Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 115 of about 1,333 results (0.022 seconds)Anjali Vs. Raja
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. h November, 2014 + MAT.APP.86/2010 ANJALI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Lalji Kumar, Advocate versus RAJA Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Anshu Priyanka, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Appellants petition for declaring her marriage with respondent a nullity has been dismissed by trial court vide impugned judgment of 31st March, 2010 while holding as under:Moreover from the photographs Ex.RW1/2 to Ex.RW1/9, it does not appear that petitioner was not in her senses at the time of her marriage or that she was under influence of some kind of intoxicant. Further the events which followed the alleged solemnization of marriage also create doubt regarding the case put forth by the petitioner. Even assuming petitioner and her parents came to know of the alleged marriage on 15.04.2008, though from above discussion, it is apparent that concealment, if any, about the marriage was by the petitioner herself, eve...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Suresh Chand Sharma and anr. Vs. Smt. Sushila Devi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. No.160/2014 11th November, 2014 % SH. SURESH CHAND SHARMA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Advocate. versus SMT. SUSHILA DEVI ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.18401/2014 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. + C.R.P. No.160/2014 and C.M. No.18402/2014 (stay) 2. Sitting in this jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), I find that considerable number of petitions; the present petition being one such petition; are filed in absolutely meritless cases. By the impugned order dated 11.9.2014, an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed by the trial court in a suit for possession, permanent injunction, damages etc observing that issues raised in the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC are issues of defence and such ...
Tag this Judgment!Future Generali India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Kunji Lal and ors
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 702/2012 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..... Appellant Through Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr. Pankaj Gupta and Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Advocates versus KUNJI LAL & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant insurance company to impugn the Award dated 7.5.2012. The brief facts are that respondent No.1 was on 7.12.2011 going towards Shahbad Dairy in a Gramin Seva. The Gramin Seva turned upside down due to which the respondent No.1 sustained injuries. Based on the evidence on record, the tribunal granted a total compensation of Rs.20,84,934/- to respondent No.1.2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that there is violation of the insurance policy. The driver and the owner are being prosecuted for driving a vehicle and causing an accident for which they were not authorise...
Tag this Judgment!Surender Pal Vs. High Court of Delhi Through the Registrar General
Court: Delhi
26. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:11. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7718/2014 and CM APPL.Nos. 18152-18153/2014 SURENDER PAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit George & Ms. Rajasree Ajay, Advocates. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Anu Bagai, Advocate for respondent No.1/DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction for quashing the merit list and the appointments to the post of Private Secretary, made in 2006.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner competed for the post of Private Secretary pursuant to an advertisement issued on 24.02.2006. advertisement, inter alia, stated as follows: The Mode of Selection Selection shall be made on the basis of written examination comprising one paper in English language (Essay, Grammar and Translation) to be held on Sunday, 30th April 2006. Successful candidates ...
Tag this Judgment!Harvest Securities Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bp Singapore Pvt. Ltd and an ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:11. h November, 2014. + CS(OS) No.103/2013, Counter Claim No.29/2013 & IAs No.14636/2013 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 16579/2013 (u/O XI R-1 CPC) HARVEST SECURITIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Avi Singh and Mr. Subhiksh, Adv. Versus BP SINGAPORE PVT. LTD & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ananya Kumar & Ms. Pragya Chauhan, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit pleading:(i) that the plaintiff no.2 Shri Rohit Vedhara was posted in the India-based office of the defendant no.1 i.e. with the defendant no.2 BP India Services Private Limited and the plaintiff no.2 himself is the Managing Director of the plaintiff no.1 which, relying on the experience and goodwill of the plaintiff no.2, is carrying on business of providing consulting services for oil and gas industry; (ii) that the defendant no.1 is a company incorporated under t...
Tag this Judgment!Kartar Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :03. 11 .2014 Pronounced on :11. .11.2014 % + CRL.A. 870/2009 KARTAR SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Amardeep Singh, Mr.M.L.Yadav, Mr.Baljinder Singh, Mr.Bhagwant Singh and Mr.Mansimran Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J1 This is an appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the Appellant impugning the judgment dated 07.09.2009 and order on sentence dated 09.09.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the Appellant was convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs.5,000/- for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. The Appellant was further convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.1,000/- for committing the offence punishable under Section 506 IPC in case FIR No.391/2001, Sessions Case No...
Tag this Judgment!Ms. Yusra Hashmi Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.735/2014 MS. YUSRA HASHMI Through: .. Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini with Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Salman Hashmi & Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Ms. Y. Phazang, Adv. for Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Advs. for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 13th October, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.6570/2014 preferred by the appellant.2. We have heard the counsel for the appellant in detail on the aspect of entertaining this appeal.3. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was filed impugning the order dated 11th September, 2014 of the Vice Chancellor of the respondent No.1 University of Delhi rejecting the representation of the appellant / writ petitioner for condoning the delay of one day in seeking admission to...
Tag this Judgment!Uoi and anr. Vs. Bahgwan Shahai and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2314/2011 & CM. Nos. 4947/2011 and 4948/2011 UOI AND ANR. Represented by: Versus BAHGWAN SHAHAI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Jayendra, Advocate. ..... Respondents Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 2315/2011 UOI AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. Jayendra, Advocate. Versus MAHAVIR SINGH AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 2830/2011 & CM. Nos. 6013/2011 and 15009/2013 UOI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jayendra, Advocate. Versus JITENDER W.P (C) No.2314/2011 Represented by: Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 7002/2011 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Saqib, Advocate. Versus AMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Sumit Kumar and ors. Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5061/2014 SUMIT KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. B.S. Choudhary, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Yodram Yadav, PS Khayala. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.17316/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5061/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.262/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Khyala on 26th October, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as comp...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Gyano Devi Vs. Smt. Kanchan Chopra and anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.M.(M) Nos. 1095/2012 & C.R.P. No.140/2012 03rd November, 2014 % 1. C.M.(M) No.1095/2012 SMT. GYANO DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Advocate with Mr. K.K. Gautam, Advocate. versus SMT. KANCHAN CHOPRA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sam Dutta Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Pawar Singh, Advocate.2. C. R.P. No.140/2012 SMT. GYANO DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Advocate with Mr. K.K. Gautam, Advocate. versus SMT. KANCHAN CHOPRA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sam Dutta Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Pawar Singh, Advocate. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.(M) No.1095/2012 and C.M.Nos.17283-84/2012 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 10.2.2011 and the first appellate court dated 9.8.2011; by which the application of the petitioner/...
Tag this Judgment!