Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Drs Logistics (P) Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Agarwal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
F-4 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1131/2008 M/S. DRS LOGISTICS (P) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Ekta Sarin, Advocate with Ms. Ankita Ubeja, Advocate. versus RAJESH AGARWAL & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:04. h April, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for injunction restraining infringement of registered trade marks, passing off, unfair competition and damages.2. However, learned counsel for plaintiff fairly states that she is only pressing prayer A and not prayers B to D.3. The relevant facts of the present case are that in 1988, plaintiff commenced its business as a partnership firm under the name and style of M/S. AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS. Subsequently, in 1991, the partners of M/S. AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS formed the plaintiff company and merged their partnership firm with the company.4. It is stated in the plaint that plaintiff company is today a leading packagi...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mentor Graphics (Noida) Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2013 ITA No. 1114/2008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Appellant versus MENTOR GRAPHICS (NOIDA) PVT.LTD. ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Ms Suruchii Aggarwal For the Respondent : Mr M.S. Syali, Sr. Adv. with Ms Husnal Syali, Mr Mayank Nagi. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In this appeal, the revenue has challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 02.11.2007, passed in ITA No. 1969/Del/2006, relating to the assessment year 2002-03. By virtue of an order dated 13.01.2011, a Division Bench of this court, while admitting the appeal, had framed the following substantial question of law:- (i) Whether the finding of the Tribunal that if any one margin of a comparable, in a given set of comparables is lower than the margin of the taxpayer, then the transactions are at arms length, is co...
Deepak Kumar Mendiratta Vs. Surender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
$~R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:04.4.2013 + FAO(OS) 328/2010 DEEPAK KUMAR MENDIRATTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.V.P.Dewan and Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocates. versus SURENDER KUMAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K.Sharma, Mr.Milan Deep Singh and Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 18.01.2010 vide which the probate petition No.44/1990 filed by the appellant seeking probate of the will dated 30.5.1985 of the testator Tehl Ram Tuteja (hereinafter referred to as the testator) had been dismissed; simultaneously probate petition No.5/1989 filed by the respondent seeking probate of the will dated 29.1.1988 had been granted.2. Record shows that the testator had three daughters; he had no male child. The subject matter of the probate petition was half undivided share in immovable property i.e. Plot not A-294, Derawal ...
Krishna Devi Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. REV. P. NO.683/2010 Date of Decision:4. h April, 2013 + # ! KRISHNA DEVI Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal & Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocates Versus $ STATE & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Ashish S. Kulshreshtha, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person AND % # ! CRL. REV. P. NO. 684/2010 KRISHNA DEVI Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal & Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocates Versus $ * STATE & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: These two revision petitions were filed by the petitioner-complainant under Sections 397 and 401of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973( Cr. P.C. in short) against the order dated 6th May, 2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in the Criminal Revision Petition Nos. 14 and 15 of 2009 filed by two accused-police officials, who hav...
Ravinder Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:04. 04.2013 + WP(C) No.6183/2002 RAVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Shri Arun Bhardwaj & Shri N.D. Kaushik, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Shri S.P. Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges his dismissal from the Indo Tibetan Border Police, (ITBP) dated 5-5-2001, as illegal and disproportionate.2. The Petitioner joined ITPB as Constable(GD) on 01/04/1994. On 26/12/1999 he was issued a movement order to proceed to ITBP Academy, Mussoorie to attend the Commando course starting on 3/1/2000. On 27/12/2999 the Petitioner, along with another constable (GD), Mahender Singh (Escort) left for the course, with arms/ammunition and was given departure to TC Chandigarh with the direction to leave TC Chandigarh t...
Times Internet Ltd. Vs. M/S Indaitimes.Com and Another Fc+
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h April, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1426/2006 TIMES INTERNET LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Satyajit Sarna, Advs. versus M/S INDAITIMES.COM & ANOTHER FC+ Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has sued, (i) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant No.1 from operating its business, products and services with reference to or under the mark/domain name/website indaitimes.com or any other mark or device or logo likely to deceive and cause confusion and/or passing off the defendant No.1s business as that of the plaintiff; (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendant No.1 from operating the domain name/website indaitimes/ indaitimes.com deceptively similar to the plaintiffs mark/trade mark/logo/domain name/website; (iii) for mandatory injunction directing the defendant No.2 IPNIC Inc to cancel the registration of the domain name indaitimes.com ...
Krishna Devi Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. REV. P. NO.683/2010 Date of Decision:4. h April, 2013 + # ! KRISHNA DEVI Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal & Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocates Versus $ STATE & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Ashish S. Kulshreshtha, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person AND % # ! CRL. REV. P. NO. 684/2010 KRISHNA DEVI Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal & Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocates Versus $ * STATE & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: These two revision petitions were filed by the petitioner-complainant under Sections 397 and 401of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973( Cr. P.C. in short) against the order dated 6th May, 2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in the Criminal Revision Petition Nos. 14 and 15 of 2009 filed by two accused-police officials, who hav...
Pradeep Kumar Chawla @ Chhottu Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MARCH, 2013. DECIDED ON :4. h APRIL, 2013. + CRL.A. 860/2011 PRADEEP KUMAR CHAWLA @ CHHOTTU ....Appellant Through : Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Ms.Janhavi Mahana, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Pradeep Kumar Chawla @ Chhottu challenges correctness of the judgment dated 26.04.2011 in Sessions Case No. 105/2006 arising out of FIR No. 43/2003 PS Sarai Rohilla Railway Station by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 29/21 (c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as NDPS Act). Vide order dated 12.05.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for 20 years with fine ` 2 lacs for each offence.2. Raj Kumar Mehta, Pradeep Kumar Chawla @ Chhottu (the appellant herein), Harjinder Singh @ Jinda, Inder Singh, Mohd.Hanif and Harley were charge-sheeted u...
Chander Shamsher Singh Vs. Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3103/2012 4th April, 2013 CHANDER SHAMSHER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Chandel, Advocate. versus INDIAN RAILWAYS CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the respondent in spite of service. I have, therefore, heard the counsel for the petitioner and am proceeding to dispose of the petition.2. By this writ petition, petitioner prays for direction to the respondent-Indian Railways Catering & Tourism Corporation to appoint the petitioner as an Executive, the post to which petitioner applied pursuant to the advertisement dated 2.5.2011.3. The petitioner has been denied the appointment on the ground that the petitioner was only provisionally called for the interview subject to his furnishing experience certificate upto 23.12.2011 but since the petitioner failed to ...
Tinu Public School and anr Vs. Taramani Sharma and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 127/2013 TINU PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh, Advs. versus TARAMANI SHARMA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Navratan Chaudhary, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 04.04.2013 CM No.3771/2013(stay) & CM No.5327/2013(by respondent No.1 for modification of the order dated 4.3.2013) The appellant No.2 Siwas Education Society is running a school by the name `Tinu Public School. The respondent No.1 has been working as a teacher in the aforesaid school. Alleging that the appellants were subjecting the teachers to various acts of oppression and mismanagement, such as, not giving salary and other allowances at par with employees of other schools, not extending benefits of leave, medical facilities, Provident Fund etc., misappropriating major part of the salary, obtaining undated resignation letters from them under duress at the time of appointme...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »