Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 36 of about 750 results (0.017 seconds)Union of India vs.rama Construction Co.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP1752015 UNION OF INDIA Date of Decision :15. h February, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul and Ms.Arti Bansal,Advs. versus RAMA CONSTRUCTION CO. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Avinash Trivedi and Ms.Ritika Trivedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 17.10.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the award of work of upgradation, renovation and new construction for CWG Games 2010 in JLN Stadium sports complex, New Delhi (SH: C/o Sub Station building I, III, IV and underground water tanks and pump rooms under OMP1752015 Page 1 Agreement No:03. EE/CWG D- VII/2008-09) by the petitioner to the respondent.2. The stipulated date of start of ...
Tag this Judgment!sh.suresh Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 857/2019 SH. SURESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Padam Jain and Mr. Vinay Kumar Bhasin, Advoctes. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Kartar Singh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 3435/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 857/2019 Quashing of FIR No.381/2013, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Binda Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 8th July, 2017 reached between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, SI Kartar Singh by on the basis of identity proof produced by he...
Tag this Judgment!Darshan Chadha Prop. Of M/S Chadha Sports (Regd.) vs.govt. Of Nct of D ...
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: February 15, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1296/2019, C.M. Appl. No.5874-5875/2019 DARSHAN CHADHA PROP. OF M/S CHADHA SPORTS (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahendra Singh, Mr. Karmvir Singh, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) ORDER1502.2019 1. Relying upon the order made by this court on 23.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No.737/2019, which had stayed the effect of the order made by Sports Authority of India (through Letter dated 27.08.2018) debarring it on account of failure to rectify the defects in connection with another contract, the petitioner contends that its bid for laying of synthetic hockey surface with other miscellaneous works for development of Sports facilities at Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Jhilmil...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesh vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 317/2019 SATISH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 318/2019 GANESH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Gaurav Seth, Mr.Mohit Bhardwaj, Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Mr.Vipin Malik, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Anirudh, P.S.Kalyanpuri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.51/2019 under Sections 308/3of the IPC, Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi.2. Status report has been filed in Bail APPLN.317/2019. Same is BAIL APPLN. 317 & 318/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken on record.3. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was attending the marriage of his nephew which was being held in a park and at about 8.30 PM they observ...
Tag this Judgment!Harbhajan Singh @ Bhajji vs.mahavir Singh
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h February, 2019 + RC.REV. 172/2018, CAV No.373/2018, CM APPL.6811/2018 HARBHAJAN SINGH @ BHAJJI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.T.C.Sharma, Advocate versus MAHAVIR SINGH ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Praveen Suri and Mr.Lakshay Dilavari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 15.02.2018 passed by the learned ARC (West), Tis Hazari Courts in Eviction Petition E-25587/2016. This petition was filed by the respondent on following grounds: i) The petitioner is owner/landlord of the premises i.e: WZ-451, at Gali Keli Wali, Nangal Raya. New Delhi and is residing on the ground floor and first floor of this property as he has inherited from his forefathers Late Shri Budh Singh. ii) The petitioner had been retired as Boiler Operator in S.B.M. Mills in 1995 and his family consists of his wife and two married sons namely S...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidhyut Utpada ...
Court: Delhi
$~23 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 78/2019 (24) ARB.P. 79/2019 (25) ARB.P. 80/2019 (26) ARB.P. 81/2019 (27) ARB.P. 82/2019 Date of Decision :15. h February, 2019 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kartik Nayar, Mr.Rishab Kumar, Mr.Sarthak Malhotra, Advs. versus UTTAR PRADESH RAJYA VIDHYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Pradeep Misra, Mr.Daleep Dhyani, Mr.Suraj Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the following Letter(s) of Award:-"Arb. P. No.78/2019 26.03.2008 Arb.P. No.79/2019 26.03.2008 Arb.P. No.80/2019 09.08.2007 - - - Letter of Award dated Letter of Award dated Letter of Award dated Arb.P.Nos.78-79-80-81-82/2019 Page 1 Arb.P. No.81/2019 09.08.2007 Arb.P. No.82/2019 09.08.2007 - - Letter of Award da...
Tag this Judgment!Madhu@ Mamta vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 15, 2019 CRL.A. 410/2013 MADHU @ MAMTA Through: Nemo. STATE Versus .....Appellant .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Naresh Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide impugned judgment of 24th November, 2012 appellant has been convicted under Sections 368 and 506 of IPC and for the offences punishable under Sections 5 and 6 of Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956 and vide order of 29th November, 2012 appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of 3,000/- with default clause for the offence under Section 5 of the aforesaid Act and to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of 3,000/- with default clause for the offence under Section 6 of the aforesaid Act. In addition, appellant has also been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of 3,000/- with default clause for the offence unde...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bgr Mining & Infra Ltd vs.ntpc Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: February 06, 2019 Judgment delivered on: February 15, 2019 + LPA812019, CM Nos. 5410-5411/2019 M/S BGR MINING & INFRA LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Priya Kumar, Mr. Adhish Srivastava and Mr. Tejas Chhabra, Advs. versus NTPC LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Ms. Shaheen and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advs. for NTPC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J CM No.5410/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exemption. Application stands disposed of. CM No.5411/2019 (permission to file lengthy synopsis) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of. LPA812019 1. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by M/S BGR Mining & Infra Ltd the challenging the judgment dated January LPA812019 Page 1 of 2 21, 2019 passed by the learned Sin...
Tag this Judgment!Judge Chawla vs.vinay Chhabra & Others
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h February, 2019. CS(OS) 520/2016, IA No.12602/2016(u/O.XXXIX R-1 & 2 CPC) & IA No.7804/2017(u/S151CPC) JUDGE CHAWLA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shrey Chathly with Ms. Bandana Grover & Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa, Advs. versus VINAY CHHABRA & OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 12th February, 2019, when this suit came up before this Court, the Through: Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Adv. for D-1. ..... Defendants following order was passed:-"1. The suit is ripe for framing of issues.2. Only the defendant no.1 is contesting the suit. The defendants no.2 to 4 have neither filed any written statement nor have appeared and have already been proceeded against ex parte.3. The counsel for the plaintiff has handed over proposed issues as under:-"(i) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to be granted the relief of possession of the suit property on the Sale Deed dated 21st June, 2007?. OPP (ii) Whether the Sale Deed dated 14th Jul...
Tag this Judgment!Seth Sita Ram vs.sarita Aggarwal & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:22. d January, 2019 Pronounced on:15. h February, 2019 + RC.REV. 14/2019 & CM APPL No.1003/2019 SETH SITA RAM ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Anil Agarwalla and Mr.Varun Kapoor, Advocates. versus SARITA AGGARWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS and Through : Ms.Shalini Kapoor Mr.Dikshant Khanna, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision petition is against the impugned order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the learned Pilot Court, CCJ cum ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition No.888/2017. The eviction petition was filed by the respondent herein against the petitioner in respect of first and second floor of premises No.394 out of Property No.392-395, Hauz Qazi, Delhi-110006. The basis of filing the petition is stated in para 18 of the eviction petition as under: 18(a)(i) BONAFIDE PERSONAL NECESSITY That the petitioners are the owners/landlords of suit property bearing No.3...
Tag this Judgment!