Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navpreet Kaur Chadha Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2013 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.288/2013 NAVPREET KAUR CHADHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. A.Samad, Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Dveep Ahuja, Mr. Tarun Chawla and Mr. M.J.Michael, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.K.Dubey, Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Nilesh Gupta, Assistant Director (COFEPOSA). AND WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.289/2013 PUNIT SAKHUJA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. A.Samad, Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Dveep Ahuja, Mr. Tarun Chawla and Mr. M.J.Michael, Advocates. Versus UOI & ANR Through: W.P.(CRL.)288 & 289 of 2013 ..... Respondents Mr. S.K.Dubey, Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Nilesh Gupta, Assistant Director CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 4081/2013 in W.P.(CRL) 288/2013 CRL.M.A. 4080/2013 in W.P.(CRL) 289/2013 Ther...
R.K.Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 11371/2006 4th April, 2013 R.K.GUPTA Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Rohit Arya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Singh Parihar, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. R.V.Sinha and Mr. A.S.Sinha, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anip Sachthey, Mr. Mohit Paul, Ms. Shagun Matta and Mr. Saakaar Sardana , Advocates for R-3/Coal India Limited. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. R.K.Gupta against his employer-respondent no.3-Coal India Limited seeking the relief that the petitioner should be held entitled to pensionary benefits and petitioner should not be confined to him being given the benefit of provident fund.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner through UPSC joined the services of the Government of India as an Assistant Coal Superintendent Grade II in the Coal Department unde...
Chaturbhuj Vs. Kailash and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.A. 325/2012 % Judgment reserved on:19. h March, 2013 Judgment delivered on:4. h April, 2013 CHATURBHUJ versus KAILASH & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Wadhwa, Adv. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Sharma, Adv. for R2. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 16.12.2011 whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation in favour of the appellant and against the respondents, i.e., owner / insurance company.2. Vide the instant appeal, appellant is seeking enhancement on the ground that he was confined to hospital for a period of 29 days as he was admitted in the Safdarjung Hospital on 24.12.2009 and discharged on 21.01.2010 and thereafter, he followed OPD as per the advice of the Doctor and due to which he had suffered loss of income for the said period. However, ld. Tribunal has not granted even a single penny toward...
indra Pal Singh Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 2235/2004 Judgment reserved on:1. t March, 2013 Judgment delivered on:4. h April, 2013 % INDRA PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gulab Chandra, Advocate. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjiv Joshi, Advocate for Respondent FCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking issuance of mandamus directing the respondents to release pension and GPF amount of Rs.1,44,319/- lying in the petitioners GPF Account not FCI/NZ/2197 with admissible interest upon both, i.e., pension and GPF as well.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 19.09.1960, the petitioner was appointed as Godown Clerk with the erstwhile Department of Food, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Government of India and worked at various places. The Management of Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as FCI) came into being in 1966 under the Act of the Pa...
Punit Sakhuja Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:04. 04.2013 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.288/2013 NAVPREET KAUR CHADHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. A.Samad, Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Dveep Ahuja, Mr. Tarun Chawla and Mr. M.J.Michael, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.K.Dubey, Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Nilesh Gupta, Assistant Director (COFEPOSA). AND WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.289/2013 PUNIT SAKHUJA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. A.Samad, Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Mr. Dveep Ahuja, Mr. Tarun Chawla and Mr. M.J.Michael, Advocates. Versus UOI & ANR Through: W.P.(CRL.)288 & 289 of 2013 ..... Respondents Mr. S.K.Dubey, Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Nilesh Gupta, Assistant Director CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 4081/2013 in W.P.(CRL) 288/2013 CRL.M.A. 4080/2013 in W.P.(CRL) 289/2013 Ther...
Rajnikanth Upadhyaya and ors. Vs. the Directorate of Education and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 5624/2011 3rd April, 2013 RAJNIKANTH UPADHYAYA & ORS. ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Achal Gupta with Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocates. VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Reeta Kaul, Adv. for R-1,2. Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg with Mr. Kish Sharma, Advocates for R-3 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The following reliefs have been claimed in this writ petition:- a. Issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order thereby quashing the letter dated 07th June 2011 whereby the respondent no.3 and 4 suspended the petitioner no.8 in illegal and whimsical manner, and b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order thereby quashing the illegal actions of the respondent nos. 3 & 4 of demoting the petitioner no.1 and c. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate...
Rajender Singh Vs. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 936/2008 Reserved on:6. h February, 2013 Decided on:3. d April, 2013 % RAJENDER SINGH Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Rai, Adv. with Appellant in custody. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Girraj Singh PS Badarpur. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal the Appellant impugns the judgment dated 3 rd October, 2008 whereby he has been convicted for offences punishable under Section 342/376/325 and 506 IPC and the order on sentence dated 6 th October, 2008 whereby he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and a fine of Rs. 30,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment. The Appellant was further directed to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment for offence punishable under Section 342 and 506 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that from ...
Shri Pala Singh Tanck Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: April 03, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6942/2012 SHRI PALA SINGH TANCK ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Impugned decision dated March 29, 2011 has dismissed O.A.No.1111/2011 in limine.2. Since we are remanding the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal for fresh adjudication requiring record to be produced and considered by the Tribunal we do not reflect upon the merits of the controversy; but would be obliged to record our reasons for remanding the matter to the Tribunal.3. Petitioner Pala Singh Tanck had an issue pertaining to his ACR grading for the period 01.08.2006 to 31.03.2007 and 01.04.2007 to 13.8.2007. He was grated Average for the said periods. Undisputedly,...
Esic Vs. Malik Sweet House
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.129 OF 201.& CM 4114/2013 (for condonation of delay) Decided on :3. d April, 2013 ESIC Through: Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus MALIK SWEET HOUSE Through: Respondent Nemo CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Section 82 of the ESI Act, 1948 against the order dated 17.9.2011 passed by Sh.Ajay Goel, Sr. Civil Judge, dismissing the demand raised by the appellant against the respondent.2. The present appeal has been filed along with an application bearing CM No.4114/2013 seeking condonation of 456 days delay in refilling the appeal.3. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The learned counsel has contended that the appeal though was filed in time, however, on account of objections, the same was collected and thereafter, the file was got misplaced in shifting of the department of the appellant and was untraceable and the moment the file was traced, it...
Narender Singh Bhullar Vs. Inder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
#9 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2007/2011 NARENDER SINGH BHULLAR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Manjeet Singh Bhamra with Ms. Nidhi Gupta, Advocates versus INDER SINGH Through ..... Defendant Ch. Ranjit Singh, Advocate Date of Decision:3. d April, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 13047/2011 in CS(OS) 2007/2011 [U/o. 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC] 1. Present suit has been filed for specific performance of contract/agreement and permanent injunction.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that parties executed an Agreement to Sell dated 21st February, 2011 by virtue of which defendant agreed to sell 114 sq. yrds. of plot bearing No. B-1458, Shashtri Nagar, Delhi admeasuring 200 sq. yrds. (approx.). He further states that Rs.5,00,000/- out of the total consideration of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- was admittedly paid by cash at the time of execution of Agreement to Sell.3. The relevant para of the Agreement to Sell is reproduced hereinbelow:...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »