Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anurag Grover & Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2523/2017 ANURAG GROVER & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Prabhjit ms.Aishwarya, Adv. with petitioners in person. Jauhar, Adv. with versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with ASI Yogdutt, P.S. K.N. Katju Marg. Mr.Tarun Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Amrinder Singh, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0409.2017 Crl.M.A. 14470/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2523/2017 1. Notice. Learned APP for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by ASI Yogdutt. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the 2....
Rahul Sharma & Ors vs.manoj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~10, 11, 14 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 740/2016 and CM328562016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus RAHUL SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. D.K. Singh, Ms. Shanti Ranjan, Advocates for R-4 + MAC.APP. 741/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus SATENDER MISHRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. for R-1 to 3 MACA Nos.740-741/16, 7& 2Page 1 of 11 Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. D.K. Singh, Ms. Shanti Ranjan, Advocates for R-5 + MAC.APP. 743/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus RAHUL SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak ...
Bansal Plywood vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:03. 07.2017 Judgment pronounced on:04. 09.2017 + CRL.A. 17/2017 BANSAL PLYWOOD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Surender Gupta, Adv. with appellant in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. Mr.Ahmad Waseem, Adv. with Mr.Muqeem Ahmed, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to impugned judgment dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Trial Court whereby respondents 2 & 3 were acquitted for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act).2. Brief facts leading to the present criminal appeal are that the appellant, a proprietary firm through sole proprietor Pawan Bansal is engaged in the business of supplying timber and plywood. The respondent no.3 is the proprietor of respondent no.2 firm M/s Bosecage. Respondent no.1 through its proprietor Cr...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs.index Securities P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~ * 2 to 7 + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.566/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus INDEX SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Agarwal with Mr. Ravi Pratap, Advocates. With ITA No.567/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Advocate. versus VIDYA SHANKAR INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Agarwal with Mr. Ravi Pratap, Advocates. + With ITA No.568/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ITA No.566/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 21 (CENTRAL)-2 Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Anand Chaudhuri, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus VIDYA SHANKAR INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Agarwal with Mr. Ravi Pratap, Advoc...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ambience Education Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 09.2017 LPA6902016 & CM Nos.45753/2016 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mansi Gupta and Mr. Govind, Advs. for SDMC. versus AMBIENCE EDUCATION SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Adv. LPA4062017 & CM No.20520-20521/2017 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advs. for SDMC. versus FOUNDATION FOR ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION FORE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. R.K. Joshi and Mr. Saurabh Joshi, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Ms. Isha Garg, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR LPA Nos.690/2016 & 406/2017 Page 1 of 5 MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. Both the appeals were heard...
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd vs.jagdish Prasad Yadav and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 965/2016 SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. versus JAGDISH PRASAD YADAV AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Adv. for R- 1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (MACP362011- new MACT No.15170/2015) was instituted by the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) on 19.01.2011, seeking compensation on account of death of their bachelor son Vipin Yadav in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 12.11.2010, on the basis of averments that the collision against the motorcycle of the deceased (bearing registration No HR35 8213) had occurred due to negligent driving of Tavera Car bearing registration No.HR55T7798(the car) by the third respondent, it being registered in the name of fourth respondent MAC Appeal No.965/2016 Page 1 of 3 and admittedly insured against thir...
Shivshankar Saluja & Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1563/2017 SHIVSHANKAR SALUJA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. petitioners in person. Jayant Pawar, Advocate with versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Virender Kumar, P.S. KNK Marg, Delhi. Mr. Ankit respondent No.2 in person. Sharma, Advocate along with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0409.2017 % Status report has been filed. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.333/2015, registered on 25.03.2015 against them with Police Station KN Katju Marg, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC read with Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 on the complaint of respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 accompanied by her mother has appeared in person. She is be...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.rahul Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~10, 11, 14 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 740/2016 and CM328562016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus RAHUL SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. D.K. Singh, Ms. Shanti Ranjan, Advocates for R-4 + MAC.APP. 741/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus SATENDER MISHRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. for R-1 to 3 MACA Nos.740-741/16, 7& 2Page 1 of 11 Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. D.K. Singh, Ms. Shanti Ranjan, Advocates for R-5 + MAC.APP. 743/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus RAHUL SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Mahajan and Mr. Deepak ...
Ex- Ct. Rana Pratap Singh vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7758/2017 Date of decision:4. h September, 2017 EX- CT. RANA PRATAP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. L. Ojha & Mr. Akash Ojha, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This is the second round by the petitioner, who is an ex- Constable in the Border Security Force (BSF).2. The petitioner was tried vide General Security Force Court on six charges, including four charges under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing murder of three Bangladeshi nationals and for attempting to take life of another Bangladesh civilian after entering Bangladesh. Another change was the petitioner had left the picket with which he was stationed without orders from the superior officers.3. The petitioner had pleaded not guilty. Evidence was lead. After...
Pooja Maan vs.dhanpati Maan & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h September, 2017. C.R.P. No.195/2017 & CM No.32105/2017 (for stay). POOJA MAAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhjit Aishwarya, Advs. Jauhar and Ms. versus DHANPATI MAAN & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.32106/2017 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRP No.195/2017 & CM No.32105/2017 (for stay).3. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order (dated 4th May, 2017 in Counter Claim no.03/16, Judge Code: DL0804of the Court of Civil Judge-I, New Delhi District, New Delhi) of dismissal of the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC of the petitioner / plaintiff for rejection of the counter claim of respondent no.1/defendant/counter claimant.4. 5. The counsel for the petitioner has been heard. The petitioner has instituted a suit against the...
- ‹ Prev
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- Next ›
- Last »