Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Proshottam Lal Mehta vs Dda
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2074/1995 PROSHOTTAM LAL MEHTA .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusDDA .....Respondent Through: Ms Manika Tripathy SC for DDA with Mr Aakash Mohar Adv and Mr Gautam Yadav Adv and Mr Saksham Singh AdvCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.01.20261. On 24.11.2025 a Court notice was issued to the petitioner as well ashis counsel.2. The Service Report states that no such person resides at the givenaddress.3. For the said reasons, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution withliberty to the petitioner to revive in case the petitioner is interested in prosecuting the same.JASMEET SINGH, JJANUARY 30, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 13:09:44...
Nkb Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs Northern Railway & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 74/2025 NKB INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Tarun Gupta & Mr. Hirday Virdi, Advs. (through VC).versusNORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. B. Ramaswamy, CGSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.01.20261. The decree stands satisfied.2. The petition stands disposed of as infructuous.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:09:33...
Ramesh Chand vs Subhashish Panda
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~77 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 810/2023, CM APPL. 10288/2026 RAMESH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Hina Rajput, Adv.versusSUBHASHISH PANDA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv. for DDA Mr. Abhinav Singh, Adv. for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 3904/2022 & CM APPL. 10283/2026 RAMESH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Hina Rajput, Adv.versusDDA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel, GNCTD Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana, Mr. Udita Singh Chauhan, Advs. for MCD Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv. for DDACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 13.02.2026 CM APPL. 10287/2026 & CM APPL. 10282/20261. Ms. Rajput, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file photographs to show that the orders have not been complied with.2. Let the same be done before the next date of hearing.3. List on 28.07.2026. JA...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. vs Unison Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 197/2023 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. Tanpreet Gulati & Ms. Aprajita, Advs.versusUNISON HOTELS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Mr. Arpit Kumar Singh, Mr. Shivank Diddi & Mr. Arsh Alok, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 23.03.2026 I.A. 3064/2026 On request of learned senior counsel for the applicant/petitioner, put up on 28.05.2026. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 23, 2026 Ch This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 16:00:57...
Rohit Singh vs Vishal Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1035/2023 & CM APPL. 33658/2023 ROHIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: None.versusVISHAL GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar, Advocate for R-1 (through VC). Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Mr. Love Kesh Kukreja and Mr. Anmol Gupta, Advocates for Bank of Baroda (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter is passed over and be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/nd/tp At 2:35 PM3. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 0...
T. Prasad Rao Dora vs Ather Parwez Ansari
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. 1/2022 & I.A. 2535/2022 ATHER PARWEZ ANSARI .....Petitioner BIMAL KUMAR MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Advocate Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate. + O.M.P. 5/2022 & I.A. 10502/2022 T. PRASAD RAO DORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kotla Harshavardhan, Ms. Gayatri Gupta and Ms. Divija Mahajan, Advs ATHER PARWEZ ANSARI .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 30.01.20261. Learned Counsels for the Petitioners in both the matters seek permission to withdraw the present Petitions with liberty to take recourse to the remedies available to the parties in accordance with law.2. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted.3. The Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn along with the pending applications, if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J JANUARY 30, 2026 Rahul...
Praveen Gupta vs Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12259/2021 & CM APPL. 38360/2021, CM APPL. PRAVEEN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Jain, alongwith Dr. S.K. Yadav, Mr. Arjun Drall and Ms. Priyanka Yadav, Advs.versusREGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, ASC - DDA, alongwith Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak, Advs. for DDA. Ms Avni Singh Panel Counsel for GNCTDCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The allotment of flats in Sri Durga Cooperative Group HousingSociety, which has been challenged in this case, has already taken place and the decision on the Petitioners expulsion from the membership of the said Society is already pending before the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal (hereinafter DCT).3. In view thereof, the present writ petition is infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed ...
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited vs Colossal Properties ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ EX.P. 52/2020 and EX.APPL.(OS) 921/2020 and EX.APPL.(OS) 1022/2021 HDFC BANK LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra and Ms. Prachi Dutta, Advocates with Mr. Neeraj Singh, Assistant Vice-President, Infrustructure Department of the Bank.versusCOLOSSAL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Ms. Rabina Rai and Mr. Punith Jha, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. Ms. Sonali Malhotra, leaned counsel appearing on behalf of thedecree holder, on instructions, from Mr. Neeraj Singh, Assistant Vice- President, Infrastructure Department, HDFC Bank, who has joined through VC, submits that the present execution petition stands satisfied.2. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as satisfied.3. Pending applications also stand disposed of. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026/jgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delh...
Naveen & Anr. vs Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelli ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 15th December, 2025 Pronounced on:30th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1872/2024, CRL.M.A. 18198/20241. NAVEEN S/o Sh. Shiv Lal Proprietor M/s Aarti Traders, Tej Colony, Tehsil Camp, Panipat, Haryana-132103.2. SURAJ KUMAR S/o Sh. Shiv Lal Tej Colony, Tehsil Camp, Panipat, Haryana-132103. ....Petitioners Through: Ms. Hitanshi and Mr. Yash Tewari, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE Through its Superintendent/Senior Intelligence Officer, Delhi Zonal Unit, DGGI, MTNL Building, Near Manipal Hospital Sector-6, Dwarka, Delhi-110075. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Vipul Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL) 1872/2024 Page 1 of 211. Petition under Article 226/227 Constitution of India has been filed forsetting aside of the Summons dated 20....
Sachin Gupta vs Registrar Cooperative Society and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 11380/2021&CM APPL. 35047/2021, CM APPL. SACHIN GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harshit Jain, alongwith Dr. S.K. Yadav, Mr. Arjun Drall and Ms. Priyanka Yadav, Advs.versusREGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohagti & Ms. Chandrika Sachdev, Advs. for GNCTD.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioners case is that they were members of the Sri DurgaCooperative Group Housing Society (hereinafter the Society) and had paid substantial amounts towards the land and subsequent construction thereof. This payment of the amount, however, was disputed by the Society.3. According to the Petitioners, several members of the Society, includingthe Petitioners had been expelled from the membership of the Society. There ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »