Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madangir Cooperative Society Through Its President vs Delhi Developmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~125 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1003/2026 & CM APPL. 4873/2026, CM APPL. 4874/2026 MADANGIR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr. Pulkit Jolly, Mr. Naval Goel, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal (SC for DDA) with Mr. Abhay (DDA) with Mr. Nitish Kumar Danda, Adv.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari, Mandamus, and/or any other Writ or direction for quashing the Impugned Demolition Notice dated 14.01.2026 and for protection of the Petitioners peaceful possession over the subject land bearing Khasra No. 6/2, Madangir Village, New Delhi;... 2. Mr. Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in the present case, the respondent has issued a Demolition Notice date...
Satyan Kapoor vs Usha Rani Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 58/2023, I.A. 1589/2023, I.A. 6148/2024 SATYAN KAPOOR .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashok Chapparia and Mr. Shanto Mukerjee, AdvocatesversusUSHA RANI JAIN & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Joney, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Ms. Anamika Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Pulkit Sharma and Mr. Rakesh Mahajan, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The instant suit has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) Pass a decree of specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 03.11.2022 entered into between the Plaintiff and Defendants thereby directing the Defendants, to receive the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed in respect of the Suit Property being Property No.M-15 measuring 350 sq. yds. situated at Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi- 110024, in favour of the Plaintiff and in case the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 fai...
Suhani Sheikh and Anr vs Devender Malhotra
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 11/2023, CM APPL. 787/2023 (stay), CM APPL.788/2023 (delay), CM APPL. 40999/2023 (for impleadment), CM APPL. 41000/2023 (stay) SUHANI SHEIKH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: NoneversusDEVENDER MALHOTRA .....Respondent Through: Counsel for Respondent (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL.41001/2023 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. RFA 11/2023 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the decree already stands executed and the possession has been handed over to the Respondent. 4. None is present on behalf of the Appellants. 5. The Appeal along with the Applications, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Porta...
Renew Wind Energy AP2 Pvt Ltd vs Solar Energy Corporation of India Lim ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1103/2026 with CM APPL. 5441/2026 RENEW WIND ENERGY AP2 PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Mr. Girik Bhalla, Ms. Priyanka Vyas and Mr. Anuj Berry, Advocates.versusSOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Bardhan, Ms. Somya Sahani, Ms. Ritika Singh and Ms. Rashmi Vaish, Advocates for R-1.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 29.01.20261. This order may be read in continuation with the order passed by this Court on 27th January, 2026. 2. Counsel for the parties inform the Court that the application for interim relief filed by the respondent no.1 before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) could not be taken up on 28th January, 2026 and is now posted on 5th February, 2026. 3. Counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that the respondent no.1 has informed its bankers that no pr...
Vikas Gumber vs Commissioner of Cgst, Anti Evasion Branch, Delhi East
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 39/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2430/2026 VIKAS GUMBER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akshita Jain, Adv.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CGST, ANTI EVASION BRANCH, DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Khatri, Ms. Shelly Dixit and Ms. Tracy Sebastian, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application. 2. Bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 3. The date fixed, i.e. 06.02.2026 stands cancelled. 4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/A/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 1...
Rajan Bhatia vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 231/2024 and CM APPL. 1054/2024 RAJAN BHATIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Raghav, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji Senior Panel Counsel with Mr Aniruddha Ghosh Ms Surabhi Tuli, Advs for R- 1. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari advocate with Mr. Mukul Aryan, Advs for R-2. Mr Akshay Makhija, Sr Adv with Mr. Kunal Kalra, Adv and Mr Shekhar Gupta law officer BPCL R-3. Mr. Mohit Sharma, Adv for R-4. Mr. Tushar Sannu, standing counsel along with Ms. Shambhavi vatsa, Advocate for R-5.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 29.01.20261. The petitioner claims to occupy a rear site flat located at 1st Floor at a building at 3B/6 Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi 110002. The petitioner submits that the building on its left adjoins a petrol pump (Raizada Motors).This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Co...
Vinod Kumar B.a. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 294/2026, CM APPL. 1398/2026 VINOD KUMAR B.A. .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev and Mr. Rajkumar Maurya, Advs. Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 29.01.20261. Mr. Balendu Shekhar, learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have decided to grant appointment to the petitioner as a Constable (General Duty) in Border Security Force, subject to fulfilment of conditions as per Rules. 2. Noting the said submission, we dispose of the petition along with pending application on the ground that the relief as sought for has been satisfied.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/srThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the orde...
Alka Roy vs Seema Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 83/2026 & I.A. 2403/2026, I.A. 2404/2026, I.A. 2405/2026, I.A. 2406/2026ALKA ROY .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankit Kishore, Advocate Mob: 9931844050 Email: [email protected] versusSEEMA SHARMA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that liberty may be granted to him to withdraw the present suit and file a fresh suit, so that the Sale Deed in favour of defendant no. 2 can also be challenged in the suit for partition. 2. Accordingly, the present suit, along with the pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.MINI PUSHKARNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026 akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the D...
Amiruddin @Amir vs State of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~112 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 380/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2929/2026 AMIRUDDIN @AMIR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Parul Rohatgi, Advocate.versusSTATE OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State. Mr. Ajay Bharti, Advocate for complainant. Insp. Mintu Singh, PS-SP Badli.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. An adjournment was sought in this petition at first call. The adjournment was refused, but the matter was passed over to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to appear. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing on second call, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. As the petitioner is not represented, the bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. It may be noted that the petitioner had, very recently, filed a bail application [BAIL APPLN. 43/2025] in which the following order was passed on 07.01.2026: After some arguments, ...
Shri Purshotam Behl vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 113/2026 & I.A. 2384/2026 SHRI PURSHOTAM BEHL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Adv. (through VC)versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Mr. Anil Kumar Goyal, Ms. Ramya S. Goel & Ms. Sanya Sharma, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 29.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning t...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »