Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 112 of about 1,333 results (0.023 seconds)Ajay Pal Singh Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 10.2014 Pronounced on:11. 11.2014 + W.P.(C) 8888/2009 AJAY PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner, in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions orders dated 19.03.2009 and 02.09.2006 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter the CAT), in R.A. No.130/2007 and O.A. No.144/2005 respectively which denied ad-hoc out of turn promotion to him. The CAT reasoned that promotion is not a matter of right and that the competent authority rejected the petitioners request upon due consideration.2. The relevant facts of this case are that the petitioner joined the Delhi Police as Sub-Inspector (Exe) in 1985 in the sports quota. From the time of his appointment, he particip...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Ravi Kumar Tyagi and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 28, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 11, 2014 CRL.A. 1564/2013 % + PARDEEP KHATRI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Bharat Sharma and Mr.Javed Alvi, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Sunil Kumar Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha, Advocate for complainant CRL.A. 1660/2013 SMT CHELA DEVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Kr.Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha and Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Malik, Mr.C.L.Sharma and Mr.Navinder Chaudhary, Advocates for Ravi Tyagi CRL.A. 1000/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State versus RAVI KUMAR TYAGI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Ma...
Tag this Judgment!Uco Bank Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 3563/2012 & CM No.7517/2012 UCO BANK ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 2714/2014 & CM563334/2014 UCO BANK ..... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Prem Lata Bansal with Mr Sarfaraz Khan. For the Respondents : Mr N.P. Sahni. Mr Anuj Aggarwal with Mr Gaurav Khanna UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The writ petition (W.P.(C) No.3563/2012) has been filed challenging a notice dated 25.04.2012 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (hereafter ACIT) whereby the petitioner bank was directed to submit the details of deposits made with the petitioner bank by all litigants in the name of Registrar General of this Court during the Financial Years 2005-06 to 2010-11. The petitioner bank al...
Tag this Judgment!Madhavsinh Solanki Vs. State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: October 16, 2014 Decided on: November 11, 2014 CRL.A. No.610 of 2008 MADHAVSINH SOLANKI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Hamid Kureshi, Ms. Sima Gulati, Ms. Shikha Pandey, Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Ms. Aakanksha Nehra and Mr. Aritra Roy, Advocates. versus STATE THR. CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Naveen Mata, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Akash Nagar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1111.2014 Introduction 1. This appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr PC) against an order dated 7th July 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge (CBI), Delhi in RC No.1(A)/90/CBI/ACU-IV whereby a direction was issued that a complaint be filed against the Appellant under Section 193 IPC before the Court of competent jurisdiction.2. The Appellant was a Minister of External Affairs in the Government of India. On 1st February 1992 during his visit to Davos, Switzerland to attend the annual World...
Tag this Judgment!Pardeep Khatri Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 28, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 11, 2014 CRL.A. 1564/2013 % + PARDEEP KHATRI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Bharat Sharma and Mr.Javed Alvi, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Sunil Kumar Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha, Advocate for complainant CRL.A. 1660/2013 SMT CHELA DEVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Kr.Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha and Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Malik, Mr.C.L.Sharma and Mr.Navinder Chaudhary, Advocates for Ravi Tyagi CRL.A. 1000/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State versus RAVI KUMAR TYAGI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Ma...
Tag this Judgment!Uco Bank Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 3563/2012 & CM No.7517/2012 UCO BANK ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 2714/2014 & CM563334/2014 UCO BANK ..... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Prem Lata Bansal with Mr Sarfaraz Khan. For the Respondents : Mr N.P. Sahni. Mr Anuj Aggarwal with Mr Gaurav Khanna UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The writ petition (W.P.(C) No.3563/2012) has been filed challenging a notice dated 25.04.2012 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (hereafter ACIT) whereby the petitioner bank was directed to submit the details of deposits made with the petitioner bank by all litigants in the name of Registrar General of this Court during the Financial Years 2005-06 to 2010-11. The petitioner bank al...
Tag this Judgment!Ritu Kushwaha and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:28. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 % + W.P.(C) 7808/2012 & C.M. No.19651/2012 RITU KUSHWAHA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mrs. Rekha Palli and Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC along with Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Mr. S.S. Rai, Mr. Rohan Gupta, Mr. A.N. Singh and Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 29.10.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.3949/2011, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the aforesaid application. The said Original Application had been preferred to seek regularization of the services of the petitioners with effect from the date they completed ten years of serv...
Tag this Judgment!Poonam Bhatia and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6233/2014 & CM150802014 POONAM BHATIA & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi. For the Respondents : Mr Vikas Mahajan for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) ...
Tag this Judgment!The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-iv Vs. M/S Industrial Finance Co ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.127/2002 Reserved on : Date of decision:24. h September, 2014 11th November, 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus M/S INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Ms. Kavita Jha & Mr. Vivek Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This appeal by the Revenue, which relates to Assessment Year 198687, stands admitted for adjudication on the following substantial questions of law:1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was correct in law in allowing the deduction u/s 80M & 80K without reducing from the dividend income, the deduction as admissible u/s 36(1)(viii) of the Act?.2. Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing the deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of the Act to the extent of 40% of the income ...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. A.S.Divyender
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:14. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 % W.P.(C) 3923/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.P. Khuruna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate versus A.S. DIVYENDER Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. W.P.(C) 3924/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.P. Khuruna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate versus SH. G.S.V.S. PRABHAKAR RAO Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petitions have been preferred by National Highways Authority Of India (NHAI/ petitioner authority) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the common order dated 06.03.2012 passed in OA No.3280/2011 & OA No.3281/2011 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal), whereby the ...
Tag this Judgment!