Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sapna & Ors. vs Mangal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 794/2013 Date of decision: 30th January 2026 SAPNA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advocates.versusMANGAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Niyati Jadaun, Advocate for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENT% ANISH DAYAL, J. (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed seeking enhancement of compensationawarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) by award dated 02nd May 2013 (Impugned Award) in MACT No. 291/2011, whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 9,33,752/- to the claimants along with interest @ 9% per annum.2. The accident occurred on 25th March 2011 at about 01:05 P.M., whenthe deceased was travelling to Jahagir Puri on bicycle along with his wife. Subsequently, a truck driven by the respondent no.1, in rash and negligent manner and at high speed, came from behind, and hit the bicycle. As a result, they fell down and deceased came under the left front...
M/S Om Nanotech Pvt Ltd vs M/S Venus Computer Services
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + CM(M) 1158/2018 & CM APPL. 39097/2018 M/S OM NANOTECH PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advocate.versusM/S VENUS COMPUTER SERVICES .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Bhati, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 05th April, 2018, passed by the trial court in Civil Suit No. 93446/16, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 14, seeking permission to place certain documents on record, has been dismissed.3. Heard. Record perused.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner argued that the documents sought tobe placed on record are relevant for the proper adjudication of the case. These documents could not be filed earlier due to the negligen...
Ram Sunder Shukla and Ors vs Dda and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8801/2011 RAM SUNDER SHUKLA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: NoneversusDDA AND ORS .....Respondents through: Ms. Kritika Gupta, Ms. Vidushi Singhania, Adv for R1 Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Yashita Jain, Advs, for DUSIBCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) Issue an appropriate writ/orders/directions whereby quashing/withdrawing the demolition notice dt. 19.10.2011 of the Respondent No.1& 2 DDA;(b) issue an appropriate writ/orders/directions wherebyrestraining the Respondents not to demolish the jhuggies of the petitioners situated at Shaheed Bhagat Singh Camp, Paschimpuri, New Delhi without allotting them alternative plot/ land as per the earlier directions of this Hon'ble Court and policy of rehabilitation/ relocation of the Govt. of NCT of Delhi;(c) issue an appropriate writ/orders/direct...
Sandeep vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13003/2018 SANDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Chandrika Upadhyaya, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Naman Choula and Mr. Yamit Jetley, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.01.2026 CM APPL. 6591/2026 (Delay of 334 days)1. For the reasons disclosed in the application, the delay of 334 days in filing the restoration application is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 6590/2026 (Restoration)3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant.4. Since the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the counsel failed to appear, we deem it appropriate to restore the petition.5. The applications, accordingly, stand allowed. W.P.(C) 13003/20186. It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased a vehicle. He is entitled for the concessional rate of GST being...
Mala Devi vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 805/2018 MALA DEVI .....Appellant Through:versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Saurabh Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. Mr. Vidit Gupta and Mr. Trivesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no. 2 to 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 10.03.20261. This matter has been listed on an office note.2. Vide order dated 30.01.2026, the matter has been sent back to the Sessions Court and the appellant has been directed to appear before the Sessions Court on 17.02.2026.3. Hence, the date already fixed, i.e., 11.03.2026 shall stand cancelled. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J MARCH 10, 2026/kdThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:14:57...
United India Insurace Co Ltd vs Dhiraj Trahan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
`* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 09th January 2026 Pronounced on : 29th January 2026 Uploaded on : 29th January 2026+ MAC.APP. 13/2026 & CM APPL. 1041/2026 (stay) UNITED INDIA INSURACE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus DHIRAJ TRAHAN .....Respondent Through:+ MAC.APP. 14/2026 & CM APPL. 1044/2026 (stay) UNITED INDIA INSURACE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus GEETA TREHAN .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These appeals have been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act) by the Insurance Company challenging impugned award dated 08th October 2025 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal [hereinafter, Tribunal], North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi in MACT Case no. 449556/2016 titled as Dhiraj Trehan v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd & Anr and in MACT Case No.Signature Not Verified Digitally Si...
Deep Narayan Surya Kumar Smriti Mahavidyalaya (D.El.ED) vs National Co ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~112 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 696/2026 & CM APPL. 3426/2026 DEEP NARAYAN SURYA KUMAR SMRITI MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.EL.ED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr Brijendra Singh Advocate versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026CM APPL. 3427/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 696/20261. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- (a) quashing of withdrawal order dated 10.09.2025 issued by the respondentNo.2, withdrawing recognition of the D.El.Ed. courses of petitioner institution, in an arbitrary and illegal manner; and (b) direction to respondent no.2 to issue order of restoration, thereby restoring recognition of D.El.Ed. courses of the petitioner institution with all ...
Sonia Mahila Mahavidyalaya (D.El.ED) vs National Council for Teacher E ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 780/2026 & CM APPL. 3883/2026 SONIA MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.EL.ED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr Brijendra Singh AdvocateversusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- (a) quashing of withdrawal order dated 10.09.2025 issued by the respondentNo.2, withdrawing recognition of the D.El.Ed. courses of petitioner institution, in an arbitrary and illegal manner; and (b) direction to respondent no.2 to issue order of restoration, thereby restoring recognition of D.El.Ed. courses of the petitioner institution with all the benefits of being a recognised institute; and (c) consequent direction to respondent no.2 to update its website by displaying the ...
Sudama vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 216/2026 SUDAMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.P. Singh (DHCLSC) with Mr. Nitej Kumar & Mr. Poorna, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva & Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Advs. Mr. Anil Kumar, SI, P.S. Dabri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 18.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 8222/2026 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 8221/2026(corrections/modifications of orders) 1. The applicant, who has been granted parole, seeks modification in order dated 29.01.2026, simply for the reason that his family members have not been able to arrange surety. He, therefore, seeks his release on personal bond or cash surety. 2. However, before taking any final decision with respect to abovesaid aspect, learned Standing Counsel for respondent who appears on advance notice, is requested to place on r...
Abhishek vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 276/2026 ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shatrughan Singh, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP with ASI Ravinder Singh.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 29.01.20261. Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.0984/2025 dated 25.10.2025, for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/3(5) BNS 2023, (corresponding Sections 307/34 IPC) registered at P.S. Burari. 2. A cursory look at the averments appearing in the FIR would indicate that on the relevant date, the complainant-Ashok Yadav was beaten up by accused-Rohit along with the co-accused persons, namely Karan, Krishn @ Kallu and Prem. Accused-Rohit exhorted his associates saying that today he (Ashok) should not be spared and, thereafter, co-accused-Karan took out a knife and stabbed the complainant with the intention to kill him, and other co-accused i.e. Rohit, al...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »