Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Gulfam (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs and ors Vs. Mohd. Khalil (Since ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on :08.04.2013 RC.REV. 67/2013 MOHD. GULFAM (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Maroof Ahmad, Advocate -versusMOHD. KHALIL (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of present revision petition challenge has been made to order dated 12.03.2012 whereby learned Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application of the petitioners in eviction petition No. E-28/2011 and eviction order has been passed against them under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.2. Background of the case is as under:An eviction petition was filed by the respondents herein under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeking eviction of the tenanted premises i.e., shop No.7914 situated at Mohalla Shaikhan, Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi-6 on the gro...
Kush Dairy Limited Vs. H.P. Printers Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2553/2012 KUSH DAIRY LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. P.D.Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate. versus H.P. PRINTERS PVT LTD Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal and Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocates. Reserved on:19. h March, 2013. Date of Decision:08. h April, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 17807/2012 1. The present application has been filed by the defendant under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 151 CPC.2. Mr. Kirti Uppal, learned senior counsel for the defendant relied upon the arbitration clause contained in the Agreement dated 9th September, 2010 and submitted that the present suit ought to be referred to arbitration.3. Mr. P.D. Gupta, learned counsel for the plaintiff, though did not deny the existence of the arbitration clause but submitted that the present application is not maintainable in...
Neha Thr. Grand Mother Vimla Devi Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h April, 2013 + CRL. REV.P. 227/2007 NEHA THR. GRAND MOTHER VIMLA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv. for Delhi Commission for Women versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. C.L.Dhawan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This Revision Petition relates to an unfortunate incident which is alleged to have been taken place sometime between 05.12.2005 and before 14.01.2006 when the Respondent No.2 allegedly committed rape on his grand daughter who was aged about 13-14 years at the time of the incident.2. Respondent No.2 has been acquitted by an order dated 28.02.2007 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) and the Petitioner through her grandmother seeks leave to Appeal against the impugned judgment.3. While acquitting the Respondent No.2, the learned ASJ observed that the parents of the prosecutrix, that is...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Ram Dass Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 75/2011 Reserved on:9. h January, 2013 Date of Decision:8. h April, 2013 % RAM DASS ....Appellant Through Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narendra Kumar Choudhary, Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh and Mr. Ajeet Singh, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.:1. The impugned judgment dated 18th November, 2010 convicts Ram Dass under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Sunil and Somnath, sons of Om Prakash, by causing injuries on them with firearm on 22 nd April, 2006. The appellant has been convicted under Section 323 IPC, for injuries on Om Prakash, by giving him a push, when he tried to intervene. By order of sentence dated 20th November, 2010 he has been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of paymen...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
C.P. Inasu Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1789/2012 C.P. INASU Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocate. versus DDA Through: % ..... Respondent Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates. Date of Decision : April 08, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present writ petition is directed against the illegal and arbitrary action of the Respondent, Delhi Development Authority in allotting the flat not B-5/9, Sarai Khalil under NPR Scheme, 1979 to the Petitioner despite being aware of the fact that the said flat already stood allotted in favour of one Mr. Satish Kumar Bhatia and against its inaction in not allotting a fresh MIG flat to the Petitioner in lieu of the wrong allotment made to him.2. The Respondent in the year 1979 floated a residential scheme under the name of New Pattern Residential Scheme for allotment of flats, including MIG flats. The Petiti...
Shakuntla Navani Vs. Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~R-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 213/2008 SHAKUNTLA NAVANI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Ms. Renuka Arora and Mr. Vikas Sood, Advocates versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advs. for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 08.04.2013 The appellant who was working as Lower Division Clerk with the respondent Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi did not attend her duty for the period from 1.8.1994 to 8.8.1994. No prior permission had been taken by her for remaining absent from duty during the aforesaid period. On joining of duty on 8.8.1994, she applied for grant of leave. At that time, 21 Earned Leaves and 91 Extraordinary Leaves were due to her. The leave was sanctioned to her and was duly debited to her leave account. However, a charge-sheet containing following three charges was served upon her on 12.9.1994, when she w...
Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7079/2012 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.R.Mathur, Advocate versus SANJEEV KUMAR TYAGI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate with Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.Vinod Kumar Pandey and Mr.Sanjeev Manchanda, Advocates W.P.(C) 7366/2012 SANJEEV KUMAR TYAGI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate with Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.Vinod Kumar Pandey and Mr.Sanjeev Manchanda, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.R.Mathur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Two writ petitions have been filed challenging the order dated August 16, 2012, passed by the Centr...
Indian Council of Agricultural Research and ors. Vs. Sanjeev Kumar Tya ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7079/2012 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.R.Mathur, Advocate versus SANJEEV KUMAR TYAGI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate with Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.Vinod Kumar Pandey and Mr.Sanjeev Manchanda, Advocates W.P.(C) 7366/2012 SANJEEV KUMAR TYAGI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate with Mr.Ashwin Vaish, Mr.Vinod Kumar Pandey and Mr.Sanjeev Manchanda, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.R.Mathur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Two writ petitions have been filed challenging the order dated August 16, 2012, passed by the Centr...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »