Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ayush Sahu vs Deeksha Kapoor
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1180/2025 AYUSH SAHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv. (through v/c)versusDEEKSHA KAPOOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akash Mehta, Ms. Pooja, Mr. Keshvam Punj, Mr. Jai Kharpran and Ms. Pankhuri Saini, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 12:30:53...
Sanjay Sharma vs Shyam Charan & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 529/2018, CM APPLs 47587/2018, 32479/2019 SANJAY SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Cheema Sharma, Advocate.versusSHYAM CHARAN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Dubey, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.01.20261. On the last date of hearing, this Court noted that the parties hadarrived at an amicable settlement vide Compromise-cum-Memorandum of Understanding dated 13.11.2025, in terms whereof the appellant agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- to the respondents towards full and final settlement of all claims.2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant through V.C. submitsthat a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- has already been received by the respondents, while the balance amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- is yet to be disbursed. He further refers to the order dated 27.11.2018, wherein this Court had recorded that the award amount had been deposited by the appellant before the Employees Compensation Commissione...
Aditya Birla Capital Limited vs Sehgal Wheels Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 436/2025 and I.A. 25888/2025 ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akash Kumar, Advocate.versusSEHGAL WHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Rout, Standing Counsel for R6.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. Mr. Akash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Pending application stands disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026/jgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:11:09...
Govt. of N.C.T.of Delhi & Ors. vs Prem Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11348/2006, CM APPL. 11195/2026 GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, CGSC with Mr. Kautilya Birat, Adv. with SI Dharampal (DP)versusPREM SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mahur and Mr. Harkesh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 25.04.2026 The case is being listed today as 3 March 2026 was declared a Holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27 February 2026.C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The sole respondent in this case expired 12 years ago. His LRs are not on record.2. Accordingly, the writ petition is abated and is disposed of as such.C.HARI SHANKAR, J.OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.APRIL 25, 2026/aky Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:28.04.2026 18:18:11...
Raj Gutpa & Ors. vs Chief Secretary Govt. of N.C.T
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~R12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11933-11935/2006 RAJ GUTPA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusCHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF N.C.T .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. There is no representation on behalf of the parties.2. Hence, the present Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 30, 2026 s.godara/ra This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:04:53...
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors vs Ravinder Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~R4* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16667-16668/2006 and CM APPL. 17250/2008 GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: None.versusRAVINDER KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. The parties remains unrepresented.2. Hence, the present Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.JANUARY 30, 2026 s.godara/ra This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:05:07...
Randhir Singh vs Harvinder & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 415/2013 Date of decision: 30th January 2026 RANDHIR SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Adv with Mr. Ritik Singh, Adv.versusHARVINDER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shruiti Jain, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Pankaj Seth, SC for respondent no.3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENT% ANISH DAYAL, J. (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed by insured claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Claim No.1100/2008 by impugnedjudgment and award dated 29th September 2012. The Tribunal awarded acompensation of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.2. The accident occurred on 8th November 2008 at about 4.30 p.m.when appellant was travelling from Delhi to Saharanpur on his motorcycle along with his son and son in-law when a Wagon R coming from Saharanpur side at high speed, in a rash and negligent manner, hit the motorcycle, causing all thre...
Kapil Magoo vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15261/2024 KAPIL MAGOO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Vig, Adv.versusREGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv for Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil) GNCTD.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioner Mr. Kapil Magoo has filed the present writ petitionseeking direction to the Registrar Cooperative Societies (hereinafter RCS) and to Sri Durga Cooperative Group Housing Society (hereinafter the Society), as also to Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter, DDA), for allotment of the flat bearing no. Plot No.6A, Sector-11, Dwarka, New Delhi- 10075 situated in the Society.3. The case of the Petitioner is that he was enrolled as a member of theSociety and had opted for a three bedroom flat for which the cost was fixed at Rs.19.50 lakhs in 2003. The entire amount of Rs.19.55 lakhs is...
M/S Raamkay Crop Science Solutions Pvt Ltd vs Mr Luru Prasad Jaiswal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1635/2025 M/S RAAMKAY CROP SCIENCE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. DCosta, Advocate.versusMR LURU PRASAD JAISWAL .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the Distributor Agreement dated 23.05.2021 (hereinafter Agreement). Clause 21 of the aforesaid Agreement contains the arbitration clause. It further provided in the arbitration clause that seat of arbitration shall be at New Delhi.2. Upon a dispute having arisen between the parties, petitioner invokedarbitration by giving a legal notice dated 21.08.2025 in terms of Section 21 of the Act, which did not elicit any response by the respondent. The petitioner has, therefore, approached this Court...
M/S Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd vs Sh. Manoj Kumar Sharma S/O ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1824/2025 M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mehvish Khan, Mr. Aman Choudhary and Ms. Kanak Dixit, Advs. Mob: 9319212148 Email: [email protected]. MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA S/O SITARAM SHARMA PROPRIETOR OF SHARMA AND ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Mr. Bharat Bagga, Mr. Chirag Singhal and Ms. Shreya Garg, Advs. for R-2 Mob: 9999558855CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 30.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute, and seeks liberty to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downlo...