Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajan Chauhan & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~23 & 25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (CRL.) 1581/2017 HIMANSHU CHAUHAN & HUNNY & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Handa, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Megha Bahl, Adv. for Mr. Avi Singh, Advocate with SI Parmender, P.S. Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P. (CRL.) 1593/2017 RAJAN CHAUHAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Handa, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Pooja, P.S. Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0509.2017 1. Status report has been filed. W.P. (CRL). No.1581/2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1593/2017 Page 1 of 3 2.3. 4.5. 6. Respondent No.2 Vipin Chauhan in W.P. (CRL.) No.1581/2017, and in the other W.P. (CRL.) No.1593/2017, the respondent No.2 Ms.Manju Chauhan appears in person...
Dr. Baldev Raj Anand & Anr. Vs.dewan Chand Decd. thr.lr & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:5. h September 2017. RFA992006 DR. BALDEV RAJ ANAND & ANR. Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.Anand Padmanabhan, Mr.Kuldeep Gola, Advocates ..... Appellant versus DEWAN CHAND DECD. THR.LR'S &OR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Thukral, Advocate for respondent No.2(c) to 2(f), 3 and 5. Mr. Pravin Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.13, 14, 15 in Review Pet. No.161/2017. Mr. Jagmohan Sabharwal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Seema Singh, Advocate for Garima Anand. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER0509.2017 % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.30682/2017 (Directions) By this application filed under Section 151 CPC, the applicant 1. (respondent No.2C, 2D, 2E, 2F, 3 and5) seeks approval of proforma draft for proclamation of auction under Order 21 Rule 66 of CPC as directed vide order dated 26.04.2016 in R.F.A. No.99/2006. The applicants sought the following prayers:-"R.F.A. No.99/2006 Page 1 of 9 a. b...
Ram Niwas Meena & Anr vs.kaushalya Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 577/2017 RAM NIWAS MEENA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Raghuvendra Pandey, Advocate with Inspector Vipin Kumar Sharma, SI C.B. Sharma & SI Bhim Sain, PS New Usman Pur & Inspector Rohtash Kumar RI/NE. ..... Respondent versus NEERAJ KUMAR MISHRA + MAC.APP. 590/2017 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate RAM NIWAS MEENA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Raghuvendra Pandey, Advocate with Inspector Vipin Kumar Sharma, SI C.B. Sharma & SI Bhim Sain, PS New Usman Pur & Inspector Rohtash Kumar RI/NE. versus KAUSHALYA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate CORAM: MAC Appeal No.577 & 590 of 2017 Page 1 of 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Neeraj Kumar Mishra (first respondent in MAC Appeal No.577/2017) was riding on the pillion of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL7 BC5516(motorcycle), driven by his brother Ranjeet Mishra on 11.05.2012, both moving ...
Vijay Kumar vs.avtar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~33. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. No.412/2017 & CM No.32041/2017 (for stay). VIJAY KUMAR Through: Mr. Ashish Anand and Mr. Saurabh ........ Petitioner Kaumar, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: None. AVTAR SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0509.2017 Caveat No.793/2017.1. None appears for the Caveator inspite of advance copy stated to have been given.2. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.32040/2017 (for exemption).3. 4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RC.REV. No.412/2017 & CM No.32041/2017 (for stay).5. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 15th July, 2017 in ARC No.42/2017 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application of the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / lan...
Om Prakash vs.central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
J P Sharma vs.the State ( Cbi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Indus Towers Ltd. Vs.santosh Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % INDUS TOWERS LTD. RFA No.760/2017 5th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate. versus SANTOSH JAIN Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, ..... Respondent Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun Aggarwal and Ms.Nachiketa Suri, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CAV No.791/2017 Since counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. RFA No.760/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.32070/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 8.5.2017 RFA No.760/2017 Page 1 of 7 decreeing the suit for a sum of Rs.12,03,560/- along with interest. Suit has been decreed for an amount of arrears of license fee as also mesne profits payable after termination of license.2. Facts of the case are that respondent/p...
Sumit Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3775/2017 Date of decision:5. h September, 2017 SUMIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Neelima Rathore proxy counsel for Mr.U.Srivastava, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Harsh Ahuja, Adv. along with Mr.Karamjit Singh, AC-CISF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we feel that writ petition is to be partly allowed in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in Avtar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.(2016) 8 SCC471 2. The... Petitioner, Sumit Kumar was appointed as a Constable (Driver) in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) on 28.12.2013. The petitioner on completion of basic training and was posted at CISF Unit, DAP at Durgapur. WP(C) 3775/2017 Page 1 3. The petitioner was served with charge-sheet on 21.03.2016. The allegation was that the petitioner has con...
Manish Gill & Ors. Vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1575/2017 MANISH GILL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Jan, Advocate versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Jai Chand, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0509.2017 Respondent No.2 appears in person. He is duly identified by the IO SI Jai Chand. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Articleof the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the FIR bearing No.0310/2017, Cr.PC) registered on 25.04.2017 against them with Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 323/342/5IPC, on the complaint of respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties are for quashing of % 1.2. 3. W.P. (Crl.) 1575/2017 Page 1 of 2 students and they are residing at Mukherjee Nagar in Payin...
Zulfiqar Ali & Anr vs.mohd Idrish & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~46. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) No.965/2017 & CM No.32348/2017 (for stay). ZULFIQAR ALI & ANR Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. MOHD IDRISH & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0509.2017 CM No.32349/2017 (for exemption) and CM No.32350/2017 (exemption from filing part Trial Court record).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM(M) No.965/2017 & CM No.32348/2017 (for stay).3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order (dated 1st August, 2017 in CS No.162/2015 of the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi) of dismissal in limine of the application filed by the petitioners / defendants no.2&3 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking recall of the order dated 7th July, 2017 striking off the right of the petitioners / defendants no.2&3 to defend the s...
- ‹ Prev
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- Next ›
- Last »