Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SB-1. + W.P. (C) No. 7057 of 2005 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate/ Amicus Curiae with Mr. Bhagat Singh and Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocates for L&B Deptt. & LAC. Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA with Mr. S.N.Gupta, Director (LM), Mr. V.S. Tomar, Director (Systems), Mr. Brijesh Mishra, Commissioner (LM). Mr. S.D. Sharma, Senior Law Officer (LM). CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER 08 04.2013 1. The Director, Land & Management (LM), Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has filed an affidavit on 28th February 2013 pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 4th January 2013. A power point presentation has also been made to the Court. A hard copy as well as a soft copy of...
Mr. Subrat Basak and ors Vs. Rashtriya Pariyojna Nirman Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 5111/1993 8th April, 2013 MR. SUBRAT BASAK & ORS Through: ...... Petitioners Petitioner no.1 in person. VERSUS RASHTRIYA PARIYOJNA NIRMAN NIGAM LTD. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Mr. Fanish K. Jain and Mr. Vikas B.Pakhiddey, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by four petitioners who were employees of the respondent. The respondent is today called National Projects Construction Corporation Limited (NPCC), and earlier for some point of time the respondent was called Rashtriya Pariyojna Nirman Nigam Limited, the description given to the respondent in the writ petition. The relief claimed in the writ petition is by the four petitioners, who were sent for work by the respondent to Iraq, and the petitioners claim for the period to which they were posted in Iraq (1986 to 1991), since it was directed by th...
idpl Vrs and Retired Employees Welfare Federation Gu Vs. the Secretary ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P(C) No. 237/2010 8th April, 2013 IDPL VRS & RETIRED EMPLOYEES WELFARE FEDERATION GURGAON, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, Y.R.SURI & ORS. ...... Petitioners. Through: Mr. S.K.Singh, Advocate for Ms. Seema Kashyap, Advocate. VERSUS THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr. R.S.Mathur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by 57 employees, viz petitioner nos. 2 to 58, of the respondent no.3-company-M/s Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU). The relief claimed in this writ petition is that petitioners have retired on their attaining the age of superannuation before September, 2002( though there is no such date/month/year in the writ petition and this month and year is taken as per the statement m...
Raghubir Singh Vs. Kuldeep and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:8. h April, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 362/2012 RAGHUBIR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate. Versus KULDEEP & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. M.M.Hashmi, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 362/2012 & CM No. 6204/2012 (for delay) 1. The instant appeal has been filed for enhancement of the compensation amount on the ground that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate the fact that due to the said accident, the appellant suffered 40% permanent disability, treated for a period of six months and he suffered acute pain and suffering owing to the said injuries as the learned Tribunal has awarded a meagre amount of Rs.50,000/- each towards pain and suffering and loss of amenities/expections of life, which is on a very lower side.2. It is contended by the appellant before...
Jasjit Singh and anr Vs. Directorate of Gurdwara Elections and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :04.0-4.2013 Judgment pronounced on :08. 04.2013 LPA No.190/2013 JASJIT SINGH AND ANR Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE OF GURDWARA ELECTIONS & ORS. .... Respondents Through : Ms. Shawana Bari for Mr. Raju Nanda, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The elections to fill up the seats of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee are held under the superintendence and control of the Directorate of Gurudwara Elections. In exercise of the powers conferred upon him by sub Section (1) and (3) of Section 39 of Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971, the Administrator of Delhi made the Rules called Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (Election of Members) Rules, 1974. Rule 14(1) of the aforesaid Rules, prior to its amendment with effect from 28.7.2010 provided that the Director Gurudwara Election appointed under Section 13 of the aforesaid Act s...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Piyush Sharma Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 1248/2008 PIYUSH SHARMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr. Atul Guleria, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. ASI Om Prakash, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) the Petitioner seeks quashing of the summoning order dated 07.09.2006 and a charge sheet (under Section 173 Cr.P.C.) filed on the basis of the FIR No.108/2006 under Sections 292/500/509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition Act, 1986 (the Act of 1986).2. To appreciate the contention, the complaint made by the Complainant to the Commissioner of Police is extracted hereunder: Dear Dr. Paul this is to draw your attenti...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Padam Singh Dagar Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 161/2013 RAJENDER SINGH DAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate versus + THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate Mr. Ajandra Sisodia, Advocate for Complainant. CRL.M.C. 428/2013 PADAM SINGH DAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate Mr. Ajandra Sisodia, Advocate for Complainant. CRL.M.C. 681/2013 BHARAT SINGH Crl.MC 161/2013, 428/2013 & 681/2013 Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate, Mr. Ajandra Sisodia...