Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 34 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Reliance General Insurance Company Limited vs.renu Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-677 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h December, 2017 + MAC. APP. 1234/2012 & CM No.20248/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus RENU SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi, Advocate with Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (Suit No.95/11), instituted on 06.01.2011, by the first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants) prayed for award of compensation under Section 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on account of death of Manoj Sharma, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 06.12.2010, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tata truck bearing registration No.DL-1GB-6743. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 03.09.2012, accepted the said case awarding compensation in the sum of Rs.45,30,250/-, fastening the liability to pay with ...
Tag this Judgment!Unique Hydrographic Systems Pvt Ltd vs.gail India Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:08. h December, 2017 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 510/2017 UNIQUE HYDROGRAPHIC SYSTEMS PVT LTD Through : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, ........ Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Mr.Sandeep Bisht, Mr.Anshumaan Bahadur, Mr.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates. versus GAIL INDIA LTD & ORS. Through : Ms.Purnima ........ RESPONDENTS Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Ateev Mathur, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr.Navin Kumar, Ms.Rashmeet Kaur, Ms.Arpana Majumdar, Advocates for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition is under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 wherein the petitioner has made the following prayers: O.M.P. I (COMM.) 510/2017 Page 1 of 11 final disposal of a) Pass an order directing the Respondent No.3 not to release any amount in respect of the bank guarantee No.171020506929-LP dated 08.12.2016 of amount INR5503,...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Gcg Transglobal Housing Project Pvt Ltd vs.surakshit Exports Priva ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 203/2017 & I.As. 667/20012, 11213/2015, 11221/2015 #31 M/S GCG TRANSGLOBAL HOUSING PROJECT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Raman Kapoor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocates. Plaintiffs Mr. Gautam Misra, Mr. Chaitanya Misra and Mr. Vinod Kumar Misra in person. versus SURAKSHIT EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Dinesh Rastogi with Ms. Harshita Agarwal, Advocates. Mr. Sridev Sharma, Defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ORDER0812.2017 On 6th December, 2017, the Joint Registrar had passed the following $~ * + % 1. order:-"It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that this matter has been settled & they requests for recording of their statement. Learned counsel for the parties submits that after recording of their statements this matter may be fixed before Honble Court for recording of settlement but not before the Honble Court of Justice Rajiv Saha...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhbir Kataria vs.state Delhi Administration
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:7. h November,2017 Order pronounced on:8. h December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 1682/2017 SUKHBIR KATARIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Mr. M. P. Sinha and Mr. Kanwar Kochhar, Advocates. versus STATE DELHI ADMINISTRATION Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent (Criminal) with Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with Inspector Paramvir Dahiya, PS-Vasant Vihar. Mr. Harish Tyagi, Superintendent and Mr.Anjani Kumar, Dy. Superintendent, Tihar Jail, Delhi. Inspector P. S. Rana, 3rd Bn. Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Advocate with Ms.Prachee Satija, Mr. Prakash Airan, Mr.Sachin Gautam, Advocates for the complainant. Ms. Reena Chaudhary, Medical Record Incharge, Vimhans Primamed Hospital CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred Cr.P.C.) for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.964/201...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Kumar vs.sbi Life Indurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 08, 2017 W.P.(C) 10935/2017 RAJESH KUMAR Through: In person. ........ Petitioner Versus SBI LIFE INDURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra & Mr. Aditya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL... Petitioner is aggrieved by termination of his insurance agency by respondent and seeks its restoration with direction to respondents to pay the renewal commission from the date of termination, till the date of payment with interest.... Petitioner claims that he was appointed as respondents Insurance Agent and was issued license of 27th October, 2010 (Annexure P-1) by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. It is pertinent to note that this license was valid up to 26th October, 2013.... Petitioner, who appears in person, has chosen to argue this petition by submitting that the requisite fee to renew the license was deposited in October, 2013 only and whe...
Tag this Judgment!Ravindra Kumar Singh vs.nisha Dhawan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h December, 2017 RC REV. 557/2017and CM4432444327/2017 RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Mishra, Advocate with... Petitioner in person. versus NISHA DHAWAN & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the eviction petition (E. No.382/2016) instituted by the respondents on the ground of bonafide need under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, the petitioner having been served with the special summons, his application for leave to defend under Section 25-B has been dismissed and an eviction order passed against him by the Additional Rent Controller by order dated 22.07.2017 in respect of tenanted premises described as one room measuring 11.6 ft. x 11 ft. along with open terrace situated at second floor of property No.134, Bhai Parmanand Colony, Delhi-110009.2. 3. The revision petition at hand challenges the said eviction order. The le...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Yadav vs.university of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 12.2017 % + LPA7522017 RAVI YADAV versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR : : Appellant in person Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.42994/2017 (exemption) LPA7522017, 42995/2017 (direction) & 42996/2017 (seeking permission to appear in person) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment dated 20.11.2017, whereby, his writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent University to accept fee from him for the grant of provisional admission in LL.M. First Year for academic session 2017-2018 and a further direction to extend time for submitting documents was rejected. LPA7522017 Page 1 of 7 2. The appellant appeared in the entranc...
Tag this Judgment!Firasat Hussain vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:25. h November, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:08. h December, 2017 + CRL.A. 1388/2013 FIRASAT HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate for Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Vide judgment dated 12th April, 2013, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Rohini (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), held Firasat Hussain - the appellant before us - guilty of committing the murder of his wife Asma, and accordingly convicted him under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC). Consequent thereupon, the learned ASJ sentenced the appellant to rigorous imprisonment for life, vide separate order dated 26th April, 2013. Needless to say, both orders are assailed in the present appeal. Crl.A. 1388/2...
Tag this Judgment!Sarvesh Security Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10931/2017 Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2017 SARVESH SECURITY SERVICE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner . For the Respondent CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) : : Mr. Arjun Mitra, Ms. Aastha Jain, Ms. Sneha Singh and Mr. Rishi Ahuja, Advs. Mr. Amit Bansal, Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs.1. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent. Both the parties submit that the writ petition may be heard and disposed of finally.2. The writ petitioner offers security services and approximately employs about over 1600 personnel as guards. It claims to be providing manpower services to various public sectors and non- Government organizations including the Supreme Court of India, Indian Law Institute, hospitals etc. It responded to an e-tender...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Yunus and Ors. Vs.irctc
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 08, 2017 W.P.(C) 10928/2017 & C.M. 44732/2017 MOHD. YUNUS AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar & Mr. Vibhu, Advocates Versus IRCTC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Advocate JUDGMENT ORAL1 Twenty three petitioners in this petition are aggrieved by Notification of 3rd November, 2017 (Annexure P-1 colly) vide which filling up of vacancies through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) in W-6 (scale `8800-20000) is being undertaken by respondent. Vide impugned Notification of 9th November, 2017 (Annexure P-1 colly) criteria for filling up the vacancies in question has been enlarged.2. The grievance of petitioners herein, who claim to be belonging to North Zone, is that after the advertisement of 3rd November, 2017, the criteria for this examination cannot be modified.3. Learned counsel for respondent points out that this...
Tag this Judgment!