Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arunoudy Bhardwaj vs Shikha Awasthi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 256/2024 ARUNOUDY BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Arthava Brahma, Mr. Piyush Singh and Ms. Renu, Advocates.versusSHIKHA AWASTHI .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 3045/2026 (For taking on record the order dated 21.11.2025)1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioner seeks to bring onrecord the order dated 21.11.2025 in CR No. 1956/2022 passed by the learned JMPC-03, Mahila Court, Saket Courts, Delhi, whereby the parties had mutually settled all the issues.2. For the reasons stated in the present application as also seeing thenature of the order dated 21.11.2025, the same is allowed and the orderdated 21.11.2025 is taken on record.3. As such, the present application is disposed of.CRL.REV.P. 256/20244. In view of the aforesaid order passed in CRL.M.A. 3045/2026,learned counsel for the peti...
Bhoop Singh vs State C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 22.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.01.2026+ CRL.A. 582/2003 BHOOP SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Yudhishtar kahol, Mr. Kunal Kahol and Mr. Birender Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE C.B.I. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP for CBI with Mr.Aryan Rakesh and Ms. Atreyi C., Advs for CBI.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. This appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of CriminalProcedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the accused inC.C.No.130/2001 on the file of the Court of Special Judge, TizHazari Court challenging the conviction entered and sentencepassed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 7Signature Not Verified CRL.A. 582/2003 Page 1 of 25and 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of CorruptionAct, 1988 (the PC Act).2. The prosecution case is that on 22.04.1996, the accused,while working as Sub Inspector, Delhi P...
Retail Royalty Company and Anr vs Rupesh Vishvambar Paithane, Trading ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 192/2025 & I.As. 5719/2025, 12442/2025 RETAIL ROYALTY COMPANY AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Urfee Roomi, Mr. Ayush Dixit and Ms. Vanshika Bansal, Advocates.versusRUPESH VISHVAMBAR PAITHANE, TRADING AS CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES .....Defendant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocate. Mr. Rupesh Vishvambar Paithane, Defendant in person through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. Ms. Archana Gaur, learned counsel for the Defendant submits thatpursuant to order dated 23.01.2026 in I.A. 12442/2025, an affidavit of undertaking has been filed on 27.01.2026, however, the same is not on record. Let the same be brought on record during the course of the day. However, copy of the said affidavit of undertaking is handed over in Court and is taken on record.2. By this suit, Plaintiffs inter alia seek injunction against the Defendantand all others acting on its...
Sudeva Delhi Football Club vs All India Football Federation (Aiff)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2147/2025 and CM APPL. 10099/2025 SUDEVA DELHI FOOTBALL CLUB .....Petitioner Through: Mr Sanchit Sherawat, Adv.versusALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION(AIFF) .....Respondent Through: Mr Prateek K. Chadha, Mr Sreekar Aechuri, Mr Aniket Chauhaan, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw theinstant petition.2. Accordingly, the instant petition, along with pending application(s), ifany, stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JJANUARY 29, 2026aks/mjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:57:57...
Raj Kumar vs Sardar Iqbal Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 29/2020 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Sunil & Ms. Ankita Singh, Advs.versusSARDAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Mr. Vaibhav Chawla and Mr. Vipul Saini, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 05.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, 1958 seeks the following prayers: (a) Call for the records of the Eviction Petition E-93/17/15 titled as Sardar Iqbal Singh & Ors. Vrs. Sh. Raj Kumar from the court of Sh. Puneet Pahwa, Additional Rent Controller-02, Central District, Tis Hazari and Set aside the impugned Order dated 18.07.2019 passed therein and allow the application for leave to defend filed by the Petitioner; and/or(b) Pass such other order/directions as this Honble Court maydeem fit in the interest ...
Neelam Bhatia and Ors vs Ritu Bhatia and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 17th January, 2026Judgment pronounced on: 29th January, 2026+ CS(OS) 141/2022 & I.A. 3874/2022 NEELAM BHATIA AND ORS .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. M. P. Sinha, Mr. Govind Pareek and Mr. Arnav Jain, Advocates.versusRITU BHATIA AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Vikram Arora, Mr. Pawas Agarwal, Ms. Mansi Negi and Mr. Amish Tiwari, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALJUDGMENTAMIT BANSAL, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking the following reliefs:A. Pass a final decree to carry out partition of the Suit Property i.e. property/ piece of land admeasuring 1 Bigha, 2 Biswas part of Khasral Rect. No. 29, Killa No. 1911 situated in the area of Village Karawal Nagar, Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi;B. Pass a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants restraining them from selling, alienating, creating any third party interest, disposing...
Dharambir Singh & Anr. vs Hanshu Kalher & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 115/2025, CRL.M.A. 7735/2025 DHARAMBIR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Tiwari and Ms. Palak Agrawal, Advocates.versusHANSHU KALHER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rashi Agrawal, Ms. Neha Kapoor and Ms. Heena Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdrawpresent Petition in view of settlement arrived at between the Parties vide Settlement Deed dated 22.09.2025 arrived before Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the Respondents appears on advance Notice andendorses the factum of settlement inter se parties.3. Parties undertake to remain bound by the terms and conditions ofSettlement Deed dated 22.09.20254. In view of the submissions made, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.Pending Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.NEENA...
Farman vs Furqan &Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 140/2021, CM APPL. 25801/2022 FARMAN .....Appellant Through: NoneversusFURQAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for R-2 to 5CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.01.20261. In the Order dated 04.11.2024, it was noted that the Appellant hasdied.2. Thereafter, no steps have been taken on behalf of the Appellant toplace the LRs of the deceased Appellant on record.3. None is present on behalf of the Appellant today.4. Present Appeal alongwith pending Application, stands dismissed indefault and for non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JJANUARY 29, 2026NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:36:30...
Priyanka Sharma & Ors vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 22.01.2026Pronounced on : 29.01.2026Uploaded on : 29.01.2026+ FAO 59/2020PRIYANKA SHARMA & ORS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi CGSC with Ms. Swati Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Himanshi Singh and Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTCM APPL. 4630/2020 (delay of 690 days in filing the present appeal)1. The present application has been filed under Section 5 ofthe Limitation Act, 1963, read with Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 690 days in filing the accompanying appeal.2. Mr. Rajan Sood, learned counsel for the appellant, has submitted thatafter passing of the impugned judgment, the appellant could not file the18:59:45 FAO 59/2020 Page 1 of 10accompanying appea...
Janak Kumari Gandhi and Ors vs Anil Kumar Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 333/2025 JANAK KUMARI GANDHI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Ms. Simran Rao, Advs.versusANIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu (PC) along with Ms. Shaoni Das, Adv. Ms. Mrinalini Sen (SC) along with Ms. Aditi Singh, Adv. for DDACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.01.20261. During the course of hearing, it transpires that after filing of thepresent petition, a review petition has been filed by the respondent no.1. In the said review petition, the Division Bench has passed certain directions and also listed the matter on 11.05.2026 for compliance.2. In the circumstances, the present petition is disposed of.3. Needless to say, in the event of non-compliance, the petitioner wouldbe at liberty to urge this aspect before the concerned Division Bench or by initiating fresh proceedings.SACHIN DATTA, JJANUARY 29, 2026/ukThis is a digitally signe...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »