Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 116 of about 1,333 results (0.023 seconds)Baljeet Singh and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5040/2014 BALJEET SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP with SI Ram Mehar Singh, PS Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. G.S. Aneja, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.17278/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5040/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.136/2013 registered on 20.4.2013 under Sections 341/448/380/34 IPC at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr.G.S. Aneja, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Suraj Prakash and ors. Vs. Ms. Nadra Begum
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. No.296/2013 & CM Nos. 12383-84/2013 11th November , 2014 % SHRI SURAJ PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate. VERSUS MS. NADRA BEGUM Through: ...... Respondent Mr. R.M.Bagai and Ms. Damani Khair and Mr. Yasin, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25 B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 17.4.2013 by which the ARC has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one shop no.1522 and godown No.1536, Ground Floor, Ward No.1, Church Gate, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006 2. In a petition for bonafide necessit...
Tag this Judgment!Abhay Singh Yadav Vs. the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 2261 of 2014 ABHAY SINGH YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manjit Singh Chauhan, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. Inspector Sube Singh and SI Vijay Pal, P.S. Sagar Pur. Mr. Shanti Prakash, Advocate for the Complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1011.2014 1. This is an application under Section 438 Cr PC seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.14 of 2014 registered at Police Station (PS) Sagar Pur under Sections 307/302/34 IPC.2. This order should be read as a continuation of the previous order passed by the Court on 15th October 2014 which sets out the facts in detail.3. Initially, the Petitioner was arrested from his house on 13th January 2014. He was released on bail by this Court by an order dated 21st February 2014. At that stage the case was still one under Section 307/34 IPC.4. The subsequent event was that as a result of the burn injuries suffered by the da...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Singh Dahiya Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h November, 2014 % + LPA5802014 RAJ SINGH DAHIYA Through: .... Appellant Mr. Gautam Awasthi with Mr. Ayush Chaudhary & Mr. Abhinav Tripathi, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Ms. Sanjogeeta Mokhtar & Ms. Mahima Bahl, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 13th May, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal in limine of W.P.(C) No.3005/2014 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred seeking a direction to the respondent no.2 GAIL Gas Ltd. to fix the price of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) in a fair and non-discriminatory manner, in accordance with reasonable and just policy and for supply of CNG to the appellant, a dealer of the respondent no.2, at Sonepat, Haryana on the Base Rat...
Tag this Judgment!Sh Ghanshyam and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h November, 2014 + LPA8872013, CMs No.18573/2013 (for stay) & 12873/0214 (for filing additional affidavit) SH GHANSHYAM & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. AND + LPA492014, CMs No.1107/2014 (for stay) & 1109/2014 (for condonation of 20 days delay in filing the appeal) O.P. GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. AND + LPA762014, CMs No.1546/2014 (for stay) & 1548/2014 (for condonation of 33 days delay in filing the appeal) SHIV KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTIC...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Tanvir Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : October 30, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : November 10, 2014 + CRL.A.1184/2014 MOHD.TANVIR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate with Ms.Shruti Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Surender, PS Keshavpuram CRL.A.1185/2014 MOHD.JAFAR Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Azhar Qayum, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Surender, PS Keshavpuram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 08:40 AM on December 31, 2011, W.HC Rajeshwari recorded DD No.9A, Ex.PW-28/A, noting therein that an unknown person has informed over the telephone that the dead body of a boy was lying in a MCD park which was in the front of the office of the SDM, Rampura.2. Being handed over a copy of DD No.9A, accompanied by C...
Tag this Judgment!O.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h November, 2014 + LPA8872013, CMs No.18573/2013 (for stay) & 12873/0214 (for filing additional affidavit) SH GHANSHYAM & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. AND + LPA492014, CMs No.1107/2014 (for stay) & 1109/2014 (for condonation of 20 days delay in filing the appeal) O.P. GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. AND + LPA762014, CMs No.1546/2014 (for stay) & 1548/2014 (for condonation of 33 days delay in filing the appeal) SHIV KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar and Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. for Northern Railways. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTIC...
Tag this Judgment!inder Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. Sube Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA1602013 Date of decision:10. h November, 2014 % INDER MOHAN SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Tarun Bedi, Adv. versus SUBE SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr.Manish, Advs. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. as amicus curiae CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellants have challenged the judgment dated 15th April, 2013 whereby their appeal against the decree for possession passed by the learned Civil Judge has been dismissed by the First Appellate Court. For the sake of convenience, the appellants have been referred to as the defendants and the respondent as the plaintiff as per their ranks before the Trial Court. Factual Matrix 2. The plaintiff instituted a suit for recovery of possession and rent/mesne profits in respect of property bearing No.3347, Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi against the defendants. The plaintiff prayed for decree of possession of the plot of land underneath property No.3347, Ranjit Nagar, ...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Jafar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : October 30, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : November 10, 2014 + CRL.A.1184/2014 MOHD.TANVIR Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate with Ms.Shruti Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Surender, PS Keshavpuram CRL.A.1185/2014 MOHD.JAFAR Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Azhar Qayum, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Surender, PS Keshavpuram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Process of criminal law was set into motion when at around 08:40 AM on December 31, 2011, W.HC Rajeshwari recorded DD No.9A, Ex.PW-28/A, noting therein that an unknown person has informed over the telephone that the dead body of a boy was lying in a MCD park which was in the front of the office of the SDM, Rampura.2. Being handed over a copy of DD No.9A, accompanied by C...
Tag this Judgment!Shridhar Gupta Vs. Ndmc and anr.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.95/2010 SHRIDHAR GUPTA Through: .. Appellant Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. K. Modi, Advocate. Versus NDMC AND ANR. Through: Mr. Arvind NDMC. .. Respondents Sah, Advocate for CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 19th January, 2010 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.985/2008 filed by the appellant.2. WP(C) No.985/2008 was preferred by the appellant impugning the order dated 29.01.2008, of the Additional District Judge exercising power as appellate authority under the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), of dismissal of appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 17.06.2004 of the Estate Officer of the respondent NDMC of eviction of the appellant from shop No.122, Yashwant Place, Ne...
Tag this Judgment!