Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yogita & Ors vs.gajender Singh & Ors (National Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 199/2019 & CM APPL. 5532/2019 Decided on:17. 09.2019 YOGITA & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kr. Singh and Mr. Umakant Mishra, Advocates. Mr. A.S. Rana, Advocate for appellant No.3. versus GAJENDER SINGH & ORS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The award of compensation dated 10.07.2018 in MACT Nos. 1and 364/16, is impugned on the ground that the minimum wages of Rs. 14,000/- instead of Rs. Rs. 9,048/- should have been made applicable. The learned counsel for the appellant is however unable to show any notification in support of his contention. The Court has accessed the internet and found that the minimum wages applicable in Delhi with effect from 01.04.2015 for an unskilled worker was Rs. 9,048/-. The accident happened in August 2015. The minimum wages were revised from 01.10.2015. In the circu...
Prof (Dr.) J. Sundaresan Pillai vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :17. 09.2019 PROF (DR.) J.SUNDARESAN PILLAI Through : Ms. Romy Chacko, Advocate. ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 9495/2019 versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Jayesh K. Unnikrishnan, Advocate for R1,2 &3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 26.07.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).2. Some facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner started his career as a Scientist at CSIR- NISCAIR in the year 1992. The age of retirement for scientists in the Ministry of Agriculture was increased from 60 years to 62 years w.e.f. W.P.(C) 9495/2019 Page 1 of 5 13.10.2003 and the age of retirement for scientists in ICMR...
Ekta Arora vs.ajay Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 240/2019 & C.M.Applns.41403-06/2019 EKTA ARORA Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Santwana, ..... Appellant versus Ms. Saumya Johari, Advocates. AJAY ARORA Through: None. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ORDER1709.2019 By the impugned judgment dated 07.06.2019, the Family Court has % 1. dissolved the marriage of the appellant/wife with the respondent/husband.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant/wife and the respondent/husband had got married at Delhi on 06.09.1998 and were blessed with twins, a boy and a girl, on 15.06.1999. The respondent/husband approached the Family Court seeking a divorce on the grounds of cruelty by moving a petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) alleging inter alia that he could not continue with the marriage on account of the cruel treatment meted out to him by the appella...
Brijesh Kumar vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16.09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4633/2019 1. BRIJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahipal Singh , Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Anoop Rana, PS Bindapur and SI/IO Surendar Singh, PS Dwarka, Sec. 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.447/2016 registered at Police Station Binda Pur instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 354B/506 IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by the learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C. 4633/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objectio...
Pawan Kumar vs.shakuntal Devi (Since Deceased) Represented by Her Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Sant Lal vs.shiela Vanti & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 RC.REV. 153/2017 & CM APPL. 12412/2017 SANT LAL versus SHIELA VANTI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Ansari with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advs. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 15.11.2016, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop bearing private No.5, on Ground Floor, of Property No.810, Som Bazar, Haibutpura, Near Raghunath Mandir, Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043, RC.REV.153/2017 Page 1 of 3 more particularly a...
Airworth Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd. Vs.interglobe Technology Quotient P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~A-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 374/2019 AIRWORTH TRAVELS & TOURS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Nikul Singhvi, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus INTERGLOBE TECHNOLOGY QUOTIENT PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Mr. Kishore Kumar, Mr. Ashish Singla, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.12794/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. I.A. No.12796/2019 (permission to file lengthy list of dates) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 374/2019 3. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (Act), seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 374/2019 P...
Sanjay Gupta vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :16. 09.2019 ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4508/2018 SANJAY GUPTA $~6 * Through:... Petitioner-in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Standing Counsel with Mr. Dushyant Sarna & Mr. P. Harold, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, who appears in-person, is aggrieved by order dated 09.10.2017 by which the OA filed by the petitioner seeking special allowance on his having been posted at the headquarters, has been dismissed. The relevant portion of the impugned order reads as under: 4. ... I am also informed by the respondents counsel that there are large number of similarly placed officers, and that payment or otherwise of Headquarter Allowance has to be decided, keeping in view the financial implications as well. This being a policy matter, which is still under consideration of the respondents, I ref...
Gaurav Mavi vs.state (n.c.t. Of Delhi )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :06. 09.2019 Pronounced on :16. 09.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2231/2019 GAURAV MAVI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate Mr. Tushar Gupta, Mr. Akshat with Mr. Indresh Upadhyay, Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kr. Mishra, Advocates versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI ) .... Respondent Through Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Ved Parkash, SHO P.S.-Mehrauli and SI Satyender Gulia, PS- Mehrauli. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER BAIL APPLN. 2231/2019 & Crl.M(B) No.151. This is the second application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.349/2019 U/s 33/of Delhi Excise Act & of NDPS Act registered at Police Station- Mehrauli. BAIL APPLN. 2231/2019 Page 1 of 5 2. It is submitted by the Ld. counsel for the accused that there are no specific allegations in the FIR against the petitioner and he was not even present at the place of incident. He further submitted that the ...
Amit Infotech Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »