Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Delhi Development Authority Vs. V.S.Kasturia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve :19. 03.2013 Date of Decision :08. 04.2013 + LPA No.989/2004 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus V.S.KASTURIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal by Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as DDA) is directed against the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge by which CWP No.2138/1995 was allowed. The DDA was directed to hand over possession of Flat No.2115, Category III, Sector-D, Pockets2/3, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, to the respondent (hereinafter referred to as petitioner).2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner applied to the DDA for allotment of category III flat under its Vth Housing Registration Scheme and deposited `.15000/- as registration charges. This was evidenced by LPA 989/2004] Page 1 dep...
Bharat Singh Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 161/2013 RAJENDER SINGH DAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate versus + THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate Mr. Ajandra Sisodia, Advocate for Complainant. CRL.M.C. 428/2013 PADAM SINGH DAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.P. Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate Mr. Ajandra Sisodia, Advocate for Complainant. CRL.M.C. 681/2013 BHARAT SINGH Crl.MC 161/2013, 428/2013 & 681/2013 Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dinesh Mudgil, Advocate, Mr. Ajandra Sisodia...
National Board of Examinations Vs. VipIn Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 36/2013 & CM 683/2013(stay) NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mukul Gupta and Dr. Ratesh Goswami, Advocates versus VIPIN SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 08.04.2013 While appearing in Diplomat of National Board (DNB) Final Examination held in June, 2009, the respondent no.1 was, on 14.6.2009 found in possession of a mobile phone. The Ethics Committee of the Board after giving an opportunity of hearing to the respondent, decided, vide order dated 30.3.2010, to debar him for six attempts and cancelled the attempt made by him in June, 2009. The respondent no.1 filed W.P(C) No.803/2001 before this Court challenging the order passed by the appellant debarring him for three years (six attempts) including the attempt of June, 2009, on the ground that he was found using unfair means in the said examination. In the meanwhi...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Throw Ball Federation of India Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 88/2012 Decided on :8. h April, 2013. THROW BALL FEDERATION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula with Mr. Sunil Dalal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Sudhir Nagar, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellant/plaintiff questions the judgment and order dated 13th August, 2012 by the learned Single Judge rejecting the plaint in CS (OS) No.844/2010 on the ground that the relief claimed was time barred.2. The plaintiff claims to be the true and lawful Throw Ball Federation of India. In the plaint, it is averred that the Society was registered sometime in 1982 to represent the interests of and to promote the growth of Throw Ball in India. It is alleged that the third defendant, ...
Hema Vs. Vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. (M) No.367/2013 Decided on :08. h April, 2013 HEMA Through: Appellant Mr. Avinash Bhasin, Advocate. Versus VINOD KUMAR Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Miscellaneous (Main) petition filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 30.1.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge by virtue of which the learned trial court has granted maintenance of `4,000/- per month to the petitioner for her own self and for her minor child. By the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the aforesaid order and enhancement of the ad interim maintenance to a sum of `50,000/- per month for herself and her minor child apart from litigation expenses of `31,000/-.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The respondent/husband had filed a petition being HMA No.57/2011 under Section 13 (1) (ia...
Virender Singh Vs. Deepak Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 491/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 492/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 493/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr.Randhir Jain, Mr.Dhananjai Jain & Ms.Ruchika Jain, Advocates CRL.L.P. 494/2011 VIRENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Medhanshu Tripathi, Mr.Harish Sharma & Mr.Manoj Sehgal, Advocates versus DEEPAK BHATIA Through + ..... Respondent Mr....
Hindustan Media Ventures Ltd and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3060/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 3922/2010 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Crl. M.C. Nos. 3060/2010, 3922/2010, 3456/2011 & 837/2012 + CRL.M.C. 3456/2011 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State CRL.M.C. 837/2012 & Crl.M.A.3466/2012 H.T. MEDIA LTD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.J.Bhambhani,Ms.Nisha Bhambhani & Mr.Apurv Chandoola, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP f...
Raymond Ltd. and ors Vs. Rameshwar Das Dwarkadas P.Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h February, 2013 Pronounced on:8. h April, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 1124/2007 RAYMOND LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Dholakia, Advocate, Mr. Prashant Gupta, Advocate. versus RAMESHWAR DAS DWARKADAS P.LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj K.Singh, Advocate with Mr. Arpan Behl, Advocate, Ms. Sugandha Nayak, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Petitioners invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) for quashing of the summoning order dated 07.11.2006 and the Criminal Complaint No.30/1 of 2005 titled M/s. Rameshwar Das Dwarkadas Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Raymond Limited & Others.2. A complaint under Section 499 read with Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was preferred by the Respondent against the Petitioners on the allegations that the Respondent is the assignee of the tradema...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »