Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devender Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.kushal Kishore Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t September, 2017 RC.REV. No.410/2017 & CM No.31872/2017 (for stay). DEVENDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Manu Sishodia and Mr. Hitesh Saini, Advs. versus ..... Respondent KUSHAL KISHORE AGGARWAL Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.31873/2017 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RC.REV. No.410/2017 & CM No.31872/2017 (for stay).3. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 4th May, 2017 in E.No.2(New No.236/17) of the Pilot Court (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioners / tenants for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / landlord and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioners / tenants from one room / garage open...
Edgecliffe Developers Llp vs.m/s Neelamber Associates Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
17 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2858/2015 EDGECLIFFE DEVELOPERS LLP Through: Ms. Padma Priya, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S NEELAMBER ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Gurkamal Hora Arora, Advocate for applicant-defendant. Date of Decision:01. t September, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): I.As. 9961-9963/2017 1. Present application being I.A. 9961/2017 has been filed by the applicant-defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 4 read with Order IX Rule 13 and Section 151 CPC for setting aside judgment and decree dated 24th February, 2016 and 02nd June, 2016.2. Learned counsel for applicant-defendant states that the entire transaction of subscription of equity shares and issuing of cheques by plaintiff was a sham transaction carried out by Mr. D.K. Gupta, one of the present Directors of the defendant, in collusion and in connivance with CS(OS) 2858/2015 Page 1 of 3 partners of plaintiff.3. It is contended...
Harmani Arora & Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2510/2017 HARMANI ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tarun Walia, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Sanjay Through Mr. Lao, ASC with Mr.Siddarth Sindhu, Advocate with ASI Vinod Kumar, P.S. Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi. Mr.Kamakshi Garg, Advocate respondent No.2 in person. along with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0109.2017 Crl.M.A. 14372/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2510/2017 1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.102/2016, registered on 16.02.2016 against them with Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, North West District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. Notice ...
Satya Prakash vs.amit Jain & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t September, 2017 RC.REV. No.408/2017 SATYA PRAKASH ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. O.P. Faizi, Adv. Versus AMIT JAIN & ANR. Through: None. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.31863/2017 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RC.REV. 408/2017 & CM No.31863/2017 (for stay) 3. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 20th May, 2017 in Eviction Petition No.253/2017 (Old No.) / 293/2017 (New No.) of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC), Pilot Court (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondents and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from residential flat No.2, First Floor of Property No.1416, K...
Fight for Human Rights vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.10285/2016 Date of decision :1. t September, 2017 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through : Ms. K.R. Chitra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Gautam Through : Mr. Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. R.A. and Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Iyer CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition is filed by the writ petitioner seeking the following prayers : a) Direct respondent 1 to remove all metal structures and tiles etc. dismantled from BRT corridor between Moolchand and Ambedkar Nagar New Delhi covering length of 5.8 KM of whole corridor immediately and in any case within a period of 7 days. Direct respondent 2 to grant the requisite approval b) to the project of construction of 6 half sub-merged sub-ways along the whole stretch. W.P.(C)No.10285/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. c) Direct respondent no.1 to relay...
Fernas Construction India Pvt Ltd vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2057/2017 & CRL.M.A. 13452/2017 FERNAS CONSTRUCTION INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ajay Bhargava, Mr.Rajiv Bhatnagar and Ms.Meherunnisa Anand, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State with IO Insp.Ram Kishan, DIU/South West, Delhi. Mr.R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for R-2 along with Mr.Amit respondent no.2/ company. Jha, Director of CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0109.2017 1.2. A joint application has been filed by the petitioner and the respondent No.2 to the effect that pursuant to the registration of the FIR, the parties have amicably settled the present dispute being the subject matter of the FIR No.166/2017 dated 04.06.2017 registered with PS Dwarka (North) under Section 406 of IPC which may be quashed. Along with the application, settlement agreement dated 09.08.2017 between the parties is placed...
Ravinder Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1509/2014 RAVINDER SINGH versus STATE Judgment Reserved On:31. 05.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:01. 09.2017 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Ms. Manoranjani, Advocates ... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SHO Raj Kumar, P.S. BHD Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTHMRIDUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTHMRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provisions of section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the CrPC) assails the judgment dated 18.02.2013 and the order on sentence dated 23.02.2013, rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge (Special CRL.A.1509/2014 Page 1 of 26 Fast Track Court), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Sessions Case No.01/13, in FIR No.211/2012, registered at P.S. Baba Hari Dass Nagar.2. By way of the impugned judgment dated 18.02.2013, the appellant has been convicted for the commission of offences punishable under the provis...
- ‹ Prev
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- Next ›