Delhi Court September 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pawan Kumar vs.sushila & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Ashok Kumar vs.shiela Vanti & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 RC.REV. 156/2017 & CM APPL. 12745/2017 ASHOK KUMAR versus SHIELA VANTI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Ansari with Mr. I. Ahmed, Advs. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 15.11.2016, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from shop bearing private No.6, on Ground Floor, of Property No 810, Som Bazar, Haibutpura, Near Raghunath Mandir, Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043, RC.REV.156/2017 Page 1 of 3 more particularl...
Krishnagiri Wallajahpet Tollway Ltd. Vs.national Highways Authority of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~A-4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + ARB.P. 520/2019 KRISHNAGIRI WALLAJAHPET TOLLWAY LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Shweta Bharti, Advocate versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Aanchal Seth, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) (b) & (c) of the 1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of the Presiding Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes between the parties.2. The petitioner and the respondent entered into a concession agreement dated 13.05.2010 for execution of a project and during the concession period, the petitioner was obliged to construct, operate and maintain the project highway. Article 44 for the agreement provided for Dispute Resolution.3. By a subsequent Supplementary Agreement dated 08.02.2017, clause 44.3 of Article 44 of the agreement was amended, in terms of which any dispute be...
Shilpa Aggarwal vs.ruchika Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 CRL.REV.P. 378/2019 & CRL.M.A. 6786/2019 SHILPA AGGARWAL Through: Ms. Tulika Prasad, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Adv. RUCHIKA GUPTA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the order dated 14.1.2019 passed by ASJ-5 South East District, Saket Court, New Delhi, in criminal appeal 204183/2016.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner got married on 30.06.2006 and left House No.538, Sector-37, Faridabad for her matrimonial home and the petitioner till date is happily residing in her matrimonial home and is settled in United States of America.3. On 16.01.2005, the respondent Ms. Ruchika Gupta married with Mr.Nitin Gupta, who is real brother of the petitioner and the respondent is real sister in law of the petitioner. The marriage was solemnised on 16.1.200...
Chandra Prabhu Buldtech Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs.delhi Development Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12179/2018 S R SALES COMMUNICATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12180/2018 P S SPIRITS PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12226/2018 AMIT INFOTECH PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12227/2018 CHANDRA PRABHU BULDTECH PVT LTD & ANR..... Petitioners versus + + + + + W.P.(C)Nos.12166/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + + + + + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12228/2018 SAR PIONEER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD &ANR.Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 12229/2018 GPS GARMENTS &...
In the Matter of Bloom Management Services Private Limited Vs....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~C-52 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + CO.PET. 17/2019 IN THE MATTER OF BLOOM MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate for Official Liquidator ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497 (6) read with Section 497 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956 and Rule 323 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by the Official Liquidator for voluntary winding of Bloom Management Services Private Limited.2. The company has passed a Special Resolution in its Extraordinary General Meeting held on 18.05.2011 for voluntary winding up of the company. Mr. Sachin Vasudeva was appointed as a Voluntary Liquidator of the company.3. The Registrar of Companies was informed regarding the voluntary winding up and the appointment of the Voluntary Liquidator. Notices under Rule 315 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 were issued and filed Form No.152 & 149 for declar...
Ashif Khan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4660/2019 & CRL.M.A. 35893/2019 ASHIF KHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumr, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Vikas Dalal Mr. Randhir Kumar, Adv. for R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 35892/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4660/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.2dated 20.04.2015, registered at PS Khyala Distt. the offences punishable under Sections 354/354-B/506 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 4660/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the groun...
Pawan Kumar vs.satnam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~4 & 32 to 39 * + 32 + 33 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 CM(M) 425/2017 & CM APPLs. 14661/2017, 34790/2018, 34791/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates (M-9891043078) versus DESH RAJ (NOW DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates (M- 9818094931) for R-2 & 3 WITH CM(M) 212/2017 & CM APPLs. 6991/2017, 34782/2018, 34783/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SATNAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta & Mr. Ayush Saxena, Advocates WITH CM(M) 396/2017 & CM APPL. 13903/2017 PAWAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jain & Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocates versus SHAKUNTAL DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) REPRESENTED BY HER LRS ..... Respondent CM(M) 425/17, 212/17, 396/17, 398/17, 399/17, 401/17, 402/17, 406/17, 4Page 1 of 8...
Vinod Madan Lal Nawandhar vs.vidisha Garg & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + C.R.P. 18/2019 Judgment delivered on:16. 09.2019 VINOD MADAN LAL NAWANDHAR ........ Petitioner versus VIDISHA GARG & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Varun Goswami with Mr. Sahil Agarwal, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. S. S. Dahiya, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) C.R.P. 18/2019 & CM APPL.3398/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 26.09.2018, whereby, an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, filed by the petitioner, has been dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Suit filed by the respondent was barred on the principles of issue estoppel, res judicata order II Rule 2 CPC and also limitation.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent had earlier filed a Suit in the year 1993 seeking a declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction with regard to the same shares w...
Dsc Limited vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~A-34 * % + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 71/2019 and I.A. Nos. 11518/2019 and Date of decision:16. 09.2019 11519/2019 DSC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tejasv Anand and Ms. Nishtha Wadhwa, Advoates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Satish Kumar, E.E. in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 14 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking an order terminating the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator, Shri R.P. Tripathi.2.... Petitioner and respondent had entered into a contract on 24.03.2011 for construction of dwelling units including allied services for officers, JCOs etc. of the Indian Army. Disputes having arisen between the parties, the Arbitration Clause in the contract was invoked for appointment of the Sole Arbitrator. The Engineer-in-Chief of the respondent appointed Shri S.K. Gupta, a serving officer of the res...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »