Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Wadhwa & Anr. Vs.suraj Prakash Pahwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2019 + RC.REV. 542/2019 SANJAY WADHWA & ANR versus SURAJ PRAKASH PAHWA ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Rambhakt Agrawal, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. R.K.Sahani, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 40914/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV. No.913/2019 In view of the appearance of the respondent, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 542/2019 & CM APPL.40915/2019 & 40916/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 11.03.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and eviction order passed. RC.REV.542/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity, under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from Shop bearing No.39 4...
Anant Verinder Singh (Deceased) Thr Lr vs.col. Inderjeet Singh (Deceas ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2019 C.R.P. 203/2019 & Crl. M.A. 40936-38/2019 ANANT VERINDER SINGH (DECEASED) THR LR ........ Petitioner versus COL. INDERJEET SINGH (DECEASED) THR LR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner:... Petitioner in person. For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 05.04.2019 whereby the objections filed by the petitioner objecting to the execution of the decree were dismissed.2.... Petitioner who appears in person challenges the execution on the ground that the Court which passed the decree did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the Suit. He submits that the Suit was valued at Rs. 55 lakhs and decree was passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi after the amendment of the pecuniary jurisdiction of the High Court which raised the same to Rs. 2 ...
Syscom Packaging Company vs.haryana State Cooperative Supply & Marketi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~15, 16 & 17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO92019 and C.M. No.1042/2019 + FOCUS COMBINE MARKETING PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Gupta, Ms. Sunakshi Gupta and Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for R-1 with Ms. Usha Chopra, Asstt. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. S.B. Chauhan, Authorised Representative FAO102019 and C.M. Nos.1046/2019, 23794/2019, 35586/2019 SYSCOM CONSUMER PRODUCTS PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Gupta, Ms. Sunakshi Gupta and Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for R-1 with Ms. Usha Chopra, Asstt. FAO911/2019. Page 1 of 7 Mr. Bharat Bhushan Gupta, Adv. for R-2 with Mr. S.B. Chauhan, ...
Ratan Food Products vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~60 * + W.P.(C) 9940/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 09/2019 RATAN FOOD PRODUCTS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Ninad Laud & Mr.Jitender Mehta, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr.Preet Singh, Mr.Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates. Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Standing Counsel for IRCTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks issuance of writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction for declaring open E-tender No.2019/IRCTC/Catering/Tejas trains dated 14.09.2019 issued by the IRCTC as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, null and void-ab-initio and hence liable to be quashed.2. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition at the admission stage itself are ...
M/S Contentra Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.nikhil Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"13.09.2019 + W.P.(C) 9882/2019 & CM Nos.40834/2019 (for stay), 40835/2019 (for exemption) M/S CONTENTRA TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. NIKHIL PAL Through: Mr.Hem C. Vashisht, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 23.05.2019 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 rejecting the petitioners appeal against the order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the Controlling Authority.2. The respondent, who had worked with the petitioner organisation as a Junior Project Executive from 01.12.2008 to 21.02.2015, approached the Controlling Authority with a claim petition dated 27.08.2015 praying for a direction to the petitioner to release his gratuity. As per the claim petition, the respondents last W.P.(C)No.9882/2019 Page 1 of 6 d...
Dilip Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
ORDER1309.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 75 + W.P.(C) 3995/2019 & CMs 18101/2019 and 38995/2019 DILIP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Nanda Devi Deka with Mr Sudhir Yadav, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Through: Ms Bharathi Raju, CGSC for UOI. % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Aggrieved by an order dated 17th January, 2019, passed by the Air Headquarters, declining his request for issuance of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) and discharge, the... Petitioner, who is a Sergeant in the Indian Air Force (IAF), has filed this petition.2. The facts relevant to the present petition are that the... Petitioner joined the IAF on 28th June, 2005 as Airman and is at present, serving as a Sergeant. In 2014, an advertisement was issued by the Bihar State Public Service Commission (BPSC) for filling up Administrative Police and Finance Posts. By a letter dated 15th October, 2014, the... Petitioner sou...
Raghu Menon vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPL. 2226/2019 Judgment reserved on :12. 09.2019 Date of decision :13. 09.2019 RAGHU MENON Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Akshay Singh, Ms. Tasha Singh, Mr. Madhar Sharma, Mr. Lakshay Verma & Mr. Farhat Arif, Advs. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for GNCTD with Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State. SI Vikas Kumar, PS Dwarka South. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present bail application under Section 438 r/w Section 482 of the Cr.PC, 1973, the applicant/ petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.354/2019, PS Dwarka which is indicated to have been registered on 29.07.2019 on the complaint of Mr. Vikas Arora, s/o Mr. Amarjeet Arora, President of M/s Europa Digital Ltd. situated at A-57, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi for alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections BAIL APPL. 2226/2019 Page 1 of 25 420/406/467/471 r/...
The State of West Bengal vs.abijeet Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 09.2019 $~36 * + W.P.(C) 9793/2019 & CM APPL. No.40411/2019 THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Chatterjee Ms.Abhinandini Yadav, Advs. Raja & versus ABIJEET SINGH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal & Mr. Jayant Mohan, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 06.05.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal).2. Respondent No.1, an IPS officer, was allotted the West Bengal cadre. Respondent No.1 married an officer of the Indian Forest Service who was allotted the Rajasthan Cadre.3. Subsequently, respondent No.1 approached the Central Government to change his cadre from West Bengal to Rajasthan. An application was made on 27.05.2014. The Governments of Rajasthan and West Bengal gave no-objection to the request made by respondent No.1.4. A ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.baby Avani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~24, 25 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 780/2019, CM APPL. 40843/2019, CM APPL. Decided on:13. 09.2019 40844/2019, CM APPL. 40845/2019 & CM APPL. 40846/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus KHEM KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 781/2019, CM APPL. 40855/2019, CM APPL. 40856/2019, CM APPL. 40857/2019 & CM APPL. 40858/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus BABY AVANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 784/2019, CM APPL. 40866/2019, CM APPL. 40867/2019, CM APPL. 40868/2019 & CM APPL. 40869/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant KHEM KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Nikhil Jain and Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. These appeals impugn the award of compensation on the ground that there was a doubt apropos the identity of the car. It is argued that when the injured motorcyclist-husband of the deceased had stated to the...
Mulayam Singh Yadav Medical College and Hospital & Anr vs.union of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 09.2019 + LPA5942019 MULAYAM SINGH YADAV MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Mr. Abhay Kumar Tayal, Mr. Nishant Prateek & Mr. Akash Gupta, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 Mr.T.Singhdev, Adv. for R-2 & R-3 ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) : C.Ms.No.41011/2019 & 41013/2019 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA No.594/2019 1. These appellants are the original petitioners whose writ petition being W.P.(C) 7159/2019 was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 29th August, 2019 (Annexure P-1 to the memo of this LPA) and hence the original petitioners have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.2. Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the appellants are seeking renewal of permi...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »