Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 111 of about 1,333 results (0.024 seconds)Beant Singh Vs. Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.193/2013 12th November, 2014 % BEANT SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.S. Uppal, Advocate. Versus COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Banati, Advocate with Ms. Deeksha Rao, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court/Additional District Judge dated 19.9.2012 by which the trial court dismissed the application of the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. By the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, petitioner/plaintiff prayed that the suit for recovery of possession of the tenanted/licenced premises being ground floor of the property bearing no.B60, G.T. Karnal Road, Industrial Area, Delhi-110033 be decreed.3. In Delhi, the suits for possession have to be decreed where ther...
Tag this Judgment!Akbar Khan and ors Vs. Akbar Khan and ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-44. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 826/2012 URMILA TYAGI & ORS Through ..... Appellant Mr. Subhash Kamboj, Advocate versus AKBAR KHAN & ORS Through ..... Respondent Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 12.04.2012. The brief facts leading to filing of the claim petition by the appellants are that on 15.12.2005, the deceased Vijender Kumar Tyagi was going with Mr. Rinku i.e.Nitin Tyagi in a Maruti Zen Car. Near Akrabad Petrol Pump they were hit by a truck said to be driven rashly and negligently by respondent No.1. The occupants of the car were grievously injured. Later on, Mr. Vijender Kumar Tyagi succumbed to his injuries.2. On the issue of negligence of respondent No.1, the driver of the offending truck, the tribunal noted the evidence of PW2 Mr. Nitin Tyagi who was an eye witness. The tribunal also noted abo...
Tag this Judgment!Dhruv Dev Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h November, 2014 + LA.APP. 159/2014 DHRUV DEV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) C.M. No.13496/2014 (u/O9Rule 9 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Restoration of the accompanying appeal is sought by this application as it was dismissed in default on 17th July, 2014. The reasons stated in paragraphs No.6 to 9 of the instant application provide sufficient cause to allow this application and it is therefore allowed and the accompanying appeal is restored to its original position. Application is disposed of. C.M. No.4790/2014 (Condonation of delay) & LA.APP No.159/2014 The delay in filing the accompanying appeal is of about three years. LA.APP No.159/2014 Page 1 A vain effort is made by appellants counsel to explain the inordinate delay by assertin...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Pandey and ors Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3805/2014 Decided on :12. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF SANJAY PANDEY & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Advocate versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ..... Respondent Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Sinha, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for quashing the order dated 12.11.2013, passed by the respondent/CBDT, declining to promote them w.e.f. 23.9.2010, the date when the DPC was held.2. On 24.9.2014, it was recorded that the petitioners, who were working on the post of Additional Commissioners of Income Tax, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, have a grievance that the respondent/CBDT has violated the order dated 6.7.2012 passed by the Division Bench in a batch of writ petitions filed by them, including WP(C)No.8017/2010 filed against the order dated 2.11.2010 passed by the Central Administrative T...
Tag this Judgment!Sneh Lata Vs. Ashok Kumar Dhull
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h November, 2014 + MAT. APP. No.97/2007 SNEH LATA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.P.Sharma & Mr. Shivendu Kaushik, Advocates versus ASHOK KUMAR DHULL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Ms. Anupriya Singh & Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Appellant is the wife, who assails impugned judgment of 7th September, 2007 vide which respondent-husband has been granted divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The factual matrix of this case has already been spelt out in the opening paragraph of the impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. Suffice it would be to note that parties were married on 8 th June, 1980 in Delhi and of the three children born out of this wedlock, unfortunately one son expired on 4th June, 2000, thus, the parties presently have one living daughter and one son. Appellant is a primary teacher in MCD and respondent is also a teacher. According t...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Prakash Kaur Chadha and ors. Vs. Smt. Sudesh Mehta and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.1305/2011 12th November, 2014 % SMT. PRAKASH KAUR CHADHA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Arun Batta, Advocate. versus SMT. SUDESH MEHTA & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr.Anil Kher, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kunal Kher and Mr.Ankur Gosain, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioners/landlords impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dated 10.8.2011 by which the Additional Rent Control Tribunal/first appellate court has set aside the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller/Original Court dated 12.8.2008, and dismissed the eviction petition filed by the present petitioners on the ground of subletting under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). CM(M) No.1305/2011 page 1 of 15 2. The tenante...
Tag this Judgment!Urmila Tyagi and ors Vs. Akbar Khan and ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-44. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 826/2012 URMILA TYAGI & ORS Through ..... Appellant Mr. Subhash Kamboj, Advocate versus AKBAR KHAN & ORS Through ..... Respondent Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 12.04.2012. The brief facts leading to filing of the claim petition by the appellants are that on 15.12.2005, the deceased Vijender Kumar Tyagi was going with Mr. Rinku i.e.Nitin Tyagi in a Maruti Zen Car. Near Akrabad Petrol Pump they were hit by a truck said to be driven rashly and negligently by respondent No.1. The occupants of the car were grievously injured. Later on, Mr. Vijender Kumar Tyagi succumbed to his injuries.2. On the issue of negligence of respondent No.1, the driver of the offending truck, the tribunal noted the evidence of PW2 Mr. Nitin Tyagi who was an eye witness. The tribunal also noted abo...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd Vs. Joginder Kaur and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ R-1A, R-1B & R-1C. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:12. 11.2014 + + MACA7192005 & CM121632005 MACA7222005 & CM122242005 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus JOGINDER KAUR & ORS Through + .... Respondents Mrs. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate MACA8462013 SMT. JOGINDER KAUR ALIAS RAJ KAUR THR LRS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mrs. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) MACA7192005 & CM121632005 MACA7222005 & CM122242005 1. These two appeals are filed by the appellant insurance company seeking to impugn the Award passed by the tribunal dated 21.05.2005.2. The basic facts are that on 07.12.1979, Sardar Balwant Singh along with his wife Joginder Kaur had boarded three wheeler scooter at Nizamuddin, Delhi. They were going to Dr. Behls clinic at Greater KailashI. The driver of the said scoote...
Tag this Judgment!Bhairo Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 07, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 11, 2014 % + CRL.A. 402/2013 BHAIRO SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Sushil Kumar and Insp.Dharmender Kumar, SHO PS Krishna Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Bhairo Singh is convicted for the kidnapping and murder of Lakshay, a five year old child and the destruction of evidence, vide the impugned judgment dated January 29, 2013 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of `2,000/-for offence punishable under Section 364 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 years and a fine of `1,000/- for offence puni...
Tag this Judgment!Smt.Chela Devi Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 28, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 11, 2014 CRL.A. 1564/2013 % + PARDEEP KHATRI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Bharat Sharma and Mr.Javed Alvi, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Sunil Kumar Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha, Advocate for complainant CRL.A. 1660/2013 SMT CHELA DEVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Kr.Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Ravinder Chadha and Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Malik, Mr.C.L.Sharma and Mr.Navinder Chaudhary, Advocates for Ravi Tyagi CRL.A. 1000/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State versus RAVI KUMAR TYAGI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pardeep Kumar Arya, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Ma...
Tag this Judgment!