Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi vs Himani & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~130 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 48/2026 & CRL.M.As. 3022-25/2026 RAVI .....Revisionist Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni, Ms. Pranjal Abrol, Mr. Gurupal Singh, Ms. Moksha Sharma and Mr. Ayan Dasgupta, AdvocatesversusHIMANI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 After some arguments, Mr. Abhik Chimni, learned counsel for the revisionist, seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition, with liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to the revisionist before the learned Family Court, in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the present revision petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the maintainability, merits, or the availability of any remedy which the revisionist may seek to pursue.PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026/dy/SD/...
Ins Exe Piyush Kumar Singh & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1253/2026 CM APPL. 6214/2026 INS EXE PIYUSH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha, Ms. Shradha Mewati, Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi(Sr. Panel Counsel), Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Mr. Rajat Dubey, Advs. Mr Sanjay Kumar Insp, Mr Manju Nath SI, Mr Rahul Sinha SI CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 29.01.20261. This is an application filed with the following prayers: It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may please to allow this writ petition and may further be please to: i. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the DG CISF to re-fix the Petitioners pay along with all the consequential benefits as per Rule 05 and 06 of the CCS Revised Pay Ru...
Vishal Narender Pal vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 303/2026, CRL.M.A. 2918/2026-Exp VISHAL NARENDER PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Prasad, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate with SI Puran Singh, PS: Dabri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks direction to the respondent to release the petitioner on parole for a period of four weeks. 2. Though learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the order dated 23.01.2026 passed by this Court in CRL.M.A. 2542/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 3009/2026, whereby the applicant was given liberty to file a fresh application for grant of parole before the Jail Authority, however, since no such application ...
Pooja and Ors vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~116 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 737/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2937/2026 POOJA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not given.versusTHE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Priyanka Saini, P.S. Bindapur.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 Bhupi/KA/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:04:50...
Shabana Alam Through G.P.a Holder Mr Jamshed Alam vs M/S Associated Jo ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 29/2026 & CM APPL. 6174/2026 CM APPL. 6175/2026 SHABANA ALAM THROUGH G.P.A HOLDER MR JAMSHED ALAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Mr. Adit Sharma, Advs. versusM/S ASSOCIATED JOURNAL LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Mr. Dipu Kumar Jha, Mr. Rahul Tomar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Mr. Mohit Gupta, counsel for petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise pleas during arguments at the post trial stage. 2. Needless to say, observations made in the impugned orders dated 16th December 2025 and 25th July 2025, related to the merits of the matter shall not be determinative of the issues in question. 3. The Trial Court, after completion of the evidence, shall take a final view on the issues. 4. The Trial Court is expected to proceed with the matter. 5. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted. 6. ...
Sanjeev Khatri & Anr. vs State,Delhi Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 804/2024 SANJEEV KHATRI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusSTATE,DELHI POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Chetan Dahiya, Adv. along with SI Mahesh. R-2 and R-3 with their counsel CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 370/2017, registered at Police Station Kalkaji, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 287/304A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 2. The petitioners and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Kalkaji, Delhi. 3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that petitioner no. 1 was carrying out constructions work on his property and, on 0...
Delhi Public School Mathura Road Through Its Chairman vs Director of E ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 177/2019, CM APPL. 868/2019 & CM APPL. 15982/2019DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL MATHURA ROAD THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta, Advocate.versusDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Ms. Archana Chaudhary & Mr. Prateek Tyagi, Advocates for DOE.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.01.20261. This writ petition is directed against order dated 31st December, 2018,whereby the Directorate of Education held that the re-employment of Sh. Manohar Lal, Principal, Delhi Public School, Mathura Road, beyond the age of superannuation was illegal.2. The operation of the impugned order was stayed by this Court byorder dated 11th January, 2019.3. During the pendency of the present proceedings, the extended term ofSh. Manohar Lal has come to an end.4. In view of the above, the challenge to the impugned order has beenrendered infru...
Novartis Ag & Anr. vs Chhabra Healthcare Solutions Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 68/2022NOVARTIS AG & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Jha, Mr. Abhay Tandon and Ms. Kriti Chulet, Advocates.versusCHHABRA HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED.....Defendant Through: Ms. Archana Sahadeva and Ms. Shiwangi Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.01.2026I.A. 2501/20261. This joint application is filed on behalf of the parties under OrderXXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording the settlement.2. The present suit has been instituted by the Plaintiffs inter alia forpermanent injunction restraining Defendant from infringing Plaintiff No. 1s Indian Patent No. 229051 (suit patent IN051).3. No written statement has been filed by the Defendant.4. It is stated in the application that during the pendency of the suit, theterm of the suit patent IN051 expired on 16.01.2023, owing to which parties have amicably settled all their d...
M/S Jmd Cranes vs M/S the Indure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~48* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 226/2025M/S JMD CRANES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nidish Gupta, Advocate throughVC.versusM/S THE INDURE PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 5906/2026 (for withdrawal of petition)2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Article227 of the Constitution of India, seeking withdrawal of the present petition.3. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent despite service of theadvance notice.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition bedisposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to take appropriate remedies.5. Keeping in view the submissions made by ld. Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought, in accordance with law.6. The next date of hearing before Cou...
Gurvinder Singh & Anr. vs Amrit Mohan Prasad Director General Sashastr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 237/2025 GURVINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby Varghese, Mr. Jasmeet Singh Randhawa and Ms. Rashi, Advocates.versusAMRIT MOHAN PRASAD DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHASTRASEEMA BAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shrey Sharawat, SPC along with Mr. Yash Chaturvedi, Advocate forUOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that directions containedin the order dated 24.07.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 601/2023 stands complied with. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Consequently, no orders are required to be passed in the presentpetition; the same is, accordingly, disposed of.SACHIN DATTA, JJANUARY 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Se...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »