Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Orange Mantra Technology Pvt Ltd vs Evok Homes Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~7 & 8* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2148/2025 EVOK HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent RSG ONLINE PRIVATE LIMITED .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 30.01.2026 ARB.P. 2148/20251. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that he seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Liberty, as sought, is granted.3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has been unable to ensure that the Respondent is served.5. He seeks and is granted a further opportunity to ensure that service is effected upon the Respondent through all permissible modes within a period of two weeks from today.6. List on 12.03.2026.7. A photocopy of the order passed today be kept in the connected matter. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J JANUARY 30, 2026/nd/va/jk...
Sunil Yadav vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4965/2025 SUNIL YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Aarushi Singh, Ms.Riya Parihar and Mr. Chirag Sahni, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Annu. Mr. Krishna Datta Multani, Mr. Joel James, Ms. Ankita Yadav and Mr. Harshit Garg, Advs. for victim.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.01.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/A/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 11:50:12...
Smt. Nirmal Gupta & Anr. vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19542/2025 and CM APPL. 81513/2025. SMT. NIRMAL GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shantanu Awasthi and Mr. Shikhar Mittal, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. S. D. Sanjay, ASGI with Mr. Khushal Kolwar, Mr. Shubham Prakash Mishra, Mr. Akshat Aggarwal, Mr. Dheeraj Singh (Special Counsel) and Mr. Shiven Verma and Mr. Saurabh Malhotra, Advs. for R-1, 2 & 5. Mr. G. S. Oberoi, ASC with Mr. Ankur Sharma and Mr. J. S. Oberoi, Advs. for DDA.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.01.20261. The Court earlier directed for issuance of notice. Thereafter, on a mentioning by the petitioner, interim directions were passed, and the reply was called for. The respondents, thereafter, presented their reply.2. The matter was called out on 19.01.2026 and thereafter the learned Additional Solicitor General (ASG) was heard on 27.01.2026. Today as well extensive submissions wer...
Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd vs Sandeep Paul & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~2 (Regular)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) 530/2009 MOTILAL OSWAL SECURITIES LTD .....Appellant Through: None.versusSANDEEP PAUL & ORS .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 30.01.20261. The present appeal is one of the oldest matters listed for hearing in the category of Regular Matters.2. The matter was called out twice in the revised call, however, none appeared on behalf of the parties.3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Interim order(s), if any, stands discharged. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JANUARY 30, 2026 yk/htThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:15:54...
Vikas Jain vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5058/2025 VIKAS JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with SI Akash Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.01.20261. The Court has been informed that anticipatory bail was filed. However, in the meantime, he was arrested.2. Hence, the present bail application has become infructuous.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/sk/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 11:50:13...
Mirik Healthfood Pvt Ltd vs Moti Agencies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 507/2012 MIRIK HEALTHFOOD PVT LTD .....AppellantversusMOTI AGENCIES .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the followingprayers: - a) Set aside the judgment order dated 21.07.2012 passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Court in suit No. 483 of 2008; b) Summon the record in Suit No. 483 of 2008; c) Pass such other or further order as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the matter.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant today.4. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on previous dates of hearing, i.e., 10.12.2024, 17.03.2025, 01.05.2025, and 19.09.2025, as well.5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.6. Pending application(s), if any, also sta...
Pankaj Gupta & Anr vs Magan Wati & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 455/2018 PANKAJ GUPTA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not given.versusMAGAN WATI & ORS .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, 1958, (No. 59 of 1958) seeks the following prayers:- a) Allow the present Petitioner; b) Set aside the order dated 21.03.2018 passed by order dated 21.03.2018 passed by the Court of CCJ cum ARC, Pilot Court (Central District), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi presided over by Ms. Susheel Bala Dagar, in E No. 342/2017; c) Summon the lower court record; d) Pass any other further prayers that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.4. Leave granted.5. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed...
Union of India & Ors. vs Jwo Brijesh Singh Panwar (Retd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 30.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 1327/2026 CM APPL. 6470/2026 CM APPL. 6471/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramjee Pandey, SPCversusJWO BRIJESH SINGH PANWAR (RETD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prachi Payal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 6471/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1327/20263. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 19.07.2023[impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1369/2020 titled as MWO Brijesh Singh Pawar (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Respondent has been granted the benefit of the disability element of pension for Prima...
Love Verma & Ors. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 783/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3110/2026 LOVE VERMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Purvi, PS Tilak Nagar and ASI Krishan Lal. Mr. Pramesh Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 738/2021 dated 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 28.03.2019, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, due to certain temperamental differences, the parties could not live together and started living separately afte...
Amit@Point vs State of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 414/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3150/2026 AMIT@POINT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yugansh Mittal, DHCLSC and Mr. Keshav Poonia, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/Inspector Sudhir Rathi and SI Anju, PS NIA CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 1198/2024 of PS Narela Industrial Area for offence under Section 137(2)/65(1)/351 BNS, read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act.2. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that the accused/applicantconsistently over a period of time stalked and scared the 14 year old girl to develop relations with him. The FIR was registered on the basis of missing report lodged by father of the prosecutrix, suspecting that the prosecutrix BAIL APPLN. 414/2026 Page 1 of 3 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »