Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rohde and Schwarz Gmbh and Co. Kg Vs. Airport Authority of India and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 11.2013 W.P. (C) No.6547/2013 & CM No.14245/2013 ROHDE AND SCHWARZ GMBH AND CO. KG ....Petitioner versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr Sashivansh Bahadur, Mr Dinesh Mathur, Mr Robin R. David, Mr R. S. Mathur and Mr Chitranshul Sinha. For the Respondents : Mr K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr Digvijay Rai. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the communication dated 06.09.2013 issued by the respondent No.1 rejecting the Pre Qualification Qualifier bid of the petitioner.2. The petitioner, Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG is an independent company specializing in electronics having its headquarter in Muehldorfstrasse 15, 81671 Munich, Germany.3. The controversy invol...
Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Surender Lal Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 11.2013 FAO (OS) 271/2013 & CM No.8874/2013 NRIPENDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL ....Appellant versus SURENDER LAL AGGARWAL AND ORS. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr K.R. Chawla and Mr Sunil Verma alongwith appellant in person. For the Respondents : Ms Monika Arora along with respondent in person. Mr Rajat Aneja & Mr Ishaan Chhaya for R-2 to R-5 and R-14 to 17. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The Appellant has preferred the present appeal impugning the order dated 09.05.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in CS(OS) No.1353/2012 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order). By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the application being I.A. No.12126/2012 filed by the appellant/ defendant No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for rejection of the plaint.2...
Vijay Ghai and anr Vs. Pal Singh Kartar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d August, 2013 Date of decision :1. t November, 2013 % + CRL.M.C. 3669/2011 VIJAY GHAI & ANR Through : ..... Petitioners Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus PAL SINGH KARTAR SINGH ..... Respondent Through : None. + CRL.M.C. 602/2012 VIJAY GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.M.C. 603/2012 MOHIT GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.M.C. 604/2012 VIJAY GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CRL.M.C. 606/2012 MOH...
indu Projects Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 11.2013 + OMP10972013 INDU PROJECTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. with Ms Ginny Jetty Rautry, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr Jaswinder Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J IA No.17770/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP No.1097/2013 1. The captioned is listed before this court on mentioning. Mr Sundaram, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, seeks an injunction on the bank guarantee in issue solely on the ground that the invocation is not in terms of the bank guarantee. It is Mr Sundarams contention that the bank guarantee in this case was conditional, and therefore, the petitioner would be entitled to an injunction if it was able to persuade this court that the letter of invocation did not satisfy the conditions contained in the bank guarantee...
M/S ElgIn Electronics Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:01. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6907/2013 M/S ELGIN ELECTRONICS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv with Mr Ram Krishna and Mr Ratnesh Dev and Mr Sandeep Bist, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ravinder Agarwal, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court is questioning dated 15.10.2013, passed by the Chief Engineer (E), CSQ, whereby he has reiterated his earlier order dated 19.07.2013, debarring the petitioner from participating in any tender in CPWD. A perusal of the OM dated 19.07.2013 would show that the petitioner had sought pre-qualification in a work of sound system in CPWD. It was claimed in the aforesaid OM dated 19.07.2013 that the petitioner had sought pre-qualification on the basis of false work experience certificates and, therefore, in terms of para 1.7 of Section II (Information and Instructions for Bidder) of CPWD Wor...
Mohit Ghai Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. d August, 2013 Date of decision :1. t November, 2013 % + CRL.M.C. 3669/2011 VIJAY GHAI & ANR Through : ..... Petitioners Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus PAL SINGH KARTAR SINGH ..... Respondent Through : None. + CRL.M.C. 602/2012 VIJAY GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.M.C. 603/2012 MOHIT GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.M.C. 604/2012 VIJAY GHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Ms. Prerna and Ms. Gunjan Chawla, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : + ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CRL.M.C. 606/2012 MOH...
Ramsarup Industries Ltd and anr Vs. Indian Renewable Energy Developmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1829/2012 & Crl. M.A.6373/2012 % Reserved on :10. h October, 2013 Date of decision :1. t November, 2013 RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Dileep Tandon, Adv. versus INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv. + CRL.M.C. 3660/2012 & Crl. M.A.17942/2012 RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LTD Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Dileep Tandon, Adv. versus INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have challenged two summoning orders dated 19th October, 2010 (in Crl.M.C. 1829/2012) and dated 22nd December, 2010 (in Crl.M.C. 3360/2012) passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act instituted by the respondent.2. The brief relevant facts relating to this case are as under:- (i) The Petitioner Company availed l...
Ambica Plastopack Pvt Ltd and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2698/2011, Crl.M.A.Nos.9619/2011 & 1468/2013 Reserved on :22. d August, 2013 Date of decision :1. t November, 2013 % AMBICA PLASTOPACK PVT LTD & ANR... Petitioners Through Mr. Sunil Goyal with Ms. Shivani Goyal, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. Mr. Pramit Saxena, Adv. for Respondent no.2 with Mr.B.K. Gupta, Authorized Representative of R-2. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have challenged the summoning order dated 24th February, 2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. Vide ex parte order dated 17th August, 2011, the notice of this petition was issued to the respondents and the proceedings before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate were stayed. The interim order is continuing till date and the proceedings before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate are stayed for last more than two yea...
Shri Siddharth Bansal Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
6 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA7352013 SHRI SIDDHARTH BANSAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawanjit S. Bindra, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate. Date of Decision:01. t November, 2013 % CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present Letters Patent appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 10th September, 2013. The learned Single Judge after agreeing with the appellants submission disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent-University of Delhi that if any seat in the General category was available in MBA in Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi for the academic year 2013-2015, the appellantpetitioner be considered for that seat on the basis of his rank as a General category candidate. However, as no seat was available, appellant was not granted admission.2. The relevant facts in the present a...
Ramsarup Industries Ltd Vs. Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1829/2012 & Crl. M.A.6373/2012 % Reserved on :10. h October, 2013 Date of decision :1. t November, 2013 RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Dileep Tandon, Adv. versus INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv. + CRL.M.C. 3660/2012 & Crl. M.A.17942/2012 RAMSARUP INDUSTRIES LTD Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Dileep Tandon, Adv. versus INDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vinay Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have challenged two summoning orders dated 19th October, 2010 (in Crl.M.C. 1829/2012) and dated 22nd December, 2010 (in Crl.M.C. 3360/2012) passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act instituted by the respondent.2. The brief relevant facts relating to this case are as under:- (i) The Petitioner Company availed l...