Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Master Baljit vs.manoj Kumar Dass & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~R-158 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL372010 Decided on:05. h September, 2017 MASTER BALJIT ..... Appellant Through: None versus MANOJ KUMAR DASS & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur and Mr. Amit Gaur, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then a child aged 9 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 09.10.2005 due to the negligent driving of a vehicle bearing registration no.HR-38H-9914 and suffered injuries, they having been described as degloving injury of left foot and sole and injury to underlying muscles and tendons with bone exposed besides abrasions over sole of right foot. The accident claim case (suit no.137/2007) was instituted on his behalf and prosecuted by his father seeking compensation.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 31.07.2008, held that the injuries have been suffered due to the negligent driving of t...
Ram Niwas Meena & Anr vs.neeraj Kumar Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 577/2017 RAM NIWAS MEENA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Raghuvendra Pandey, Advocate with Inspector Vipin Kumar Sharma, SI C.B. Sharma & SI Bhim Sain, PS New Usman Pur & Inspector Rohtash Kumar RI/NE. ..... Respondent versus NEERAJ KUMAR MISHRA + MAC.APP. 590/2017 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate RAM NIWAS MEENA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Raghuvendra Pandey, Advocate with Inspector Vipin Kumar Sharma, SI C.B. Sharma & SI Bhim Sain, PS New Usman Pur & Inspector Rohtash Kumar RI/NE. versus KAUSHALYA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate CORAM: MAC Appeal No.577 & 590 of 2017 Page 1 of 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Neeraj Kumar Mishra (first respondent in MAC Appeal No.577/2017) was riding on the pillion of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL7 BC5516(motorcycle), driven by his brother Ranjeet Mishra on 11.05.2012, both moving ...
Union of India Through Dy. Chief Engineer vs.b.s. Sangwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~OS-39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05.09.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 235/2017 & IA Nos.6126-6127/2017 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DY. CHIEF ENGINEER...Petitioner Through Mr.N.Prashant Kumar Nair, Adv. versus B.S. SANGWAN ..... Respondent Through Mr.S.W.Haider, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.6127/2017(exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 235/2017 & IA No.6126/2017(stay) 1. The present petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to impugn the Award of the learned Arbitrator dated 21.01.2017.2. The respondent was awarded P.Way linking and other allied works between Rewari to Rohtak section on 29.01.2009 for Rs.5,40,11,614/-. Fifteen months time was allowed for completion of work which was to expire on 28.4.2010. Various extensions were given to the respondent. The time for completion of the work was extended upto 31 months and the total OMP (COMM.) 235/20...
Jeet Ram Sharma vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Shiv Sagar Naik vs.the State Represented By: Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv vs.dlf Universal Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 21 + COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-IV ITA4402009 Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. Rahul, Chaudhary, Standing Counsel for the Revenue ..... Appellant versus DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha & Ms. Roopali Gupta, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % ORDER0509.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 6th June 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1848/Del./2000 & ITA No.1803/Del./2000 for the Assessment Year (AY) 1995-96.2. While admitting this appeal by order dated 30th November, 2011, this Court framed following questions of law: 1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order wherein it was held that the method of accounting followed by the assessee in past and accepted in earlier assessment years...
S K Agarwal vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Mohd. Nadeem & Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1271/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13542/2017 MOHD. NADEEM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with ASI Om Parkash, P.S. Nagloi, Delhi. Mr. Javed Ashrif Khan, Advocate for R-3 and respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0509.2017 % Status report has been filed. Notice to respondent No.3 also. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO ASI Om Parkash. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.124 registered on 13.04.2017 against them with Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 323/341/452/5IPC on the complaint of respondent No.3. Su...
Y P Sharma vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Gauri Devi & Ors vs.ghanshyam Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~R-157 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL242010 and CM11762010 GAURI DEVI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus GHANSHYAM SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In the accident claim case (suit no.485/2002) instituted on 17.09.2002 by the appellants, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 23.09.2008, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.4,96,000/- on account of death of Chander Shekhar Sharma in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 30.08.2002 due to the negligent driving of Toyota Qualis car bearing registration no.DL-3CS-5356 admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent /insurer on which the liability to pay was fastened. The said amount of compensation includes Rs.5,000/- towards funeral charges, Rs.20,000/- towards loss of consortium and Rs.20,000/- ...