Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pawan Kumar vs.nanhi Devi (Since Deceased) Now Represented by Gomti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Sanjay Batra vs.ved Prakash Makkar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 RC.REV. 590/2016 & CM APPL. 45493/2016 & 52639/2018 SANJAY BATRA VED PRAKASH MAKKAR & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: Ms.Richa Kapoor and Mr.Shivam Tyagi, Advs Mr.Sachin Mishra, Mr.Ayush Dua, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 22.10.2016, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop in property bearing No.5828- A measuring 4 feet 11 inches x 4 feet 3 inches, Ground Floor, Gali Matkewali, Sarai Hafiz Banna, Ward No.13, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, more part...
Sudesh Arora vs.jagdish Raj Sagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 C.R.P. 207/2019 SUDESH ARORA versus JAGDISH RAJ SAGAR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Anurag Ojha, Adv. For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 41386/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 207/2019 & CM APPL.41385/2019 & 41387/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 29.01.2019 whereby an application filed by the respondent under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) CPC seeking to place on record certain additional documents has been allowed with cost of Rs.5000/-.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the application respondent has substantially delayed the progress of the suit which was at the stage of final hearing and about one year passed in disposal of the CRP.207/2019 Page 1 of 2 application.3. By the application under Order 8 Rule ...
Pawan Kumar vs.ram Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Avm Oil Field Services vs.gail Gas Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :16. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 5952/2019 & CM APPL. 25748/2019 (Stay) AVM OIL FIELD SERVICES Through: Mr.Rajat Wadhwa & Mr.Devanshu Chauhan, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus GAIL GAS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Azmat H. Amanullah, Adv.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 08.03.2019 passed by the respondent banning the petitioner for a period of two years from the date of the order.2. By an Agreement dated 30.11.2016 executed between the parties, the petitioner had been awarded the work of Hiring Services for Forecourt Management (Dispenser Operation and Associated Jobs) at Meerut and including at Lohia Nagar.3. It is the case of the respondent that on 11.08.2018, it came to the knowledge of the respondent through a video which was circulated on social media, a customer was seen alleging the Company to have WP(C) No.5952...
M/S Harvik Brothers (India) vs.dinesh Monga
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 445/2019 Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 M/S HARVIK BROTHERS (INDIA) versus DINESH MONGA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Prateek Tanwar, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Atul Sahi, Mr. P.R. Singh and Ms. Ruchira Singh, Advs. with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 12.04.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from a shop in property bearing No.73, South Patel Nagar, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to ...
C B Jindal Aluminium Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
Delhi Development Authority vs.brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 + CM(M) 1054/2018 & CM APPL. 36434/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel versus (M-9810129577) BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Jagia, Mr. Amit Sood & Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Advocates (M- 9810043405) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 2nd May, 2018 by which the Respondents/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Plaintiff) application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been allowed by the ld. Trial Court and the amended plaint has been taken on record.2. The brief background is that the contractor i.e. the Plaintiff was awarded a construction contract by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter, DDA) for some outstanding work in the Commonwealth Games. Disputes arose between the parties as to whether the DDA would be liable to reimburse servi...
Sh. Brahmprakash Sharma vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :16. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9567/2018 & CM APPL. 37218/2018 SH. BRAHMPRAKASH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate alongwith petitioner in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC for UOI alongwith Mr.M.K. Bharti, Deputy Director, Pay & Accounts Department, GSI, ER, Kolkata. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition is directed against order dated 17.05.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal by which OA filed by the petitioner herein stands dismissed.2. The necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner applied for the Combined Graduate Level Examination, (CGLE), 2015 conducted by the Staff Selection Commission, New Delhi in the year 2015. The petitioner was called for an interview held o...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.vinod Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 634/2017 VINOD BANSAL NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Jindal, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj & Mr. Shubham Gairola, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 06.05.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) by which the OA filed by the respondent herein stands allowed.2. Before considering the submissions made by counsel for the parties, we deem it appropriate to note some necessary facts which gave rise to the filing of the OA. At the relevant time the respondent was working as a Junior Engineer (JE) in the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi. In W.P.(C) 634/2017 Page 1 of 9 October 2007, he was posted in the Building Department, City Zone, where he was placed in-charge of the Maliwara area w....