Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sar Pioneer Infrastructure Pvt Ltd &Anr. Vs.delhi Development Authorit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
Rohit Gupta and Anr. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h September, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 9478/2017 ROHIT GUPTA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil K. Mittal with Mr. Divgosh Arora and Mr. Harshit Vashisht, Advocates GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Chirayg Jain and Mr. Ishan Agarwal, Advocates. Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi with Ms. Sonali S.S, Advocates for respondent no.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners inter alia seeking the following prayers: thereby striking down a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction the Notifications No.30(405)/ Amendment of Rules-MAWPSC2007/ DD(SS)/DSW/ 2015-16/24836-865 dated 19.12.2016 as well as subsequent Notification No.30(405)/ Amendment of Rules-MAWPSC...
Sanjay vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: September 13, 2019 + W.P.(C) 2158/2019 SANJAY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC with ..... Respondent Ms. Swagata Bhuyan & Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may most graciously be pleased to: (a) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in favour of the... Petitioner quashing the order dated 21.02.2019 passed by the Respondent; (b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of declaration in favour of the petitioner and against the Respondent and thereby declare that the petitioner is not disqualified under 1(d) of the tender & W.P.(C) No.2158/2019 Page 1 of 8 OR / IN THE ALTERNATE Issue an appropriate W...
Ex. Hc/Gd Prahalad vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~1 to 7, 9 and 10 and 13 to 61 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8203/2019 EX. HC/GD PRAHALAD ....... Petitioner Through Mr. O.P.Agarwal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Advocate alongwith Mr.Paripoorv Singh, Advocates Mr.Anil Soni,CGSC with Mr.Devesh Dubey,Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 8264/2019 EX. HC/GD BHAWANI SINGH Through Mr. O.P.Agarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Advocate alongwith Mr.Paripoorv Singh, Advocates Mr.Anil Soni,CGSC with Mr.Devesh Dubey,Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 8283/2019 EX. HC/GD RAMBIR SINGH Through Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus + + W.P.(C) Nos. 8203/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 27 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through None ....... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 8297/2019 EX. HC/GD DINESH SINGH Through Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through None ........ RESPONDE...
St. Giri School Through Ms Laxmi Waila vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9510/2019 ST. GIRI SCHOOL THROUGH MS LAXMI WAILA........ Petitioner NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms.Urvashi Singh, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms.Kaadambari Puri, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent NDMC to provide an independent water connection to the petitioner School.2. Subject petition has been filed contending that there is a dispute between the school and the landlords. Learned counsel submits that the school has been running in the said premises for the last 40 years and now the members of the temple have started interfering in their use and occupation and disputing their rights in the property. W.P(C) 9510/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the water...
Sh. Tara Chand vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09.2019 $~39 * + W.P.(C) 9869/2019 SH. TARA CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T.D. Yadav, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Ms. Shreya Sinha, Adv. for UOI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 06.05.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal).2. In this case, the petitioner joined the services of the respondent as a peon on 27.09.1982. Just prior to his date of superannuation i.e. 30.04.2019, the petitioner made a representation on 12.03.2019 for issuance of necessary directions for rectification of date of birth in the service records. Rectification was declined ; the O.A. moved before the Tribunal was also rejected.3. At the outset, we are constrained to observe that this is yet another matter which needlessly adds to the burden of pending cases before ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.khem Karan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~24, 25 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 780/2019, CM APPL. 40843/2019, CM APPL. Decided on:13. 09.2019 40844/2019, CM APPL. 40845/2019 & CM APPL. 40846/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus KHEM KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 781/2019, CM APPL. 40855/2019, CM APPL. 40856/2019, CM APPL. 40857/2019 & CM APPL. 40858/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus BABY AVANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 784/2019, CM APPL. 40866/2019, CM APPL. 40867/2019, CM APPL. 40868/2019 & CM APPL. 40869/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant KHEM KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Nikhil Jain and Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. These appeals impugn the award of compensation on the ground that there was a doubt apropos the identity of the car. It is argued that when the injured motorcyclist-husband of the deceased had stated to the...
Dinesh Kumar vs.m/s Tread Stone Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9854/2019 & CM No.40708/2019 (for exemption) Date of Decision:-"13.09.2019 DINESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Akarsh Bhalla & Mr.Pankaj Arora, Advs. versus M/S TREAD STONE LTD. AND ANR. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assails the award dated 26.03.2018 passed by the learned Labour Court, South West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in LIR No.38(Old ID No:204/2015) whereunder the petitioners claim for reinstatement has been rejected.2. The petitioner, joined the respondent company in its Delhi office as a Checker on 02.08.2000. In 2009, the petitioner being desirous of seeking an alternate employment, requested the respondents to issue him an experience certificate, which was duly issued to him on 13.02.2009 but he continued to serve at the W.P.(C)No.9854/2019 Page 1 of 4 respond...
Mr. Noor Mohd. Vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~A-5 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 11693/2017 and CM Appl. 47445/2017 MR. NOOR MOHD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Neeraj Bhandari and Mr.Rajesh K. Sharma, Advs. EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mohd. Faisal, Adv. for EDMC. Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Shiva Pandey and Ms.Khushboo Nahar, Advs. for R-5/DUSIB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to remove themselves from shop/ plots No.93 and 94 measuring 50 square yards situated at Loha Market, Welcome, Seelampur Phase-III (Adjacent to Dust House), Opp. M-Block, Seelampur, Delhi. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. The case of the petitioner is that in 1976, respondent No.3/DDA when it was in control of Slum and JJ Department and rehabilitation came up with a rehabilitatio...
M/S Parkland Properties Ltd vs.new Rajput Cooperative Group Housing So ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d September, 2019 Pronounced on:13. h September, 2019 + CS(COMM) 205/2016 M/S PARKLAND PROPERTIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: None. versus NEW RAJPUT COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY ..... Defendant Through: Dr. Harish Uppal & Mr.Tileshwar Prasad, Advocates. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT I.A.12009/2019 (under Order XXXVII Rule 4 of the CPC for recalling the orders dated 16.04.2019 and 07.08.2019) in CS(COMM) 205/2016 1. This is an application filed by the defendant in the present suit under Order XXXVII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC].. The following reliefs are sought by way of this application:-"A. That in view of the above facts and circumstances at this stage it is only humbly prayed that Rs.20,00,000/- paid may be taken as payment made by the time as may deem to have been extended by the Honble Court and allow suit to proceed in special facts and circumstances; CS(COMM) 205/2016 Pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »