER % 18.03.2026 Matter is taken up through physical hearing as well as video conferencing.Statement of petitioner Ms. Ritu Kashyap with respect to the settlement of the petition has been recorded separately. In view of the statement of the petitioner, the matter be placed before Honble Court for further directions on 01.04.2026.KISHOR KUMAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MARCH 18, 2026/SMThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 11:11:10...
M/S Lpr Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1200/2026 & CM APPL. 5892/2026 M/S LPR COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Palu, Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma & Ms. Niyati Razdan, Advs.versusPEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amar Dave, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Usha Singh & Mr. Shahrukh Inam, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rajeev Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Pranati Bhatnagar & Mr. Dhairya B., Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 5893/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1200/2026 & CM APPL. 5892/2026 (stay) 3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ, orders or directions in the nature of writ of certiorari...
Ajay Dayal & Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~119 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 302/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2917/2026 AJAY DAYAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bimlesh Kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC for State. ASI Youdhvir. Mr. Pradeep Singh Solanki, Advocate for complainant.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The petitioners have preferred the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 271/2024 dated 14.05.2024, registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, as well as all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. 2. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Pradeep Singh Solanki, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 3. The ma...
Praveen Sahai & Anr. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 743/2026 PRAVEEN SAHAI & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Lal and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Jaivind Kumar, PS-NFC. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Rishabh and Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.198/2019 dated 10.09.2019 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at PS: New Friends Colony, Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement/ Statement recorded on 20.09.2025 before the learned Judicial Magis...
Kinshuk Pal vs Interglobe Aviation Limited (Indigo) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1232/2026 & CM APPL. 5989/2026KINSHUK PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Chandra PVG, Mr. Siddhant Sarwal, Mr. Akash Sharma, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Mr. Vineeth Varma Penmetsa, Ms. Madhavi. K, AdvsversusINTERGLOBE AVIATION LIMITED (INDIGO) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 29.01.2026CM APPL. 5990/2026 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1232/2026 & CM APPL. 5989/2026 1. The petitioner is a trained commercial pilot who was appointed as a Trainee Captain with respondent no.1 on 12.02.2025 under an employment agreement, subject to DGCA regulatory framework. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in month of September, 2025, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. He, therefore, sought an honourable exit, contingent upon acceptance byThis is a digitally ...
Esteem Project Private Limited vs Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 114/2026 ESTEEM PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ginny Jetley Rautray, Mr. Dharmendra Rautray & Mr. Arnav Tandon, Advs. versusBRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nishant Awana & Mr. Suraj Kundu, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 29.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR co...
Ms Sonali vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1201/2026, CM APPL. 5894-5895/2026 MS SONALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Durgesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Kalia, Mr. Ajit Kumar Kalia, Sr. Panel Counsel, Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, GP, Mr. Devesh Khara, Mr. Lakshya Bhatia, Mr. Devesh Dubey, Mr. Bismit Nayak, Advocates for Respondent no. 1 Ms. Saloni Jaggi, Advocate for R-2.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The Petitioner, a Scheduled Caste candidate appointed on compassionate grounds to the post of Stenographer in the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), has been served with a show cause notice dated 16th January, 2026, which is impugned in the present petition. 2. The impugned show cause notice has been issued on the ground that the Petitioner has not qualified the requisite shorthand test and has therefore allegedly failed to fulfil an essential condition of her app...
Mohd Tanvir vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 313/2026 MOHD TANVIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Advocate with Mr. Harsha, Advocate and Ms. Ankita Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Abhinav Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates. SI Mukul Yadav, P.S.: Keshav Puram. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2994/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 313/2026By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks furlough in case FIR No.335/2011 registered under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Keshav Puram, Delhi for a period of 03 weeks. 2. Vid order dated 19/20.12.2025, the petitioners applica...
Ravinder Kumar vs Prem Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 98/2026, CM APPL. 6109/2026 CM APPL. 6110/2026, CM APPL. 6111/2026 CM APPL. 6112/2026 RAVINDER KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given. versus PREM SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Regular First Appeal under Order XLI read with Section 96 CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for Setting aside Ex-parte Judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by learned ADJ-01, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to file a separate Appeal against the Judgment dated 03.01.2026, whereby his Application under Order 9 Rule 13 has been dismissed and against the Judgment dated 27.07.2023, whereby the Suit against the Appellant has been Decreed Ex-parte. 3. In view of the submissions made, the present Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty a...
M/S Lg Electronics India Limited vs Mr Manish Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~123 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 4/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3030/2026 M/S LG ELECTRONICS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Mr. Ravish Kumar, Ms. Nidhi Raj Bindra, Mr. Siddharth Kaushik & Mr. Prayaj Sharma, Advocates. versus MR MANISH YADAV .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal leave petition, with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedies in terms of the judgment of this Court in CRL.L.P. 215/2021 [Vijender Singh v. Mahender Pal @ Bindu, decided on 23.07.2025]. 2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of Mr. Subramaniums submission as above. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the maintainability or merits of the proposed remedy. 4. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismiss...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »