Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Kumar vs.bureau of Indian Standards & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 07, 2017 + W.P.(C) 440/2016 & C.M.1751/2016 MANISH KUMAR AND + W.P.(C) 444/2016 & C.M.1758/2016 ROSY DHAWAN Through: Mr. Ajit Warrier, Advocate versus BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS & ANR .....Respondents .....Petitioners Through: Mr. B.K. Sood and Mr.Harish Gaur, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent- UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 In ORDER (ORAL) the above-captioned petitions, the challenge is to two Communications of 4th January, 2016 (Annexure P-1) vide which petitioner-Manish Kumar has been transferred from HRBO, Chandigarh to EROL, Kolkata and petitioner-Rosy Dhawan has been transferred from P&C Headquarters-New Delhi, to Head (RJBO), Rajkot, Gujarat.2. While entertaining these petitions, it was directed that status quo in respect of impugned Communications be maintained.3. Since the grounds to challenge the impugned communications in the above captioned two petitions are on...
Shubham Chawla vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1549/2017 Order reserved on:05. h December, 2017 Order pronounced on:7. h December, 2017 SHUBHAM CHAWLA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Suri, Mr. Rishabh Relan, Mr.Siddharth Kaushik, Advocates with parents of the petitioner. versus THE STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Ashok, P.S- Amar Colony. Mr. Hardev Chadha, Advocate with complainant and her parents in person. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No.264/2017, under Section 354/323/341/506/427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC), registered by P.S. Amar Colony, New-Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complaint was lodged by Ketika/complainant alleging that on 07.07.2017 at around 09.30 am, when...
Vikas Lohia vs.beena Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~R-674 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12262012 VIKAS LOHIA Through: versus None ..... Appellant BEENA SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (suit no.13/2011) instituted on 10.03.2011 by the first to third respondents (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 21.07.2012, held that the motor vehicular accident, resulting in the death of Surender Kumar Sharma @ S.K. Sharma, giving rise to cause of action for claim case had occurred due to negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-0123 by the fifth respondent (driver), he having been engaged for such purposes by the appellant (owner), both of them being held, jointly and severally, liable to pay compensation.2. The bus was concededly insured against third party risk with the fourth respondent (insu...
Renu Khanna & Ors vs.joginder Pal Madan & Ors (Hdfc Ergo General Insur ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~28 * % + MAC.APP. 184/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. h December, 2017 RENU KHANNA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Mr. Suresh Kumar and Mr. Rahul Mohod, Advocates versus JOGINDER PAL MADAN & ORS (HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD)........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby 1. compensation of Rs. 25,75,000/- has been awarded to the appellant Nos. 1 to 3.2. The accident dated 20th November, 2013 resulted in the death of Rajesh Khanna. The deceased was aged 49 years at the time of accident and was survived by his mother, widow, daughter and son, who filed the application for compensation before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was an accountant with E2 Solutions earning Rs.2,88,000/- per annum. The deceased was also working as a part-time accountan...
Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.442/2005 Reserved on:11. h November 2017 Decided on:7. h December, 2017 MARUTI UDYOG LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. S. Sukumaran, Mr. Anand Sukumar, Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr. Bhupesh Pathak, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Puneet Rai, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr. Gaurav Kheterpal, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT0712.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Assessee against the impugned order dated 28th March 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.678/Del/2004 for the AY200001.2. While admitting this appeal on 24th April 2006, the following questions of law were framed for consideration: ITA No.442/2005 Page 1 of 3 i. Whether the ITAT erred in law in confirming the disallowance ...
Vinod Bangwal vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 4th December, 2017 Order pronounced on 7th December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 2365/2017 VINOD BANGWAL ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Shailani, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Satish Lohia, PS-Hauz Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 This is an application under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.PC) seeking Regular Bail in case FIR No.3under Section 448/467/471/120B of Indian Penal Code (herein referred to as IPC) registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, New Delhi.2. The brief and necessary facts of the case is that on the complaint of Col. Bhupinder Singh Bains s/o Darbara Singh Bains, a case FIR No.329/2017 dated 19.09.2017 u/s 448/467/471/120B IPC was registered at PS Hauz Khas, South Delhi alleging that the complainant is the legal heir of Mrs. Ajit Kaur w/o Darbar...
Travellers Exchange Corporation Limited & Ors vs.celebrities Managemen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~1(CS) * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : DECEMBER07 2017 CS(COMM) 51/2016, and I.As. No.1110/2016 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) 1152/2017 (u/S124of the Trademarks Act) TRAVELLERS EXCHANGE CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.J.Sai Deepak, Advocate with Mr.Mohit Goel, Mr.Sidhant Goel, Mr.Bharadwaj Jaishankar and Mr.Ashutosh Nagar, Advocates versus CELEBRITIES MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Abhishek Puri, Advocate with Mr.V.Siddharth, Mr.Yasharth Misra and Ms.Surbhi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) IA No.12078/2016 [u/O11R-1 (5) CPC].1. The instant IA has been filed by the plaintiffs to place on record additional documents detailed in para (6) of the application. It is contested by the defendant. CS (COMM) 51/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. The suit is still at an initial stage and issues have not yet been framed. It is urged by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs that these documents are material...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.amarjeet Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~R-667 & 668 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12112012 and CM196002012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus AMARJEET SINGH & ORS. Through: None + MAC APPEAL3522013 AMARJEET SINGH & ORS. Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellants RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Amarjeet Singh (the claimant) had instituted accident claim case (MACT3922008) on 03.07.2009 seeking compensation for the injuries sustained and the disability consequently suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had taken place on 28.03.2009 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as JCB bearing registration MACA Nos. 1211/2012 & 352/2013 Page 1 of 5 no.HR-69-8650, which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with Reliance General In...
Raj Singh vs.bhagat Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~R-665 & 666 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"7th December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1207/2012 ..... Appellant ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Suman Bagga with Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocate. versus RAJ SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-1. + MAC.APP. 1223/2012 RAJ SINGH Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar with ..... Appellant versus Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-1. BHAGAT SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga with Ms. Anjali Chawla, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (Suit No.260/11) was filed by Raj Singh (the claimant) on 14.11.2008, seeking compensation for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 10.09.2008, it involving collision between two vehicles, one a MAC App. No.1207/2012 & 1223/2012 Page 1 of 7 motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-3S-AH-4319 (the motorcycle) and, the ot...
The State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.hari Kishan @ Bunty & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2017
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: December 7, 2017. CRL.L.P. 700/2017 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Balbir Singh, Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi ..... Respondent versus HARI KISHAN @ BUNTY & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral) % Crl. M.A. No.20190/2017 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.A. No.20189/2017 (Condonation of delay of 86 days in filing the leave petition) The State has filed the application under Section 5 of the 1. Limitation Act for seeking condonation of delay of 86 days in preferring the accompanying leave read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C. Crl.L.P.No.700/2017 Page 1of 10 petition to challenge the impugned judgment dated 13.04.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions J...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »