Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 107 of about 1,333 results (0.041 seconds)Prabha Goel Vs. Nirmal Kumari JaIn and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.No.462/2011 12th November, 2014 % PRABHA GOEL Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate. VERSUS NIRMAL KUMARI JAIN AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobha, Advocate with Mr. Akanksha Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.(M) No.20967/2011 1. This is an application for filing additional evidence/documents. This application has to be dismissed for the simple reason that Supreme Court in the judgment in the case of Prithipal Singh Vs. Satpal Singh (dead) through LRs. (2010) 2 SCC15has held that whatever a tenant has to state and file for seeking leave to defend is to be done within the 15 days statutory period and after the 15 days statutory period, condonation of delay of even one day is not possible. Effectively, therefore the Supreme Court holds that the statutory period of 15 days is sacrosanct and within which period a...
Tag this Judgment!Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson(publ) Vs. Mercury Electronics & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~ 21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 442/2013 % Judgment dated 12.11.2014 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON(PUBL)..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Mr.B. Prashant Kumar and Mr.Saurabh Anand, Advs. versus MERCURY ELECTRONICS & ANR ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Sunil Dalal, Mr.Rajiv K. Choudhary and Ms.Rachel Mamatha and Ms.Savni Dutt, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 3825/2013 (STAY) & I.A. 4694/2013 (O39R4= By D-2) 1. Subsequent to the last order dated, 14.10.2014, the parties have appeared and made submissions. Ericsson, as per the directions of the court and upon being asked by the court has produced 26 license agreements. Micromax has asked for agreements/offers by Ericsson with other Indian parties. After hearing submissions and perusing the rates which were contained therein, the court directs as follows:2. The Defendants shall ...
Tag this Judgment!Mohit Bansal Vs. State N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :30. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on :12. 11.2014 Crl. M.A. No.1117/2014 in Crl. Appeal No.828/2009 MOHIT BANSAL Through ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This is an application filed under Sections 4 & 6 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) seeking probation in terms of the conviction which has been upheld against the applicant by a Bench of this Court. 2 The averments contained in the application have been perused. It is stated that the applicant is enrolled as a chartered accountant with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. He had been convicted by the Sessions Judge under Section 376 (2)(g) as also under...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co. Ltd Vs. Joginder Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~ R-1A, R-1B & R-1C. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:12. 11.2014 + + MACA7192005 & CM121632005 MACA7222005 & CM122242005 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus JOGINDER KAUR & ORS Through + .... Respondents Mrs. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate MACA8462013 SMT. JOGINDER KAUR ALIAS RAJ KAUR THR LRS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mrs. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) MACA7192005 & CM121632005 MACA7222005 & CM122242005 1. These two appeals are filed by the appellant insurance company seeking to impugn the Award passed by the tribunal dated 21.05.2005.2. The basic facts are that on 07.12.1979, Sardar Balwant Singh along with his wife Joginder Kaur had boarded three wheeler scooter at Nizamuddin, Delhi. They were going to Dr. Behls clinic at Greater KailashI. The driver of the said scoote...
Tag this Judgment!Ms. Piyali Das Gupta Vs. Sh Shantanu Das Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 12, 2014 + CRP222014 MS. PIYALI DAS GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Advocate Versus SH SHANTANU DAS GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Jaya Tomar, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Vide impugned order of 18th January, 2014 petitioners application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC stands dismissed in proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. Rejection of the respondents petition under Section 7 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act was sought on the ground of the lack of territorial jurisdiction while relying upon Section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act. At the hearing of this petition, learned counsel for petitioner had drawn the attention of this Court to Section 9 of the Guardian and Wards Act and had submitted that the Court within whose jurisdiction a minor child ordinarily resides can deal with such an application and in the insta...
Tag this Judgment!Uma Kumari Vs. the Chairman Managing Committee, Air Force School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
* s + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5675/2013 Decided on:12. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : UMA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.P. Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate versus THE CHAIRMAN MANAGING COMMITTEE, AIR FORCE SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rekha Palli, Advocate with Ms. Garima Sachdeva and Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advocates for R-1/School. Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for R-2/CBSE. Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for R-4. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia that the appointment of the respondent No.4 be declared as bad in law and her appointment to the post of TGT (Hindi) be quashed.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the IAF Educational and Cultural Society had issued an advertisement dated 31.01.2012 for recruitment of teaching and administrative staff, including the appointment of teachers to the post of TGT (Hindi), which is the sub...
Tag this Judgment!Mitsui Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kt Holidays Private Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3322014 Decided on 12th November, 2014 MITSUI CHEMICALS INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Silwal, Mr. Vikas Dutta and Mr. Nikhil Varshney, Advs. versus KT HOLIDAYS PRIVATE LTD & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) Caveat 950/2014 Since caveator has appeared caveat is discharged. FAO3322014 1. Appellant hired three cars from the respondents pursuant to separate contracts. One of the hired cars was Toyota Camry bearing registration No.DL-1ZZ0164 which was hired by the appellant for a period of three years vide agreement dated 15th November, 2006. Respondents claimed that Toyota Camry car was purchased by the respondents at the request of appellant and was lent on hire. The other two cars, that is, Honda Accord bearing registration No.DL3CAK7431and Toyota Innova bearing registration No.DL3F9333were also hired by the appellant vide separate...
Tag this Judgment!Attar Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2107/2014 ATTAR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Arya with Mr. Narinder Chaudhary and Mr. Praveen Dabas, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State. BAIL APPLN. 2108/2014 VIDYA DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Arya with Mr. Narinder Chaudhary and Mr. Praveen Dabas, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) These two applications filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) on behalf of the applicants who seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.247/2014 under Sections 302/34 IPC registered at P.S. Kanjhawala, Delhi. Since both these applications are arising out of the same FIR, these are being taken up together for disposal. Learned counsel for the applicants subm...
Tag this Judgment!Gian Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 12, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 5/2010 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Sanjeev Kr.P.S. S.P.Badli versus JAGTAR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Payal Juneja, Advocate CRL.A. 321/2013 GIAN CHAND Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Payal Juneja, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Sanjeev Kumar, SHO P.S.S.P.Badli CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Five persons : (i) Jagtar Singh (A-1), (ii) Sheela @ Chabili (A-2), (iii) Jitender @ Nanu, (iv) Gian Chand and (v) Ashok Kumar @ Ganja were charged for having entered into a conspiracy to murder Bimla, Lakha and Bindeshwar Yadav. They were further charged of giving effect to the conspiracy by causing the death of the said persons. They were further charged of intending to...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Anita Gupta & Ors Vs. Shri Narender Kumar Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 632/2009 SMT. ANITA GUPTA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus SHRI NARENDER KUMAR GUPTA & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL % 1. ORDER1211.2014 This suit for partition and rendition of accounts has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in respect of property No.6404, gali no.4, Dev Nagar, near Kikarwala Chowk, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The property was earlier owned by Sh. Ranjit Singh Gupta. On partition of the property, 50 percent share measuring about 85 sq. yards of property No.6404, gali no.4, Dev Nagar, near Kikarwala Chowk, Karol Bagh, New Delhi came to the share of Shri Kishan Gupta, father of the parties. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that that Plaintiffs are not pressing for the proof of rendition of accounts. He urges that a preliminary decree for partition in respect of 1/7th share of the suit property i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- Next ›
- Last »