Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
H.T. Media Ltd and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3060/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 3922/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Crl. M.C. Nos. 3060/2010, 3922/2010, 3456/2011 & 837/2012 + CRL.M.C. 3456/2011 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 837/2012 & Crl.M.A.3466/2012 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP f...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Gulshan @ Mahender Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 922/2009 Reserved on:3. d January, 2013 Date of Decision:8. h April, 2013 % GULSHAN @ MAHENDER SINGH ....Appellant Through Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE Through + Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 920/2009 BHAGWAN SINGH @ CHHOTEY LAL ....Appellant Through Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE Through + Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 921/2009 KANTA Through ....Appellant Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE Through Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.:1. The appellants Gulshan @ Mahender Singh, Bhagwan Singh @ Chote Lal and Kanta, husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased Aarti, by the impugned judgment dated 29th September, 2009 have been convicted under Sections 498A/34, 304B/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
H.T. Media Ltd and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3060/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 3922/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Crl. M.C. Nos. 3060/2010, 3922/2010, 3456/2011 & 837/2012 + CRL.M.C. 3456/2011 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 837/2012 & Crl.M.A.3466/2012 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP f...
Rozy Vijender @ Elizabeth Samuel Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :8. h APRIL, 2013 + CRL.A. 1561/2011 & CRL.M.B.Nos.2249/2011 & 1503/2012 ROZY VIJENDER @ ELIZABETH SAMUEL ....Appellant Through : Ms.Puja Srivastava, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE .Respondent Through : Mr.Sushil Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.108/2012 titled Vijender Singh vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE APRIL 08 2013/tr...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Ashok Kumar and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.A. 45/2012 ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Ravinder Tyagi, Adv. with Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv., Mr. Bhanu Nandwani, Adv. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. This Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 12.07.2011 and the order on sentence dated 18.07.2011 whereby the Appellants were convicted for an offence punishable under Section 304-II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Appellant Ashok was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 6 years whereas Appellants Gopi and Rinku were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of five years each.2. In order to establish its case, the prosecution examined 13 witnesses. PW-2 Vijay Pal and PW-8 Balbir were projected as the witnesses of the actual incident. The ...
Jitendra Singh Vs. Jai Karan Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. L.P. 179/2013 JITENDRA SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus JAI KARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ORDER 08 04.2013 1. By virtue of this Petition, the Petitioner who was the complainant before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) seeks setting aside of the order dated 04.02.2013 whereby the Petitioners complaint for the offence punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was dismissed for non appearance of the Petitioner (the Complainant) and the accused was acquitted.2. The short ground submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner for setting aside of the impugned order is that the Petitioners absence on the date the complaint was dismissed was not intentional and thus the learned ACMM erred in dismissing the complaint and acquitting the Respondents.3. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that a complaint for ...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Mithilesh Swami
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2677/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Dr.Poonam Sehgal, Advocates versus MITHILESH SWAMI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On September 04, 2006, the Cabinet of the Government of NCT Delhi took decision No.1113 recommending age of superannuation of teachers in schools established by the Government of NCT Delhi to be enhanced from 60 years to 62 years and pending approval from the Union Government resolved that subject to fitness and vigilance clearance, teachers on retirement would be entitled to serve till the age of 62 years. The resolution in question reads as under:In pursuance of Cabinet Decision No.1113 dated 4.9...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »