Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prema and Anr. Vs.yogender Singh @ Rahul & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2017
$~R-681 & 682 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12512012 PREMA AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus YOGENDER SINGH @ RAHUL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R3/Sriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. + MAC APPEAL3402013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus PREMA SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. for... RESPONDENTS No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 16th May, 2011, Anjali, a bachelor aged 24 years old, daughter of claimants (Appellants in MAC APP. No.1251/2012 and... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 in MAC APP. No.340/2013), died as a result of injuries suffered, in a motor vehicular accident due to negligent MAC Appeal No.1251/2012 & 340/2013 Page 1 of 4 driving of mini bus bearing registration No.DL1V-A-6685, admitt...
Satish Verma vs.garment Craft (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2017. SATISH VERMA CS(OS) 401/2010 ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Sonia Malhotra & Mr. Shubendu Kaushik, Advs. Versus GARMENT CRAFT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Sudesh Ranjan Singh, Adv. ..... Defendant The plaintiff instituted this suit, for a) specific performance of the 1. Agreement of Sale of July, 2008 of property No.259, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-III, New Delhi; b) in the alternative, i) for recovery of damages in the sum of Rs.3 crores for breach of contract; ii) for refund of Rs.2 crores paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as advance/part sale consideration out of the total agreed price of Rs.11,31,00,000/- together with interest; and, c) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating, encumbering or parting with possession of the said property.2. The suit was entertained and vide ex-parte ad-interim order dated 8th March, 2010...
Shalini Arora vs.surjit Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SHALINI ARORA RFA No.931/2017 Reserved on:1. t December, 2017 Pronounced on:8. h December, 2017 Through: ..... Appellant Rana S. Biswas and Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocates. versus SURJIT SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Gupta, Adv. for R-1 to 6. Mr. Moni Cinmoy, Adv. for R-7. Mr. Jinendra Jain, Adv. for R-8. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.2 in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 13.1.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1 to 6 herein. By the impugned judgment RFA No.931/2017 Page 1 of 16 and decree dated 13.1.2017 trial court has held that respondent nos. 1 to 6/plaintiffs are entitled to declaration that the bid of the appellan...
Sc Johnson Products Private Limited vs.assistant Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
$~ * + W.P.(C) 2697/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 10.2017 Pronounced on:08. 12.2017 SC JOHNSON PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Senior ........ Petitioner Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 22(2), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate + W.P.(C) 10904/2016 & CM No.42721/2016 (stay) SC JOHNSON PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-8, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Dhanesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA W.P.(C) Nos.2697/2015 & 10904/2016 Page 1 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In both these writ petitions, by the assessee, the relief claimed is a direction to quash the reassessment notices issued by the income tax depa...
Rajinder Singh & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h December, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 1460/2016 RAJINDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Nawani, Adv. for R1 and R2. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advs. for L&B/LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners measuring 1 bigha bearing Khasra No.731, Village-Tughlakabad, Delhi bearing property No.107A and 107B respectively (hereinafter referred to as subject land), are deemed to have lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as ne...
Anil Gupta vs.jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 08, 2017 * + W.P.(C) 10930/2017 ANIL GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Advocate Versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY, NEW DELHI AND ........ RESPONDENTS ANR. Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel for JNU & Ms. Vibno Tripthi, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Apoorv Kurup & Mr. Anupam, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER ORAL1... Petitioner claims to be a Statistical Assistant with respondent- University since the year 1992 and in this petition, grant of first upward movement in the scale of `2200-4000 on completion of eight years of service on 22nd January, 2000, is sought claiming parity with the Senior Technical Assistants in terms of E.C. Resolution No.7.15 of 27th September, 1995 and E.C. Resolution No.5.1 of 12th July, 1998 and consequently, upward movement under MACP on completion of ten years of service is also sought by petitioner with all consequential r...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited vs.suriya Anjum & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
$~R-678 & R-679 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h December, 2017 + MAC. APP. 1246/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SURIYA ANJUM & ORS. Through: Nemo. + MAC. APP. 1248/2012 ........ RESPONDENTS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus KRISHNA DEVI & ORS. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. By common judgment dated 08.08.2012, the motor accident claims Tribunal decided two accident claim cases, one (MACT Petition No.147/10), instituted by first to sixth respondents (of MAC APP.1246/2012), hereinafter referred to as the claimants on account of MAC APP.1246/2012 & 1248/2012 Page 1 of 4 death of Parvez Aslam, and the other, (MAC Petition No.146/10), instituted by first to sixth respondents (of MAC APP.1248/2012), hereinafter referred to as the claim...
Harpreet Singh Bhatia vs.north Delhi Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1028/2017 + % HARPREET SINGH BHATIA8h December, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Palak, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J RFA No.1028/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.44569/2017 (for restoration of electricity connection in the premises of the appellant) 1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 25.10.2017 whereby the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction. Appellant/plaintiff by the suit plaint sought the relief against the respondent/defendant against disconnecting the electricity supply by not transferring to the account of the new electricity connection the amount of Rs.4,66,840/- against an old RFA No.1028/2017 Page 1 of 9 electricity...
Saregama India Limited vs.mr Jai Manjit Singh & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
7 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 488/2017 & I.A. 8403/2017 SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Sangal, Advocate with Ms. Pragya Mishra and Mr. Shiva Tokas, Advocates. versus MR JAI MANJIT SINGH & OTHERS Through: Mr. Jugul Kishor Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Ruma Pathak, Advocate for defendants No.2 and 3. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:08. h December, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1.2. No written statement has been filed by the defendants No.2 and 3. Learned counsel for the defendants No.2 and 3 prays for four weeks further time to file a written statement.3. Since more than 120 days have been lapsed, this Court is powerless to extend the time for filing the written statement. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in Oku Tech Private Limited Vs. Sangeet Agarwal & Ors., CS(OS) 3390/2015 has held as under:-"CS(COMM) 488/2017 Page 1 of 4 8. The amendments to the CPC brought out by the Schedule to the Act se...
Sukanta Roy Chaudhary vs.agriculture Insurance Co. Of India Ltd. And O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 08, 2017 * + W.P.(C) 10912/2017 & C.M. 44667-68/2017 1. SUKANTA ROY CHAUDHARY Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus AGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO. OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, Advocates for respondent No.1 & 3 Mr. Vikram Jetley, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL... Petitioners email of 10th October, 2017 (Annexure P-4) has been responded to by the first respondent vide impugned e-mail of 26th October, 2017 (Annexure P-6).... Petitioner claims to be working with first respondent as Manager, Actuary since 15th March, 2015 and in November, 2015, he was removed from the Actuary Department and was given responsibility of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) & Compliance Department.2. Third respondent, vide advertisement of 10th June, 2017 had invited applications for appointment on the post of Appointed Actuary and pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »