Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
K.K. Modi and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
$~37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6506/2014 & CM No.15539/2014 K.K. MODI & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Aditya Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Ajay Digpaul, Advocate for R-1 Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-2 Mr Yeeshu Jain, Advocate with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R-3 Ms Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate with Mr Ajay Kalra and Mr Abhai Vohra, Advocates for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proce...
Tag this Judgment!National Highways Authority of India Vs. Sh. G.S.V.S.Prabhakar Rao
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:14. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 % W.P.(C) 3923/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.P. Khuruna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate versus A.S. DIVYENDER Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. W.P.(C) 3924/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. P.P. Khuruna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate versus SH. G.S.V.S. PRABHAKAR RAO Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petitions have been preferred by National Highways Authority Of India (NHAI/ petitioner authority) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the common order dated 06.03.2012 passed in OA No.3280/2011 & OA No.3281/2011 by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal), whereby the ...
Tag this Judgment!Prashid Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6316/2014 & CM152472014 PRASHID ESTATE PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi. For the Respondents : Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC with Ms Indu Prabha and Mr Deepak Gupta for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B. Mr Pawan Mathur and Mr Himanshu Gupta for DDA. . CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Madan Mohan Sharma Vs. Min. of Health and Fw
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:10. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6908/2014 and C.M. No.16286/2014 MADAN MOHAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus MIN. OF HEALTH & FW Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC along with Mr. Amit Kishore Sinha & Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 31.07.2014 in T.A. No.36/2013 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the CAT held that the Office Order dated 31.12.1993 bearing No.B-12014/7/92CGHS(P), insofar as it relates to exclusion of the healthy dependant sons of the Government Servant (such as the petitioner) from coverage under the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) was not disc...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar and Sons (Huf) Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5075/2014 VINOD KUMAR & SONS (HUF) ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Anand Yadav and Ms Anita Tomar. For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which Award No.24/05-06 dated 03.02.20...
Tag this Judgment!Shashi Jai Krishna Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
$~48(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4354/2014 SHASHI JAI KRISHNA .... Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Satyavan Kudalwal For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Siddharth Panda /L&B and LAC. Mr Pawan Mathur for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector, states that the counter-affidavit has been filed vide diary No.211917 on 07.11.2014. The same is not on record. He has, however, given a copy of the said affidavit. The Registry is directed to place that counter-affidavit on record. The copy is also taken on record.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1, New Delhi Vs. Shailendra Mahto
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.127/2012 Reserved on :1. t August, 2014 Date of decision:11. h November, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roychaudhury & Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates. versus SHAILENDRA MAHTO ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Burman & Mr. Aditya Swarup, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.128/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, NEW DELHI ...... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roychaudhury & Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates. versus SIMON MARANDI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashok Sikka, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.131/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roychaudhury & Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates. versus JHARKHAND MUKTI MORCHA ..... Respondent Through Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ram Avtar Bansal & Mr. Naman Nayak, Advocates. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.133/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,...
Tag this Judgment!Rajiv Purusothaman Kutty and Other Vs. M/S Religare Finvest Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A.No.20176/2014 in O.M.P. 1253/2014 Judgment reserved on:07. 11.2014 Judgment pronounced on:11. 11.2014 RAJIV PURUSOTHAMAN KUTTY & OTHER Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.P.Dhamija and Mr.Sarad Singhania, Advocates versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Uppal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT I.A.No.20176/2014 (for delay in filing) 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioners for condonation of delay of 14 days in filing the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is submitted that the ex-parte award in this case was passed on 18.06.2014. The petitioners came to know about the award from the respondents office at Mumbai and had rushed to Delhi and obtained certified copy by depositing the learned arbitrators fee of Rs.5500/- on 25.09.2014. It is submitted that the present petition was filed on 30...
Tag this Judgment!Sukhveer Singh Vs. Hoshiyar Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 447/2012 SUKHVEER SINGH Through ..... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus HOSHIYAR SINGH & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. R.C. Mahajan, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant who was the claimant before the Tribunal seeking enhancement of the compensation as awarded by the Tribunal vide award dated 14.10.2011.2. The appellant filed the claim petition under Sections 140/166 of the MV Act, 1988.3. On 05.08.2009, after completing his duty, the appellant was returning to his house on his motorcycle. While passing through the railway flyover Meet Nagar on Wazirabad Road, appellants vehicle was hit by a Maruti Esteem car. The said vehicle was driven in a rash and negligent manner. The appellant fell down on the road and sustained multiple injuries. He suffered multiple fractures on his right leg from the thigh...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3844/2014 ANIL KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Radhey Shyam, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Aditya PS Tilak Nagar. Complainant in person with Mr.Munish, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.257/2009 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Tilak Nagar on 11th November, 2009 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Munish, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.3. Petitioners as well as respondent No.2-Monika are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer/SI Aditya, Po...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- Next ›
- Last »