Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Prakash Narang vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Roshni Raman vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 08.2017 Pronounced on:05. 09.2017 LPA5682017 & CM Nos.30960-30961/2017 ROSHNI RAMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rachit Mehrotra and Mr. I. S. Singh, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent-UOI. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for respondent-Delhi University. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant preferred a writ petition (W.P.(C) No.7183/2017) which is pending on the file of this Court. She was an applicant in the CW Category and sought admission on the basis of a priority, which the University of Delhi (the University) had published to give effect to the Union, Ministry of Defence (MoD) circular of 19.05.2017. In short, the preference is by way of a reservation of wards/widows of five categories of personnel who are either killed in action or disabled and...
Kendirya Sainik Board & Ors. Vs.dhairya Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:29. 08.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:05. 09.2017 LPA5212017 & & C.M. 27500-01/2017 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates. Versus ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & Mr. Pushkar Prehar, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for UOI. LPA5522017 & C.M. 29781, 82, 83, 84/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus SAHIL DALAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates for R-2. Mr. R. Balasubramanium and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates for respondent. + LPA5542017 & C.M. 29809, 10, 11, 12/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus LPA521 552, 554 & 555/2017 Page 1 of 17 ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & M...
Amit Tanwar & Ors vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2426/2017 AMIT TANWAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Pankaj Tanwar, Advocate with Mr.D.S. Tomar, Advocate and petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC, for the State with SI Ravi Yadav, P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi. Mr. Munish Chhoker, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0509.2017 % Respondent No.2 is present. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO Ravi Yadav. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.420 registered on 14.04.2015 against them with Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur, South Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. The marriage of the peti...
Brajesh Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4898/2015 Reserved on:13. h July, 2017 Date of decision :05. h September, 2017 BRAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.V.Subramaniam T.R., Mr.Rahat Bansal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P.Singh, Advocate for R-1 to 4/UOI W.P.(C) 5293/2015 UMED SINGH Through Mr.V.Subramaniam T.R., ........ Petitioner versus Mr.Rahat Bansal, Advocates UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Mukesh Kr.Tiwari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The above two petitions have been filed placing reliance on the judgment dated 3rd April, 2013 of this High Court in WP(C) No.1285/2012 tilted Bhavana Upadhyay vs. Union of India & Anr., which held that where the officer was not promoted alongwith his/her WP(C) Nos.4898/2015 & 5293/2015 Page 1 batch mates due to non-clearing of the ...
Yesudanam vs.the State Represented By: Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Natha Ram Suman vs.state (Cbi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Leela Ram Yadav & Ors. Vs.amit Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.762/2013 LEELA RAM YADAV & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash, Adv. versus RAJINDER SINGH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Adv. + MAC APPEAL No.763/2013 LEELA RAM YADAV & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash, Adv. versus AMIT KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Amit Kumar (first respondent in MAC Appeal No.763/2013) was riding on the pillion of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL4 AY7850(the motorcycle) driven by Pradeep Kumar on 17.10.2006 moving in the direction of Najafgarh. When the motorcycle had reached near Grain Market at about 6.16 p.m., it came to be involved in a collision with truck bearing registration No.UP32W4040 (the truck) driven by the first appellant (Leela Ram Yadav) in these MAC Appeal No.762 & 763 of 2013 Page 1 of 7 appeals, the vehicle b...
Kendriya Sainik Board & Ors. Vs.sahil Dalal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:29. 08.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:05. 09.2017 LPA5212017 & & C.M. 27500-01/2017 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates. Versus ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & Mr. Pushkar Prehar, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for UOI. LPA5522017 & C.M. 29781, 82, 83, 84/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus SAHIL DALAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates for R-2. Mr. R. Balasubramanium and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates for respondent. + LPA5542017 & C.M. 29809, 10, 11, 12/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus LPA521 552, 554 & 555/2017 Page 1 of 17 ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & M...
Nitin Fire Protection Industries Limited vs.gail (India) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~OS-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 09.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 332/2017 NITIN FIRE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES LIMITED........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shikhil Suri, Mr.Shiv Kumar Suri and Ms.Shilpa Saini, Advs. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ajit Pudussery and Mr.A.S.Verma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.10145/2017 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. IA No.10143/2017 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 25 days in re- filing the present petition is condoned. Application is allowed. O.M.P. (COMM) 332/2017 & IA No.10144/2017 (Stay) 1. This petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as The Act) seeking to impugn the Award dated 12.4.2017 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. Some of the brief facts are that the petitioner, the respondent and five other entit...
- ‹ Prev
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- Next ›
- Last »