Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Baidyanath Shukla College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 2268/2018 & C.M. No.9409/2018 BAIDYANATH SHUKLA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. Through Mr.Sanjay Sherawat, Adv. ..Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER2004.2018 Vide the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 27th February, 2018, passed by respondent no.1 as also the order dated 4th April, 2017, passed by respondent no.2.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at length, this Court had on 6th April, 2018, passed the following order:-"the Vide petition, impugns present the the order dated 27th petitioner February, 2018, passed by respondent no.1 as also the order dated 4th April, 2017, passed by respondent no.2, whereby the petitioners application for grant of recognition, has been WP(C) No.2268/2018 Page 1 of 6 rejected on the ground that when the visiti...
Ishu Agarwal vs.national Textile Corporation Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order: April 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 3895/2018 1. ISHU AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rani Chhabra, Advocate versus NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo ORDER (ORAL) On the charge of unauthorized absence from duty, petitioner, who was posted as Assistant Manager (Marketing) in respondent-Corporation in Delhi, was departmentally tried and since petitioner did not participate in the Inquiry, therefore, on the basis of ex parte inquiry, the Disciplinary Authority has inflicted the penalty of removal from service on 17th November, 2015.... Petitioners removal was to relate back to the date of unauthorized absence from duty i.e. 25th June, 2013. Against penalty order of 17th November, 2015 (Annexure P-18), petitioner had preferred statutory appeal (Annexure P-23), which stands dismissed vide impugned order of 26th August, 2016 (Annexure P-26).2. To explain the...
In the Matter of Spreading Happiness Foundation (In vol.liqn.) Vs..... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~CP-44 * % + Date of decision:20. 04.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. 10/2018 IN THE MATTER OF SPREADING HAPPINESS FOUNDATION ......... Petitioner (IN VOL.LIQN.) Sindhwani, Through Ms.Ruchi Sr.Standing Counsel with Ms.Megha Bharara, Adv. for OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of Spreading Happiness Foundation (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act with the name Spreading Happiness Foundation with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi on 18.09.2013 having Corporate Identity Number U7414DL2013NPL258047 with Authorized capital of Rs.1,00, 00,000 (Rupees One Crores) divided into 10, 00,000 (Ten Lakh) equity share of Rs.10/- (Rupees Ten) each.3. The registered office of the ...
Director of Income Tax, New Delhi vs.arjun Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h December, 2017 Date of decision:20. h April, 2018 + INCOME TAX APPEAL Nos. 405/2005 & 406/2005 ARJUN MALHOTRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ved Jain &Mr.Pranjal Srivastava, versus Advocates. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue INCOME TAX APPEAL No.389/2007 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI .... Appellant Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue versus ARJUN MALHOTRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain &Mr.Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.: ITA Nos.405/2005 and 406/2005 have been filed by an individual, Arjun Malhotra impugning common order dated 29th January, 2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) deciding ITA Nos.1433/Del/2002 and 1434/Del/2002 relating to ITA Nos. 405/2005, 406/2005 & 38...
Mahabir Singh vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 20, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3940/2018, CM Nos. 15583-84/2018 MAHABIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Achal Gupta and Ms Annie Rais, Advs versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Parvinder Chauhan and Mr Nitin Jain, Advs for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner was Lower Divisional Clerk with 1. respondent-Board and he was departmentally tried in September, 2013 on the charge of malafidely putting up the proposal to allot Flat No.C-9-Z and C-15-Z, Jahangir Puri, Delhi in favour of Manjeet Singh and Sarabjeet Singh, although these flats were required to be sealed as per order of 11.07.2008 of Additional Commissioner. The case put up against the petitioner was that Manjeet Singh W.P.(C) 3940/2018 Page 1 of 4 and SarabjIt Singh were not riot victims but were subsequent tress passer and allotment proposed to be made to them was in violation of the res...
Surinder Kumar Puri vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:20thApril, 2018 * + W.P.(C) 2078/2016 SURINDER KUMAR PURI ....Petitioner Through: Mr. N. S. Chechi, Advocate. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Astha Tyagi with Mr. Dinesh Chander, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Ajinkya Tiwari Advocate for Mr. Karktik Jindal, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI,J (Oral) Pleadings are complete. The Writ Petition is set down for final 1. hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect to his 1/3rd share i.e. 1 bigha 1 biswa out of total measuring 3 bighas 3 biswas comprised in Khasra No.1255/4, situated in the revenue estate of village Malikpur, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation ...
M/S Virgotra Promotors & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.kamal Pahwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.329/2018 % M/S VIRGOTRA PROMOTORS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. 20th April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate. versus KAMAL PAHWA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms. Rohini, Advocate and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.15406/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.15405/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in this application, delay of 7 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. RFA No.329/2018 Page 1 of 10 C.M. stands disposed of. RFA3292018 3. This RFA under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant/counter-claimant impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.10.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit file...
Kishan Vishwakarma & Two Others vs.m/s Gulshan Engineering Works Throu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h April, 2018 Date of Decision:20. h April, 2018 W.P.(C) No.605/2012 KISHAN VISHWAKARMA & TWO OTHERS .....Petitioners Through Mr. Raj Kumar Maan, Advocate versus M/S GULSHAN ENGINEERING WORKS THROUGH ITS PARTNERS SMT.MEHARUNISHA AND VILAL HAJI .....Respondent Through Respondent ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to set aside or modify the Award dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court XVI, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (in short, called the Labour Court) in ID No.718/06/03. The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi through its Secretary (Labour), vide reference No.F-24(4705)/2002/Lab./ 798-802 dated 31.03.2003 referred the dispute between the Management of the respondent and its workmen, to the Labour Court for adjudication, in the foll...
Vikas & Ors vs.employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 3453/2018 & CMs13615-16/2018 VIKAS & ORS Through: Mr. Ankit Panwar, Advocate .....Petitioners versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ANR ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo ORDER (ORAL) In the first round of litigation, petitioners No.2 to 6 & 17 had approached this Court for rendering compulsory service in terms of Bond executed by them. This Court vide order of 23rd March, 2018 (Annexure P-3) had directed respondents to consider the case of petitioners No.2 to 6 & 17 for permitting them to render compulsory service under the Service Bond.2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that when the order of 23rd March, 2018 (Annexure P-3) was passed, it was not known to said petitioners that their bonds have been discharged. In this petition, dental graduates of first batch and second batch are aggrieved by Communication of 4th January, 2016 and 17th November, 2016 ...
Airports Authority of India vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th April, 2018 + CM(M) 1219/2013 and CM No.17844/2013 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was the second defendant in the civil suit (suit No.74/2007) which was instituted by the third respondent on 17.02.2007 seeking reliefs in the nature of declaration and injunction - mandatory and prohibitory. The first respondent was impleaded as the third defendant while the fourth respondent was shown in the array as the fourth defendant. The dispute between the said plaintiff and the fourth respondent (fourth defendant) concerned the claim for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of acquisition of lands comprised in Khasra No.1243 measuring 43 Sq. yards, New Delhi ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »