Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jasvinder Singh vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14.02.2019 CRL.M.C. 3754/2018 JASVINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner Mr. Manmohan, Adv. For the Respondent(s): Mr. Manjeet Arya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Raghuveer CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28881/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3754/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.172/2013 under Sections 452/342/323/506/509 of the IPC at Police Station Bindapur, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. It is contended that the complainant is the sister-in-law of the petitioner. CRL.M.C. 3754/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the petitioner had forcefully entered into the room of the complainant, abused her and assaulted her with a hockey stick on accoun...
Chaman Singh vs.dev Prakash Goel & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:14. 02.2019 CM(M)1536/2010 CHAMAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through Mr.R.N.Dubey, Adv. Versus DEV PRAKASH GOEL & ANR. Through ....Respondents Respondent No.2-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to impugn the order dated 18.01.2010 by which the suit filed by the petitioner under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for possession of the suit property was dismissed.2. The petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, damages and permanent injunction for the suit property being 100 sq. yards of land, Plot No.20-21 in Khasra No.39-8/2, 39/7-4 of the Revenue Part, 25 Foota Road in the abadi of Rama Garden, Karawal Nagar, Delhi-110094. The petitioner/plaintiff claims title to the suit property by a long chain of transactions. It is pleaded that the property originally ...
Jonathan David Iverson Through His Authorised Representative Margaret ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6718/2018 & CM APPL. 25485/2018 JONATHAN DAVID IVERSON THROUGH HIS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MARGARET ANNETTE IVERSON ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sulabh Rewari, Ms Neha Mathen, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr Upender Sai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1402.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is a citizen of United States of America and has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the action of respondents in denying the petitioner re-entry into India, despite the petitioner holding a valid visa. The petitioner is married to an American citizen and has five daughters aged between three to eleven years, three of whom were born in India.2. At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the visa issued to the petitioner has expired and, therefore, the scope of the present petition is limited to th...
Rajesh Aggarwal vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2270/2017 & CRL.M.A. 9268/2017 RAJESH AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh K.Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavit Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur and Mr. Pulkit Jain, Advocates versus Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special .....Respondent C B I Public Prosecutor with Ms. Kriti Handa and Mr. Philomon Kani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 1st March, 2017 declines petitioners application under Section 91 of Cr. P.C. vide which petitioner had sought the details of the calls made by him from his mobile phone to various persons during the period from 3rd August, 2013 to 8th August, 2013.... Petitioner had also sought copy of letter of 6th August, 2013, vide which permission was granted for recording telephonic conversation of petitioners mobile phone for a period not exceeding 60 days from 3rd August, 2013. Trial court vide impugned order of 1st March, 2017, declines petitioners ...
Atul Gupta vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h February, 2019 ATUL GUPTA TEST.CAS. 64/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Premtosh Mishra with Mr. Mayank Tripathi & Ms. Gaurangi Gupta, Advs. Versus STATE Through: Mr. D.N.Goburdhun & Mr. Sriansh Prakash, ..... Respondent Advs. for applicants in IA No.14432/2018 Mr. Milind Srivastava, Adv. for R-9 & 10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14432/2018(u/O.I R.10 CPC) 1. Ms. Anju Chandna, Ms. Ritu Menon and Ms. Rina Sharma seek impleadment at the stage of recording of evidence, in this petition seeking probate, filed by the executor named in the document claimed to be the validly executed last Will of deceased Dr. Vimla Lal.2. On enquiry, it is informed that objections to the grant of probate have been filed by the sisters of the husband of the deceased, claiming that the husband of the deceased had predeceased the deceased and the deceased had no issues and the applicants who are the sisters of the h...
S vs.r K
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 232/2018, CM APPL3816768/2018 (Stay) Date of Judgment:14. h February, 2019 S CORAM: R K ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahesh Verma, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advocate. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 13.08.2018 by which a petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion has been allowed.2. The necessary facts required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnised on 21.04.2007 at Delhi as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Out of this wedlock, one son was born on 29.05.2008, who is under the care and custody of the appellant/mother. The parties a...
Ravi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 346/2019 Judgment delivered on:14. 02.2019 RAVI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI Raghuveer, P.S.Bindapur. Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.FIR No.315/12, under Sections 392/395/397/412/506/120-B IPC, P.S.Bindapur on the ground of marriage of his brother.2. As per the petitioner, the marriage functions commence from 20.02.2019 and go on till the evening of 25.02.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has twice earlier been released on interim bail and had duly complied with the order. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody for nearly seven years and only 9 out of 31 prosecution witnesses have been examined till date. It is prayed that pet...
Navin Soi vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
18 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 12/2013 NAVIN SOI Through Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Advocate ........ Petitioner with Mr. S.Krishna Murthy, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for ......... RESPONDENTS respondent No.2. Date of Decision:14. h February, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for grant of probate of Will dated 11th March, 2010, executed by late Mrs. Pushpa Kumari Soi.2. In the petition it has been averred that the petitioner is the executor of Will dated 11th March, 2010 and son of the testatrix, late Mrs. Pushpa Kumari Soi, who expired on 24th May, 2012 in New Delhi. The testatrix is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 11th March, 2010, which was duly attested by Mr. Anil Sapru and Mr. TEST.CAS.12/2013 Page 1 of 8 Ashok Kumar. The Will dated 11th March, 2010 executed by the testatrix is rep...
Phool Singh Yadav vs.delhi Developmnet Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
$~R.P.-1 & 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA1212018 CHANCHAL DEVI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Joshi & Mr. R.K.Sonkiya, Advs. * + DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: None. Versus + RSA1222018 PHOOL SINGH YADAV AND ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Joshi & Mr. R.K.Sonkiya, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMNET AUTHORITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1402.2019 Through: None. ..... Respondent R.P.No.442/2018 & CM No.52030/2018(for condonation of delay of 44 days in applying thereof) in RSA1212018 & R.P.No.427/2018 & CM No.50155/2018(for condonation of delay of 44 days in applying thereof) in RSA1222018 Review, along with condonation of delay of 44 days in applying 1. therefor, is sought of the common judgment dated 28th August, 2018 dismissing in limine the second appeals preferred by each of the review applicants, holding the same to be not raising any substantial question of law. RSA1212018 & RSA1222018 Page 1 of 3 2. Counsel for the ...
Karan Malhotra & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 841/2019 and CRL.M.As. 3377-3378/2019 KARAN MALHOTRA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public for State with SI Prosecutor Rajender Singh Mr. Sahil Munjal, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.179/2017, under Sections 498A/406/354/3of IPC registered at police station Malviya Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of second respondents affidavit of 11th February, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rajender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »