Skip to content

Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 12 2018

Sunil Garg vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2018 $~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI SUNIL GARG BAIL APPLN. 110/2018 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr. Amar Pal, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. Inspector Pradeep Kumar, PS Naraina. : % ORDER1202.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 110/2018 1. The petitioner seeks Bail in FIR No.126/2012 under Section 420/120B IPC, Police Station Narayana.2. It is contended in the subject FIR that the petitioner had agreed to sell his property bearing No.45, Block-A, measuring 605 sq yds BAIL APPLN. 110/2018 Page 1 of 3 out of 1210 sq yds and registered the sale transfer documents, inter alia, comprising of the Agreement to Sell, Power of Attorney and Will etc. The allegations are that after the property was sold, the petitioner inducted one Sh. Pradeep Bajaj in the property a...


Feb 12 2018

Jamia Arabia Nizamia Welfare Educational Society vs.d.g., Archaeologic ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11675/2016 & CM No.5486/2018 % Date of decision :12. h February, 2018 JAMIA ARABIA NIZAMIA WELFARE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Through : ........ Petitioner versus D.G., ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs. for R-3. Mr.Shams Khwaja,Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, in public interest, complaining that the respondents have failed to declare the Lal Mahal, a monument in the Hazrat Nizamuddin Basti as a protected monument under the The Ancient Monuments & Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (hereafter the Ancient Monuments Act). W.P.(C)No.11675/2016 Page 1 of 10 2. A similar grievance was made by this writ petitioner by way of W.P.(C) 5003/2016, proceedings where...


Feb 12 2018

Dda vs.hill View Apartments

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~8 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th February, 2018 CM(M) 537/2016 and CM APPL.20638/2016 (stay) DDA Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate ........ Petitioner with Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Mr. Hitasish Chauhan, Ms. Vasudha Trivedi, & Ms. Astha Chopra, Advocates. versus HILL VIEW APARTMENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate with ..... Respondent Mr. P. Rath, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is aggrieved with the orders dated 02.02.2013 of the Senior Civil Judge on the file of the civil suit (No.154/2011) of the respondents (the plaintiffs) and dated 29.04.2015 of the Additional District Judge-01 on the file of miscellaneous appeal (MCA No.20/2013) whereby, on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), an ad interim injunction was granted against the DDA (the defendant) restraining it, its officials, administrators, servants, agents...


Feb 12 2018

M/S Prem Enterprises vs.m/s d.b.p Limited & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:12. h February, 2018 FAO(OS) 72/2017 M/S D B P LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Davinder Singh with Mr. Ashish Mittal, Advs. versus M/S D H A F P LIMITED & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal with Mr. Pallav Pandey and Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Advs. for respondent no.6. + FAO(OS) 147/2017 & CM No.18056/2017 M/S PREM ENTERPRISES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal with Mr. Pallav Pandey and Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Advs. versus M/S D.B.P LIMITED & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Davinder Singh with Mr. Ashish Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.18056/2017 (delay of 49 days) in FAO(OS) No.147/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. FAO(OS) Nos.72/2017 & 147/2017 Pg.1 of 24 This application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) No.72/2017 FAO (OS) No.147/2...


Feb 12 2018

Varinder Kaur vs.school Management of Guru Harikrishan Public School & ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 02.2018 LPA3792015 and CM APPL. 10251/2016 VARINDER KAUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Elanchezhiyan, Mr Manzar Anis and Mr Nasim Anwar, Advs. versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURU HARIKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, Ms Astha Sharma and Mr Aditya Madaan, Advs for... RESPONDENTS 1, 2 and 4. Mr Sanjoy Ghose, ASC and Mr Rhishabh Jetley and Ms Urvi Mohan, Adv for GNCTD (R-3) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA1 In the present Letter Patents Appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 07.05.2015 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.3061/2014, wherein her petition seeking quashing of transfer and relieving orders dated 28.04.2014 and 02.05.2014 respectively, was dismissed. LPA3792015 Page 1 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as a clerk vide her appointment letter dated 1...


Feb 12 2018

Chander Bhan vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~8 to 11 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1141/2014 KALI CHARAN Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Prasanna, ..... Appellant STATE Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1143/2014 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 40/2018 SARVESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Ms. Pallavi STATE S. Kansal, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1314/2014 CHANDER BHAN Through: Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary Mr.Gufran Ali, Advocates DHCLSC. ..... Appellant and for STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 1320/2014 AMIT @ MANGRU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. + + + CRL.A. 1141/2014 and connected matters Page 1 of 24 + STATE BIMLESH versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. CRL.A. 795/2014 Through: Mr. A.S. Juneja, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Koll...


Feb 12 2018

Gulvinder Singh vs.the Directorate of Education & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 12, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1285/2018 1. GULVINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paramjeet Singh, Advocate Versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for respondent No.1-DoE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Implementation of Sixth Central Pay Commissions recommendation is sought by petitioner, who claims to have resigned on 11th June, 2009 as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT). For the first time, petitioner had sought release of arrears of pay etc. in terms of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission vide letter of 19th October, 2015 (Annexure P-10), which according to petitioner, was not responded to.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Legal Notice of 11th March, 2016 (Annexure P-11) to seek relief as claimed in this petition was sent to respondent-School but there is no response to it. Learned counsel for petitioner submits t...


Feb 12 2018

Ram Kishan & Anr vs.narinder Pal Singh (Since Deceased) Thr His Lrs & ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~26 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 28/2018 & CM No.5462/2018 Date of decision :12. h February, 2018 RAM KISHAN & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Mukesh Anand, Mr. S.P. Nangia and Mr. Sahil Dhawan, Advs. NARINDER PAL SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through : Mr.B.L.Chawla, Adv. for R-1(a) to 1(c) Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC for R-2 DDA with Ms. Kajri Gupta and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.5462/2018 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 28/2018 3. With regard to an Agreement to Sell dated 8th February, 2012 in favour of the appellants and now deceased defendant Sh. Narinder Pal Singh [predecessor-in-interest of respondent/defendant nos. 1(a) to FAO (OS) 28/2018 Page 1 of 5 (d)]. in respect of the Property No.8599, Deshbandhu Road, Paharganj, New Delhi for a...


Feb 12 2018

Surinder Kumar Mehra vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2018 $~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + SURINDER KUMAR MEHRA STATE & ANR versus CRL.REV.P. 728/2017 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr. Tarun Arora, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. S.S. Kalra, Advocate for respondent No. % ORDER1202.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 728/2017 & Crl.M.A.2600/2018 (for compounding of offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881) 1. The petitioner had sought quashing of conviction order dated 21.03.2017 and Order on Sentence dated 06.04.2017 in Complaint Case No.177/2016 and the order dated 17.08.2017, passed by the Appellate Court rejecting the appeal of the petitioner. CRL.REV.P. 728/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. The sentence awarded to the petitioner was simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay compensation of Rs.1,60,000/- to ...


Feb 12 2018

Sarita and Others vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-12-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved On - 07.02.2018. Date of Decision - 12.02.2018. + W.P.(C) 7369/2017 & C.M.No.30407/2017 SARITA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gaurav Dua with Ms.Vrinda Agarwal, Advocates. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Anita Sahani, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Anuja Saxena, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J1 The... Petitioners, seven in number, have approached this court by way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to allow them to take admission against the left over vacant seats in B.Ed. (Special Education) course run by Respondent No.1 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University for the 2017-18 academic session even though they had, admittedly, appeared only in the Common Entrance Test (hereinafter referred to as CET) for the B.Ed. (General) course and not in the C...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial