Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tej Pal Singh vs Shayam Sunder Gupta
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1434/2025 TEJ PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv.versusSHAYAM SUNDER GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Mehra, Mr. Jagjeet Singh and Mr. Devansh Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Let a reply be filed on behalf of the respondent before the next date of hearing, with an advance copy served upon the opposite side.3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 11:38...
Randhir Singh vs Government of Nct Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10417/2024 & CM APPL. 42789/2024 RANDHIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. L. B. Rai, Mr. Satvik Rai, Mr. Vineesh Tyagi & Mr. Kartik Rai, Advs.. (9810614546)versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Diwan & Mr. Piyush Jhanji, Advs. for R-1 & 2 (9811937371).CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioner has moved the present writ petition seeking declarationthat the acquisition of land of the Petitioner in Khasra No.27/19 admeasuring 4 bighas and 16 biswas in village Bakkarwala, West Delhi, has lapsed as the possession has not been taken and no compensation has been paid till date.3. Reliance is placed upon a similar order dated 4th September, 2025 passed in W.P. (C) 8022/2024 titled Dhanraj Sehrawat v. Government of NCT Delhi And Anr. in respect of the same village.4. In paragraph No.11 of ...
Asian Patent Attonrneys Association (Indian Group) vs Registrar Genera ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1950/2018 & CM APPL. 8076/2018 ASIAN PATENT ATTONRNEYS ASSOCIATION (INDIAN GROUP) .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shrawan Chopra, Mr. Vibhav Mithal, Mr. Achyut Tewari, Ms. Krisha Baweja and Mr. Ritik Raghuvanshi, Advs.versusREGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .....Respondent Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Mr. Bhrigu A. Pamidighantam, Mr. Vaibhav Gandhi, Ms. Rupam Jha, Ms. Medhavi Bhatia and Mr. Kartikey Puneesh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT(ORAL) % 30.01.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This writ petition assails Administrative Order dated 17 November 2016 issued by the Registrar (Original) of this Court, the relevant part of which reads as under:We have noticed that the Registry is accepting fresh Execution Petitions even in cases in which money decrees have been passed for a sum upto 2 crores. Since the pecuniar...
Shobha and Others vs Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 1140/2023 SHOBHA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: NoneversusYOGESH KUMAR SHARMA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.01.2026 None appears in this case. Previous record also shows multiple consecutive absences on behalf of petitioners. It seems that petitioners are not interested to pursue this matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed is default. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JANUARY 30, 2026/as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:11:46...
Sh Arun Singh vs Mrs Saguna Puri Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 757/2023 SH ARUN SINGH .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Rashika Ved and Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocates.versusMRS SAGUNA PURI SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Himanshu Yadav, Mr. Shikhar Upadhyay, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 30.01.20261. The instant suit is one for partition of the suit property bearing the entire Ground Floor, garage, mezzanine floor over the garage block of Property No. C-284, Defence Colony, New Delhi.2. It is stated that during the pendency of the present Suit, the parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 20.11.2025. The terms of the said Settlement Agreement are reproduced herein and the same reads as under: 3. This Court has perused the Settlement Agreement dated 20.11.2025 and finds that the said Settlement Agreement is a lawful agreement.4. The parties are bound by the terms of the aforesaid Sett...
M/S Vpssr Facilities vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + W.P.(C) 10713/2024, CM APPL. 44128/2024, CM APPL. 71743/2024 & CM APPL. 68268/2025 M/S VPSSR FACILITIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh and Ms. Bimla Sharma, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjib Kumar Mohanty and Mr. Sarvesh P. Shrivastava, Advocates for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALAMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- Signed By:VIVEK W.P.(C) 10713/2024 Page 1 of 82. At the outset, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, counsel appearing on behalfof the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is confining his challenge in the present writ petition only to the extent that the petitioner has been debarred from future bid/tenders conducted by the respondent/Railways.3. The petitioner, being the successful bidder, was awarded a Contractby the Railways for performance of services/wo...
J J Imprints Pvt Ltd Through Sarwan Jain vs State Bank of India Throug ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13225/2024 J J IMPRINTS PVT LTD THROUGH SARWAN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Ashwani Kumar Singla, AdvversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, SC for SBI along with Mr. Akshit Kapur, AoR and Ms. Riya Sood, AdvCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following reliefs: i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction to the State Bank of India to reverse the entry i.e. repay in the account from which it was received the amount (the petitioner is ready to execute indemnity if so required). ii) For issuance of interim orders to transfer the funds to an interest bearing time deposit of 2 years.2. The facts are that the petitioner was to pay a sum of Rs. 15 lakhs toM/s Vardhman Agencies on account of business dealings. However, the petitioner paid the amount online ...
Vaibhao Pratap Singh@ Prince vs Shubham Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 322/2024 & CM APPL. 45851/2024 VAIBHAO PRATAP SINGH@ PRINCE.....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv. along with Appellant in person Mr. Karan Valecha, Adv.versusSHUBHAM KUMAR & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raj Gaurav and Mr Mukul Seth, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.01.20261. On 10.11.2025, the parties entered into settlement with theintervention of Samadhan, whereunder the Appellant agreed to pay the settled amount of 5,55,000/- by way of RTGS/NEFT/online bank transfer in the following manner : a) A sum of 1,50,000/- at the time of signing of the Settlement Agreement vide Cheque No. 000054 dated 10.11.2025 drawn on HDFC Bank, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow Branch b) A sum of 1,35,000/- on 15.11.2025 c) A sum of 1,35,000/- on 14.12.2025 d) A sum of 1,35,000/- on 14.01.20262. Undisputedly, an amount of 1,50,000/- has already been ...
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors vs Const. Chet Ram
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11368/2006 GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with SI. Dharampal Pairvi, Officer TrafficversusCONST. CHET RAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mahur and Mr. Harkesh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER% 25.04.2026 The case is being listed today as 3 March 2026 was declared a Holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27 February 2026. CM APPL. 13927/2026 (for restoration)1. By this application, the petitioners seek restoration of WP(C) 2026.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the order dated 30 January 2026 is recalled. The WP(C) 11368/2006 is restored to its original number. W.P.(C) 11368/2006 Page 1 of 23. The application is allowed accordingly. W.P.(C) 11368/20064. At request of Mr. Pathak, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioners, re-notify the writ petit...
M/S Global Infratech vs Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11814/2025 M/S GLOBAL INFRATECH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranay Jain, Mr. Kunal Jha, Ms. Smridhi, AdvocatesversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.G. Gopalakrishnan, Mr. Girish Kaul, Ms. Aishwarya Singh Rana, Mr. Abhiram Venugopal, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.01.20261. The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 5th April,2024 whereby the registration in favour of the petitioner under the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) came to be cancelled. The petitioner was granted Registration under the CGST Act on 1st July, 2017.2. There appears to be failure on the part of the petitioner to file returns, which led to issuance of a Show Cause Notice dated 14th November, 2023.3. The petitioner accordingly was put to notice that having ...