Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Company Limited vs.reema Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-162 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 43/2010 and CM APPL.1613/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA REEMA DEVI & ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Punjab Singh had borrowed the motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-10-H-4181 from his brother Satish (fifth respondent), who was the registered owner of the said vehicle, at whose instance the appellant insurance company had issued the insurance policy. On 03.11.2005 at about 8:30 p.m., while coming from Alipur he lost control over the vehicle and as a consequence, he struck against a branch of tree lying on road resulting in he falling down and suffered injuries that proved fatal. His wife and three members of the family dependent on him, first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants), brought accident claim case (Petition No.979/20...
Delhi Development Authority vs.m/s Trilok & Co. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex.S.A No.3/2017 + % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: versus M/s TRILOK & CO. & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA6h September, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is a body which controls and owns huge tracts of land in Delhi. DDA is sometimes infamous with respect to its dealings with common citizens and especially poor persons who have no approach. This second appeal filed in execution proceedings is a classic reminder that certain officers in bodies like DDA have made it almost their determination to harass commons citizens of this country and may be even for certain unstated reasons. These strong observations are made by this Court as the same are required in the facts of the case, and as stated hereinafter. Ex.S.A. No.3/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. This is an Execution Second Appeal. The executin...
Inaam Singh vs.upsrtc & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-166 & 167 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.69/2010 INAAM SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus UPSRTC & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. for R-2. + MAC APPEAL No.114/2010 ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. versus INAAM SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Inaam Singh, appellant in MAC Appeal No.69/2010, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 18.11.2004 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.UP81 9644, admittedly insured against third party risk with Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant in MAC appeal No.114/2010). He instituted accident claim case (suit No.308/2005) on 15.07.2005 MAC Appeal No.69/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 3 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him which included fractured ribs, he having be...
A K Srivastava and Anr vs.delhi Cooperative Tribunal and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7848/2017 and CM APPL. 32460-32461/2017 A K SRIVASTAVA AND ANR Through: Mr. G.L. Verma, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus DELHI COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate with Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for R-2/RCS. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER0609.2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing an order dated 31.08.2017 passed by the learned Delhi Cooperative Tribunal on an appeal preferred by Shri O.P. Nirwan and others, whereby the Deputy Registrar has been restrained from passing any order on the claim petition filed by the petitioners herein.2. Pertinently, the petitioners have not impleaded Shri O.P. Nirwan and others or the House Building Society as respondents in the present proceedings. Counsel for the respondent No.2/RCS clarifies that Shri O.P. Nirwan is the President of the Executive Committee of...
Ravi Singhal vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 06, 2017 LPA5832017 & C.M. 32386/2017 RAVI SINGHAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra & Mr. Shantanu, Advocates Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahni, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. T.S. Singhdev & Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellants grievance is with respect to the order of the learned Single Judge rejecting his writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to permit him to migrate from Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam to North DMC Medical College, Bara Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi.2. Appellant was admitted to the Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam on the basis of ranking in the pre-medical test conducted in the academic year 2015-16. After completion of his first...
Manjeet Singh vs.sant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h September, 2017. CM(M) 974/2017 MANJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mohd. Azam Ansari, Adv. Versus SANT KAUR Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CMs No.32451/2017 & 32452/2017 (both for exemption) ..... Respondent 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) 974/2017 & CM No.32450/2017 (for stay) 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-05 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to, in Civ DJ/611263/2016 titled Sant Kaur Vs. Manjeet Singh, first decide the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the petitioner/ defendant, before compelling the counsel for the petitioner/ defendant to cross-examination PW1.4. The application aforesaid under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was filed on 17th August, 2017 when the suit was listed for cross-exa...
National Insurance Company Limited vs.jagdish & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 218/2017 and CM APPL.9124/2017 (stay) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JAGDISH & ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through: ........ RESPONDENTS 1. On 22.09.2014, Vipin Kumar, aged over 18 years and nine months (born on 01.01.1996), a bachelor, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident at about 10:45 p.m. involving negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL-1YD-1753, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) and died in the consequence. Accident claim case (MACP No.13/2015) instituted by his parents, first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), resulted in judgment dated 06.01.2017, whereby compensation in the total sum of Rs.16,35,040/- has been awarded and the insurer has been directed to pay the same with interest @ nine per cent (...
M/S Aec Ssangyong Ltd. & Anr vs.m/s Infinity Sez Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3508/2017 & CM No.15310/2017 M/S AEC SSANGYONG LTD. & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pushkar Sood, Advocate along with Mr. Virendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. versus 1. M/S INFINITY SEZ PVT. LTD. & ORS Through: Mr. Ajit Yadav, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Nitin Dahiya, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Surekh Kant Baxy, Advocate along with Mr. Ashish Rana, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % Pleadings qua respondent No.1 are complete. Learned counsel for ORDER0609.2017 petitioners states that the respondent No.2 and respondent No.3 are co-lenders qua petitioner No.2. Respondent No.4 is a sister concern of petitioner No.1.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 28.03.2017 passed by the learned DRAT on an appeal filed by it against the order dated 20.05.2015 passed by DRT-1, Delhi in an Appeal No.21/14.3. Under the impugned order, the DRAT has directed the peti...
State vs.anand Kumar Jha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. L.P.512/2017 % STATE Date of Decision:6. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms.Anaya Singh, Advocate Versus ANAND KUMAR JHA Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 14642/2017(delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 99 days in filing of the petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. Crl. L.P.512/2017 3. The petitioner, by way of this petition, is seeking leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 21.02.2017 passed by Learned Additional Session Judge, Karkardooma Court, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.44573/2015 arising out of FIR Crl.L.P.512/2017 Page 1 of 12 No.22/2011 under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas.4. The case of the prosecution as noticed by the Trial Court is that on 05.01.2015 PW-7 Yasm...
Anil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 05, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 7799/2017, CM Nos. 32194-32195/2017 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: In person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. for R1. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. H.K. Naik, Mr. Rajnish, Mr. P.S. Neriwal, Mr. Ajay Amritraj and Mr. Sudhanshu Palo, Advs. for R2, R3 and R5. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In view of the aforesaid facts, submissions and circumstances of the case, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: a. issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the entire charge sheet No.UT/O- DHRD-3414/IR-5(4)/2016-17 dated June 27, 2016, as non est in the eye of law; b. issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari or ...
- ‹ Prev
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- Next ›
- Last »