Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 1 of about 1,333 results (0.023 seconds)M/S P.P. Jewellers Vs. Pp Gold Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :29. h September, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1057/2011 M/S P.P. JEWELLERS ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Mamta Jha and Ms.Kritika Seth, Advocates versus PP GOLD CONSULTANCY PVT LTD Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, were issued on 04.05.2011, 22.07.2011 and 16.11.2011. Since the defendant could not be served in the ordinary way an application under Order V Rule 20 CPC was filed by the plaintiff, which application was allowed and defendant was served by way of publication. Despite service none appeared for the defendant, consequently defendant was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 13.02.2012 and the ...
Tag this Judgment!Interactive Media and Communication Solution Priva Vs. Go Airlines Lim ...
Court: Delhi
$~Special Bench *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APP.10/2013 Date of decision:29. h November, 2014 INTERACTIVE MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED. .... Petitioner Through Mr. Manoj Goel, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advocates. versus GO AIRLINES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Saloni Chowdhary and Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.6218/2014 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing of reply to the review application. The application is allowed as there is no objection from the applicant in the review application. C.M.No.15416/2013 Delay in filing of application for review is condoned as there is no objection from the respondent. We notice that application for review has been filed pursuant to the liberty granted by the Supreme Page 1 of 8 Court. The application is accord...
Tag this Judgment!M/S P.P. Jewellers Vs. Pp Gold Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :29. h September, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1057/2011 M/S P.P. JEWELLERS ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Mamta Jha and Ms.Kritika Seth, Advocates versus PP GOLD CONSULTANCY PVT LTD Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, were issued on 04.05.2011, 22.07.2011 and 16.11.2011. Since the defendant could not be served in the ordinary way an application under Order V Rule 20 CPC was filed by the plaintiff, which application was allowed and defendant was served by way of publication. Despite service none appeared for the defendant, consequently defendant was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 13.02.2012 and the ...
Tag this Judgment!Interactive Media and Communication Solution Priva Vs. Go Airlines Lim ...
Court: Delhi
$~Special Bench *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APP.10/2013 Date of decision:29. h November, 2014 INTERACTIVE MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED. .... Petitioner Through Mr. Manoj Goel, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advocates. versus GO AIRLINES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Saloni Chowdhary and Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.6218/2014 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing of reply to the review application. The application is allowed as there is no objection from the applicant in the review application. C.M.No.15416/2013 Delay in filing of application for review is condoned as there is no objection from the respondent. We notice that application for review has been filed pursuant to the liberty granted by the Supreme Page 1 of 8 Court. The application is accord...
Tag this Judgment!M/S P.P. Jewellers Vs. Pp Gold Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :29. h September, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1057/2011 M/S P.P. JEWELLERS ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Mamta Jha and Ms.Kritika Seth, Advocates versus PP GOLD CONSULTANCY PVT LTD Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts of profits, damages and delivery up.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, were issued on 04.05.2011, 22.07.2011 and 16.11.2011. Since the defendant could not be served in the ordinary way an application under Order V Rule 20 CPC was filed by the plaintiff, which application was allowed and defendant was served by way of publication. Despite service none appeared for the defendant, consequently defendant was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 13.02.2012 and the ...
Tag this Judgment!interactive Media and Communication Solution Priva Vs. Go Airlines Lim ...
Court: Delhi
$~Special Bench *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APP.10/2013 Date of decision:29. h November, 2014 INTERACTIVE MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED. .... Petitioner Through Mr. Manoj Goel, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advocates. versus GO AIRLINES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Saloni Chowdhary and Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.6218/2014 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing of reply to the review application. The application is allowed as there is no objection from the applicant in the review application. C.M.No.15416/2013 Delay in filing of application for review is condoned as there is no objection from the respondent. We notice that application for review has been filed pursuant to the liberty granted by the Supreme Page 1 of 8 Court. The application is accord...
Tag this Judgment!Sonu Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~7, 14 to 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:28. 11.2014 7 W.P.(C) 4804/2014 SONU KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through 14 ..... Respondents Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Vinod Kr. Tiwari, Advocate W.P.(C) 7228/2013 MOHIT RATHI Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through 15 ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Ram Gopal Pandey, Advocate W.P.(C) 7235/2013 RAJ KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through W.P.(C) Nos. 4804/14, 7228/13, 7235/13, 34/14, 3237/14 ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. 16 W.P.(C) 34/2014 DEEPAK KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa & Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Om Prakash and Anr Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5399/2014 OM PRAKASH & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Kumar and Mr. K. S. Kashyap, Advocates with petitioners. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Sub Inspector Saurab Kumar, P.S. CAW Cell, Nanak Pura. Mr. S. C. Singhal, Advocate with Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18429/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5399/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.12/2009 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on 17.01.2009 at police station CWC Nanak Pura, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for ...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
16&18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:28. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 8270/2014 & CM APPL. 19204-19205/2014 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Adv for R-1 Ms. Latika Choudhary for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate W.P.(C) 8282/2014 & CM APPL. 19228-19229/2014 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Latika Choudhary for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners in these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assail the common order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in their respective Original Applications being O.A. Nos.775/2012 and 773/2012, whereby the Tribun...
Tag this Judgment!Nathu Ram and Ors Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5421/2014 NATHU RAM & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Ajit Nair, Advocate with petitioners. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Balmukund. Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate with R2and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18491/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5421/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.146/2012 registered under Section 308, 323, 34 IPC at police station Rajinder Nagar on 18.09.2012 at the instance of the second respondent Pragi Lal, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the petitioners as well as the complainant and the injured Udal Raikwar.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Pankaj Shar...
Tag this Judgment!