Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Kuldeep Singh & Anr Vs. State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3440/2014 & CRL.M.A. 11904/2014 KULDEEP SINGH & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sarfaraz Hussain, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State R-2 in person Mr. Gautam Gupta, Adv. for R-3 with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Branch Manager, UBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 12.11.2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.22/2011 registered on 17.02.2011 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC at Police Station Lodhi Colony, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Gautam Gupta, Advocate for the third respondent, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant, Geeta Tripathi, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 herein, is present in person.4. The aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the instance of the complainant alleging unauthori...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Shiv Kumari & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Date of decision:12. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 655/2011 and CM No.13285/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate versus SHIV KUMARI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to 6 Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. for R-7 & 8 MAC.APP. 106/2012 SHIV KUMARI & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By this order I will dispose off two appeals. MAC Appeal No.655/2011 is filed by the insurance company seeking to impugn the Award dated 9 th March, 201.1 MAC Appeal No.106/2012 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation as granted by the Award dated 9th March, 2011.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the claim petition under Section 166/140 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 are that on 14th June, 2010 at...
Tag this Judgment!Murari Vs. Shankar Lal and Sh. Suresh Bharadwaj (Prop./Partne
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1952013 Decided on 12th November, 2014 MURARI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. D.K. Pandey, Adv. versus SHANKAR LAL AND SH. SURESH BHARADWAJ (PROP./PARTNER) ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Arguments heard. Trial court record perused.2. Appellant filed a petition under Section 10 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act, for short) before the Commissioner, seeking compensation from the respondent in respect of the permanent disability suffered by him in his eye on account of the alleged injuries suffered at the work place in an accident. The claim petition has been dismissed by the Commissioner by the order impugned in this appeal.3. Appellant alleged that he was employed with the respondent as a Karigar with effect from 2009 on a monthly wages of `6,500/-. Appellant was not provided various legal facilities, such as, appointment letter, leave encashm...
Tag this Judgment!Alankar Rajput & Anr Vs. State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5071/2014 ALANKAR RAJPUT & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. R. R. Malik, Advocate with R2 in person. ASI Hansraj. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.17359/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5071/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.70/2011 registered under Section 324, 34 IPC at police station Hazrat Nizamuddin, on 21.03.2011, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. R. R. Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent / complainant is also identi...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Jagtar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 12, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 5/2010 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Sanjeev Kr.P.S. S.P.Badli versus JAGTAR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Payal Juneja, Advocate CRL.A. 321/2013 GIAN CHAND Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Payal Juneja, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Sanjeev Kumar, SHO P.S.S.P.Badli CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Five persons : (i) Jagtar Singh (A-1), (ii) Sheela @ Chabili (A-2), (iii) Jitender @ Nanu, (iv) Gian Chand and (v) Ashok Kumar @ Ganja were charged for having entered into a conspiracy to murder Bimla, Lakha and Bindeshwar Yadav. They were further charged of giving effect to the conspiracy by causing the death of the said persons. They were further charged of intending to...
Tag this Judgment!Urmila Tyagi and Ors Vs. Akbar Khan and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~A-44. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 826/2012 URMILA TYAGI & ORS Through ..... Appellant Mr. Subhash Kamboj, Advocate versus AKBAR KHAN & ORS Through ..... Respondent Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 12.04.2012. The brief facts leading to filing of the claim petition by the appellants are that on 15.12.2005, the deceased Vijender Kumar Tyagi was going with Mr. Rinku i.e.Nitin Tyagi in a Maruti Zen Car. Near Akrabad Petrol Pump they were hit by a truck said to be driven rashly and negligently by respondent No.1. The occupants of the car were grievously injured. Later on, Mr. Vijender Kumar Tyagi succumbed to his injuries.2. On the issue of negligence of respondent No.1, the driver of the offending truck, the tribunal noted the evidence of PW2 Mr. Nitin Tyagi who was an eye witness. The tribunal also noted abo...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Shiv Kumari and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + Date of decision:12. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 655/2011 and CM No.13285/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate versus SHIV KUMARI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to 6 Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. for R-7 & 8 MAC.APP. 106/2012 SHIV KUMARI & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By this order I will dispose off two appeals. MAC Appeal No.655/2011 is filed by the insurance company seeking to impugn the Award dated 9 th March, 201.1 MAC Appeal No.106/2012 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation as granted by the Award dated 9th March, 2011.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the claim petition under Section 166/140 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 are that on 14th June, 2010 at...
Tag this Judgment!M/S India Infoline Ltd and Anr Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5084/2014 M/S INDIA INFOLINE LTD & ANR Through Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocate. ..... Petitioners versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Inspector Satish Kumar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. Nos.17400/2014 & 17401/2014 Exemptions, as prayed, are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. These applications are disposed off. Crl.M.C. 5084/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.122/2011 registered under Sections 406, 120-B, 34 IPC at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, on 27.06.2011, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, enters appearance and accepts notice. The complainant Babu Lal Rustagi, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 herein, is present in person, and...
Tag this Judgment!M/S India Infoline Ltd and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5084/2014 M/S INDIA INFOLINE LTD & ANR Through Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocate. ..... Petitioners versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Inspector Satish Kumar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. Nos.17400/2014 & 17401/2014 Exemptions, as prayed, are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. These applications are disposed off. Crl.M.C. 5084/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.122/2011 registered under Sections 406, 120-B, 34 IPC at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, on 27.06.2011, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, enters appearance and accepts notice. The complainant Babu Lal Rustagi, who is arrayed as respondent No.2 herein, is present in person, and...
Tag this Judgment!Murari Vs. Shankar Lal and Sh. Suresh Bharadwaj (Prop./Partne
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1952013 Decided on 12th November, 2014 MURARI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. D.K. Pandey, Adv. versus SHANKAR LAL AND SH. SURESH BHARADWAJ (PROP./PARTNER) ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Arguments heard. Trial court record perused.2. Appellant filed a petition under Section 10 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act, for short) before the Commissioner, seeking compensation from the respondent in respect of the permanent disability suffered by him in his eye on account of the alleged injuries suffered at the work place in an accident. The claim petition has been dismissed by the Commissioner by the order impugned in this appeal.3. Appellant alleged that he was employed with the respondent as a Karigar with effect from 2009 on a monthly wages of `6,500/-. Appellant was not provided various legal facilities, such as, appointment letter, leave encashm...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- Next ›
- Last »