Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Kumar Singhal vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Krishan Mohan Gupta vs.om Prakash Khandelwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 164/2017 and CM No.20058/2017 Date of decision :5. h September, 2017 KRISHAN MOHAN GUPTA Through : Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. ..... Appellant versus OM PRAKASH KHANDELWAL Through : Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 We have heard ld. counsel for the parties in this appeal.2. By way of this appeal, the appellant has laid a challenge to observations made by the ld. Single Judge in the order dated 13th April, 2017 passed in CS(OS)No.82/2017 whereby a preliminary decree holding that the parties held equal shares in the property bearing Municipal No.B-248, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi, was passed. It has been submitted by Mr. S.C. Singhal, ld. counsel for the appellant that he has no objection to the order dated 13th of April 2017, to the extent of the preliminary decree or the appointment of a ...
Mohit Sharma vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~26 * + 1.2. 3.4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2182/2017 MOHIT SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State with SI Rajpal Singh, P.S. Uttam Nagar. Ms.Anjali, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0509.2017 % Respondent No.3 is present in court along with her mother. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Rajpal Singh. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.252/2013, registered against him on 16.05.2013 with Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi under Section 341/506/354-A IPC on the complaint of respondent No.3. It is submitted by the Additional S...
Inderprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi vs.anshit Verma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5802017, C.M. APPL.32093/2017 & 32111/2017 Decided on:05. 09.2017 INDERPRASTHA TECHNOLOGY DELHI INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Arjun Mitra, Advocate with Sh. K.P. Singh, Deputy Registrar. versus ANSHIT VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Respondent No. Sh. Ravi Prakash, Advocate, for Sh. Rhishabh Jetley, for Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, for GNCTD. Ms. Palak Rohmetra, for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate, on behalf of DTU. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. Issue notice. Sh. Ravi Prakash; Sh. Rhishabh Jetley and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates accept notice.2. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal was LPA5802017 Page 1 of 13 heard finally.3. The appellant is aggrieved by the direction of the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment which required it to admit the first respondent [hereafter referred to a...
Om Prakash vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
Abdul Rashid Rather vs.raju @ Raju Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~45. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. No.197/2017 ABDUL RASHID RATHER Through: Mr. Bharat Ahuja, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus Through: None. RAJU @ RAJU KUMAR & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0509.2017 ........ RESPONDENTS CM No.32359/2017 (for condonation of 18 days delay in filing).1. 2. For the reasons stated, allowed. The application stands disposed of. CM No.32358/2017 (for exemption).3. 4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.R.P. No.197/2017.5. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order (dated 24th April, 2017 in CS No.111/2017 of the Court of Additional District Judge-02, Central, Delhi) of dismissal of the application of the petitioner / plaintiff under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the counter claim filed by the respondent / defendant no.4 Ashok Puri to the suit filed by the petitioner / plaintiff.6. The counsel for t...
Hayat Singh vs.the State Represented By: Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 150/2016 S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A. 259/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Amitej Kr. Nagar, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with ..... Respondent Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. ..... Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented by: Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn. matters Page 1 of 177 + Represented by: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Spl. PP with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advs. CRL.A. 280/2016 JEET RAM SHARMA ..... Appella...
University of Delhi & Anr. Vs.zoya Gill & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:29. 08.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:05. 09.2017 LPA5212017 & & C.M. 27500-01/2017 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates. Versus ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & Mr. Pushkar Prehar, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for UOI. LPA5522017 & C.M. 29781, 82, 83, 84/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus SAHIL DALAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates for R-2. Mr. R. Balasubramanium and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates for respondent. + LPA5542017 & C.M. 29809, 10, 11, 12/2017 KENDRIYA SAINIK BOARD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus LPA521 552, 554 & 555/2017 Page 1 of 17 ZOYA GILL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. I.S. Singh, Mr. Abhishek Singh & M...
Rajesh Dua & Anr. Vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 05, 2017 W.P.(C) 6478/2017 & CM APPL. 26819/2017 RAJESH DUA & ANR. Through: Versus Sh. Vishal Maan, Advocate ........ Petitioners GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondent- L&B/LAC Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates for respondent- DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Liberty is sought to place on record counter affidavit. Liberty granted. Counter affidavit is taken on record.2. The petitioners claim declaration that the entire acquisition proceedings in respect of petitioners plot bearing No.E ad-measuring 366 square yards in Khasra No.1403 min (0-07), situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Tehar, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi (presently known as Pratap Nagar, New Delhi-64) have lapsed. The petitioners land was not...
Himanshu Chauhan & Hunny & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
$~23 & 25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (CRL.) 1581/2017 HIMANSHU CHAUHAN & HUNNY & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Handa, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Megha Bahl, Adv. for Mr. Avi Singh, Advocate with SI Parmender, P.S. Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P. (CRL.) 1593/2017 RAJAN CHAUHAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Handa, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Pooja, P.S. Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER0509.2017 1. Status report has been filed. W.P. (CRL). No.1581/2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1593/2017 Page 1 of 3 2.3. 4.5. 6. Respondent No.2 Vipin Chauhan in W.P. (CRL.) No.1581/2017, and in the other W.P. (CRL.) No.1593/2017, the respondent No.2 Ms.Manju Chauhan appears in person...
- ‹ Prev
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- Next ›
- Last »