Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Mohit Garg & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4589/2019 SH. MOHIT GARG & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Adv. with Mr.D.K. Pandey & Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. SI Vishal Gupta, PS Vijay Vihar. Mr.Ankit Kalra, Adv. with Ms.Shivani Giri, Adv. for R-2 with R- 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.A.35694/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4589/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1146/2014 dated 06.10.2014, registered at PS Vijay Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4IPC and all CRL.M.C. 4589/2019 Page 1 of 3 other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and wit...
Focus Combine Marketing Pvt Ltd vs.haryana State Cooperative Supply & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~15, 16 & 17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO92019 and C.M. No.1042/2019 + FOCUS COMBINE MARKETING PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Gupta, Ms. Sunakshi Gupta and Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for R-1 with Ms. Usha Chopra, Asstt. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. S.B. Chauhan, Authorised Representative FAO102019 and C.M. Nos.1046/2019, 23794/2019, 35586/2019 SYSCOM CONSUMER PRODUCTS PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Gupta, Ms. Sunakshi Gupta and Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for R-1 with Ms. Usha Chopra, Asstt. FAO911/2019. Page 1 of 7 Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. S.B. Chauhan, ...
Ajay Sehgal & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 AJAY SEHGAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with ASI Chandar Pal Singh, PS Farsh Bazar, New Delhi ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 35696/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.49/2018 dated 16.02.2018, registered at Police Station - Farsh Bazar, New Delhi instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Notice.4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The petitioner no...
Surinder Singh Bhogal vs.vinod Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2019 CM(M) 1348/2019, CM APPL. 40776/2019 & CM APPL. 40777/2019 SURINDER SINGH BHOGAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Aggarwal and Mr. Sushant Sagar, Advocates. versus VINOD SHARMA & ANR Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This petition impugns the orders of the learned Tribunal dated 12.10.2018, 28.01.2019 and 22.07.2019 passed in Petition Nos. 678/2018 and 679/2018 on the ground that a road roller, which has been seized on the directions of the Court, is not covered under the definition of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act). The said contention is untenable because the definition of a light motor vehicle under section 2(21) of the Act includes a road roller; it reads as under:-"2(21). "light motor vehicle" means a transport vehicle or omnibus the gross vehicle weight of either of which or a motor car or tractor or road-roller the unladen weight of any of ...
Ajay Marwah vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 964/2019 with CRL.M.(BAIL) 1610/2019, CRL.M.A. 35694/2019 AJAY MARWAH Through: Mr. K. Kaushik, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State None for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner/ accused prays for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 04.09.2019 passed by the learned ASJ (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi, in C.A. No.56/19, titled as 'Ajay Marwah Versus B.D. Jain Trading Company' and further prays for setting aside the judgment dated 28.02.2019 and order on sentence dated 06.03.2019 passed in Complaint Case No.15367/2016 titled as 'M/S B.D. Jain Trading Company Versus Ajay Marwah' by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Rohini Courts, Delhi. CRL.REV.P. 964/2019 Page 1 of 7 2. The present petition is filed on the ground that the trial Court and t...
Lt. Col Amit Sharma vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2330/2019 and CRL.M.A. 33956/2019 LT. COL AMIT SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Lovkesh Sawhney, Mr Durgesh Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Kumar, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Through: Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, SPP for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1309.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that the FIR No.CBI: ACB: Imphal, RC02120180003, be quashed. The petitioner is a serving officer with the Indian Army. The 2. petitioner was posted at Dimapur and was commanding officer of 50 Coy (Company) ASC (Army Service Corps) (Supply). During his tenure, he had accepted illegal gratification from a local contractor (Sh. Jai Prakash proprietor of M/s Singh and Singh Cargo and The Carpenters, Dimapur, Nagaland). The said contractor was engaged in supplying edible oil and pulses to 50 Coy ASC (Supply). He had alleged that a sum of...
Pitam Singh & Anr vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO952015 PITAM SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advcoate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Deepak, eighteen years old son of the appellants, was statedly travelling by a railway train (described as Satyagrah Express train) having boarded it from Delhi Railway Station on 02.02.2011 to proceed to Gajraula Railway Station as a bonafide passenger. Sometime before Gajraula Railway Station, allegedly due to jerk in the movement of the train, he fell down (out of the train) and suffered injuries as a result of which he died. An accident claim case under Section 16 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 was presented by the parents (the appellants) on 27.06.2014 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, it being accompanied by an application under Section 17(2) FAO952015 Page 1 of 5 of the Railway Claims Tr...
State vs.vicky
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 143/2017 STATE Through: Ms Kusum Dhalla, APP for ........ Petitioner State. SI Ravi Saini, N. Cell, Crime Branch. Versus ..... Respondent Through VICKY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1309.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Crl. M.A. No.4197/2017 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the present petition is condoned. CRL.L.P. 143/2017 2. The State has filed the above captioned petition seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 21.07.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Judge, NDPS in Sessions Case No.180/2014, arising from FIR No.57/2014 registered with the Crime Branch alleging an offence under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter NDPS Act). By CRL.L.P. 143/2017 Page 1 of 9 the impugned judgment, the respondent was acquitted of the offence under Section 21 of the NDPS Act.3. It is the prosecutions cas...
Parvesh vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 09.2019 + LPA5912019 PARVESH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Mr.Suryadeep Singh, Mr. Karan Tarkar & Ms.Radha Tarkar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi & Mr. Sameer Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL.40807 /2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA5912019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose writ petition, being W.P.(C) 9312/2019, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 6th September, 2019 (Annexure P-1 to the memo of this LPA), whereby this appellant (original petitioner) was not allowed to rectify the form which was filled up by this appellant for the examination in question, especially when out of three examinations, two are already over and only the last one is...
Colonel Vijynath Jha vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d September, 2019 Decided on:12. h September, 2019 + WP(C) 7583/2018 COLONEL VIJYNATH JHA .....Petitioner Through:... Petitioner-in-person UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates along with Brig. V.K. Tiwari. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 Aggrieved by the denial of permanent secondment to the Directorate General of Quality Assurance (DGQA) by the impugned order dated 17th December 2007 issued by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the... Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. In response to the notice issued in the present petition on 4th September, 2018 the... RESPONDENTS i.e. the MoD (Respondent No.1), the Secretary, Department of Defence Production (DoDP) (Respondent No.2), Quality Assurance Selection Board (QASB) (Respondent No.3), the DGQA WP(C) 7583/201...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »