Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krish Automotors Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3736/2018 KRISH AUTOMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Aseem Mehrotra and Mr. M.K.Gandhi, Advocates versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi & Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Satyakam, Advocates for Customs. % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1609.2019 1. The... Petitioner, registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) has filed this petition inter-alia seeking a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to permit the... Petitioner to file the GST TRAN-I manually and allow the credit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 1,41,02,394/- claimed in accordance with Section 140 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017, in its online electronic credit ledger for payment of its output liability under the GST laws. W.P.(C) 3736/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. The... Petitioner ...
Central Warehousing Corporation Through: Its Regional Manager, Delhi R ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:16. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10165/2017 & CM Appl. 41513/2017 2 M/S SUMAN FORWARDING AGENCY PVT. LTD......... Petitioner Through: Mr.Harvinder Singh and Mr.Shiven Khurana, Advocates versus THE CHIEF PATRON/VICE PRESIDENT/GENERAL SECRETARY, CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION MAJDOOR UNION ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Asha Jain Madan and Mr.Mukesh Jain, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocate Mr.K.K. Tyagi Ahmad, Advocates for CWC Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate as Amicus Curiae and Mr.Iftekhar + W.P.(C) 10665/2017 & CM Appls. 43644/2017, 43645/2017 3 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION THROUGH: ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, DELHI REGION Through: Mr.K.K. Tyagi ........ Petitioner and Mr.Iftekhar Ahmad, Advocates CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION MAZDOOR UNION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Ms.Asha Jain Madan and Mr.Mukesh Jain, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Harvinder Singh and Mr.Shiven Khurana, Adv...
Pawan Kumar vs.chameli & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Anil Tyagi & Ors. Vs.the State of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h September, 2019 TEST. CAS. 54/2017 ANIL TYAGI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Represented by: Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, Advocate versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mhd. Umar Iqbal Khan and Mhd. Irshad, Advocates for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks grant of probate/Letters of Administration on the basis of the Will and testament dated 30th December 1988 with respect to the estate of Late Smt. Inderjeet Kaur in favour of the petitioners.2. As per the petition, the deceased, Late Smt. Indrjeet Kaur died on 11th December 2011. Late Smt. Inderjeet Kaur executed a will in favour of Lt. Smt. Urmila Tyagi in respect of agricultural land measuring 4 Bigha 11-Biswa being her half share in total land measuring 9 Bigha 3 Biswa falling in Khasra No.1748/1, 176and 176of revenue estate Village Chhatarpur, Tehsil- Mehrauli, Ne...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.pankaj Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 681/2018 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State. versus PANKAJ BANSAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anil Soni with Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Advocates with respondent in person. Date of Decision:16th September, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed by the State challenging the judgment and order dated 06th August, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-01/Special Judge at North, Rohini Courts, New Delhi, whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted in Session Case No.584registered with PS Adarsh Nagar in FIR No.401/2015, under Sections 363 as well as 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 POCSO Act. The relevant portion of the impugned judgment is reproduced hereinbelow:-"50. Moreover, the accused in his statement u/s 313 CrPC has denied that his blood samples wer...
Rajeev Kumar Bhardwaj vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 4543/2016 and CM APPL. 35206/2019 RAJEEV KUMAR BHARDWAJ Through: Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Mr. Varun Tandon, Advs. for R-1 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel (Services) with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laveena Arora, Advs. for R-2 Ms. Meenal Duggal, Adv. for Mr. Viraj R Datar, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition,... Petitioner prays for the following reliefs: b) A writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 03.02.2012 passed by the Ld. District & Sessions Judge, Delhi/ Respondent No.2, being illegal, arbitrary; without jurisdiction and unjust and in violation of the consolidated in O.M. dated 26.12.2013; instructions contained W.P.(C) 4543/2016 Page 1 of 15 c) A writ in the nature of certiorari, ...
S R Sales Communication & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
Star Office Supplier & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
Rihana Begam vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~46 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h September, 2019 LPA6012019 & CM APPLs. 41262/2019 & 41263/2019 RIHANA BEGAM ..... Appellant Through: Md. Azam Ansari, Adv. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Johri with Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advs. for DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) CM APPL. 41262/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. LPA6012019 & CM APPL. 41263/2019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose W.P.(C) No.8615/2019 is pending before the learned Single Judge and in the said writ petition following order has been passed: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief is claimed only against the respondent no.3. The other respondents are, therefore, deleted from the array of parties. The petitioner shall file an amended memo of parties within one week from today. Issue notic...
Chandan Kumar Majumdar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4629/2019 CHANDAN KUMAR MAJUMDAR Through: Mr. B.L. Yadav, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with SI Shashi Kant, PS Seemapuri, Delhi Mr. Vikas Dudeja and Mr. M.K. Saroja, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 35816/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4629/2019 2. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.198/2012 dated 07.06.2012, registered at PS Seema Pur, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act and all other proceedings emanating CRL.M.C. 4629/2019 Page 1 of 3 therefrom.3. Notice issued.4. Notice is accepted by the learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »